Research Article

Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures

Volume: 15 Number: 1 January 2, 2026

Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures

Abstract

Soils in pastures vary significantly with depth due to the stronger interaction between soil and plants in the topsoil. However, research on soil resources in pastures has not yet reached a consensus on the appropriate soil depth to consider when evaluating soil quality (SQ). This study aimed to assess how SQ changes with soil depth in two distinct pasture systems. A semiarid site (Kurşunlu) and a semihumid site (Ilgaz) were selected, and representative sampling areas were designated in each. At both sites, soils at 0-10 and 10-20 cm depths were intensively sampled. The soil quality index (SQI) was calculated for 0-10, 10-20, and 0-20 cm (combining 0-10 and 10-20 cm) soil depths. The means of SQI related to depth and site were compared using one-way ANOVA. The SQI values ranged from 0.211 (± 0.002, 0-10 cm) to 0.556 (± 0.004, 10-20 cm) at Kurşunlu and from 0.230 (± 0.003, 0-10 cm) to 0.601 (± 0. 003, 10-20 cm) at Ilgaz. On both sites, the depth-related SQI means were significantly different, and in all cases, SQI was significantly higher at Ilgaz. The 0-10 cm soil depth proved more suitable than 10-20 or 0-20 cm depths for monitoring SQ. Results suggested that soil pH and bulk density were identified as potential early-warning indicators for soil degradation in the study pastures.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Çankırı Karatekin University

Thanks

This study is based on the data collected during the doctoral thesis project (Grant number: OF270516D03), which was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP) of Çankırı Karatekin University between 2016 and 2018. Additional analyses beyond the scope of the original thesis were performed by the author to prepare this article. The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by the BAP Unit of Çankırı Karatekin University. The authors thank Seval Sünal Kavaklıgil for her help with the field work and laboratory analyses and Bayram C Bilgili for his help with Figure 1.

References

  1. Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Chadwick, D.R., Jones, D.L., Evans, C.D., Jones, M.B., Rees, R.M., Smith, P., 2018. Critical review of the impacts of grazing intensity on soil organic carbon storage and other soil quality indicators in extensively managed grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 253: 62–81.
  2. Andrews, S., Karlen, D., Cambardella, C., 2004. The soil management assessment framework. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68(6): 1945-1962.
  3. Andrews, S., Karlen, D., Mitchell, J., 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 90(1): 25–45.
  4. Andrews, S.S., Carroll, C.R., 2001. Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecological Applications 11(6): 1573-1585.
  5. Arshad, M.A., Coen, G.M., 1992. Characterization of soil quality: Physical and chemical criteria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7(1/2): 25–31.
  6. Arshad, M.A., Lowery, B., Grossman, B., 1997. Physical tests for monitoring soil quality. In: Methods For Assessing Soil Quality Vol. 49. Doran, J.W., Jones, A.J. (Eds.). Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp.123-141.
  7. Bai, R., Xi, D., He, J., Hu, H., Fang, Y., Zhang, L., 2015. Activity, abundance and community structure of anammox bacteria along depth profiles in three different paddy soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 91: 212–221.
  8. Biswas, S., Hazra, G.C., Purakayastha, T.J., Saha, N., Mitran, T., Roy, S.S., Basak, N., Mandal, B., 2017. Establishment of critical limits of indicators and indices of soil quality in rice-rice cropping systems under different soil orders. Geoderma 292: 34–48.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Soil Sciences and Plant Nutrition (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 2, 2026

Submission Date

July 6, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 25, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 15 Number: 1

APA
Yılmaz, Ü., Çakır, M., & Erşahin, S. (2026). Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 15(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1833464
AMA
1.Yılmaz Ü, Çakır M, Erşahin S. Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures. EJSS. 2026;15(1):56-73. doi:10.18393/ejss.1833464
Chicago
Yılmaz, Ülkü, Meriç Çakır, and Sabit Erşahin. 2026. “Soil Quality As Related to Sampling Depth on Semiarid and Semihumid Pastures”. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 15 (1): 56-73. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1833464.
EndNote
Yılmaz Ü, Çakır M, Erşahin S (January 1, 2026) Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 15 1 56–73.
IEEE
[1]Ü. Yılmaz, M. Çakır, and S. Erşahin, “Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures”, EJSS, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 56–73, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.18393/ejss.1833464.
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Ülkü - Çakır, Meriç - Erşahin, Sabit. “Soil Quality As Related to Sampling Depth on Semiarid and Semihumid Pastures”. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 15/1 (January 1, 2026): 56-73. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1833464.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz Ü, Çakır M, Erşahin S. Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures. EJSS. 2026;15:56–73.
MLA
Yılmaz, Ülkü, et al. “Soil Quality As Related to Sampling Depth on Semiarid and Semihumid Pastures”. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2026, pp. 56-73, doi:10.18393/ejss.1833464.
Vancouver
1.Ülkü Yılmaz, Meriç Çakır, Sabit Erşahin. Soil quality as related to sampling depth on semiarid and semihumid pastures. EJSS. 2026 Jan. 1;15(1):56-73. doi:10.18393/ejss.1833464