BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of heavy metal complex phytotoxicity

Year 2016, , 249 - 254, 20.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.2016.3.249-254

Abstract

The experimental data dealing with the effect of heavy metals contained in the technogenic contaminated soils on plant objects under controlled conditions was discussed. The aim of this work is to define the quantitative indicators of copper and zinc potential phytotoxicity, namely germination energy, simultaneous germination and duration of the test plants. It was found that the activity of the test plant growth is linked with copper and zinc complex action. Joint effect of copper and zinc is manifested both in inhibition of lettuce growth and determined, above all, by the nature contamination, soil properties and biological specificity of the test plants.

References

  • Baiseitova, N.M., Sartayeva, J.M., 2014. Phytotoxic action of heavy metals in technogenic pollution. Young Scientist 2: 382−384.
  • Black, N.A., Milaschenko, N.C., Ladonin, V.F. 1999. Ecotoxicological aspects of soil contamination with heavy metals. Agrokonsalt, Moscow. 176 p.
  • Damage determination from soil concentration with chemical substances: Letter 27, December 1993 N 04-25/61-5678. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources RF, р. 32.
  • Datsenko, V.V. Svashenko, Y.V., 2015. Migration of heavy metals from galvanic slime into soil. Economics in the Industry 2: 35−41.
  • FR.1.39.2006.02264, 2009. Measurement technique of seed germination and root length of seedlings of higher plants to determine the toxicity of technologically contaminated soils. 19 p.
  • Gladkov, E.A., 2010. Evaluation of complex phytotoxicity of heavy metals and definition of estimated allowable concentrations for zinc and copper. Agricultural Biology 6: 94−99.
  • Grodzinsky, D.M., Shilin, U.V., Kutsokin, N.K., 2006. The use of plant test systems for the evaluation of the combined action of factors of different nature method. Rec. on. assessing the permissible levels of radioactive and chemical contamination of their combined action. Fitosotsiotsentr, Kyiv. 60. p. 164−171.
  • Gruzdev L.P., 2010. Application of bio-indication to identify the technogenic pollution of agricultural landscapes. Planning, Cadastre and Land Monitoring 3: 13−16.
  • Hubachov, O.I., 2010. Features of the plants to soil bioassay to determine the level of environmental safety industrial areas. Scientific Herald KUEITU. New Technologies 3 (29):
  • Kasimov, A.M. 2011. Problems of formation and accumulation of industrial waste in Ukraine. Ecology and Industry 1: 65−69.
  • Mayachkina, N.V., Chugunov, M.V., 2009. Features bioassay of soil for the purpose of ecotoxicological assessment. Vestn. The Nizhny Novgorod. Zap them. N.I. Lobachevskian 1: 84−93.
  • Olkhovich, A.P., Musienko, M.M., 2005. Phytoindication and Phytomonitoring. Fitosotsiotsentr, Kyiv. 64 p.
  • STATE STANDARDS 2.2.7.029−99, 1999. Gygienic requirements for industrial waste management and determination of their hazard class health. Kyiv. 21 p.
  • Ubugunov, V.L., Dorzhonova, V.O., 2010. Phytotoxicity assessment of lead in turf-podburs. Vestnik TSU, 338, 207−211.
Year 2016, , 249 - 254, 20.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.2016.3.249-254

Abstract

References

  • Baiseitova, N.M., Sartayeva, J.M., 2014. Phytotoxic action of heavy metals in technogenic pollution. Young Scientist 2: 382−384.
  • Black, N.A., Milaschenko, N.C., Ladonin, V.F. 1999. Ecotoxicological aspects of soil contamination with heavy metals. Agrokonsalt, Moscow. 176 p.
  • Damage determination from soil concentration with chemical substances: Letter 27, December 1993 N 04-25/61-5678. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources RF, р. 32.
  • Datsenko, V.V. Svashenko, Y.V., 2015. Migration of heavy metals from galvanic slime into soil. Economics in the Industry 2: 35−41.
  • FR.1.39.2006.02264, 2009. Measurement technique of seed germination and root length of seedlings of higher plants to determine the toxicity of technologically contaminated soils. 19 p.
  • Gladkov, E.A., 2010. Evaluation of complex phytotoxicity of heavy metals and definition of estimated allowable concentrations for zinc and copper. Agricultural Biology 6: 94−99.
  • Grodzinsky, D.M., Shilin, U.V., Kutsokin, N.K., 2006. The use of plant test systems for the evaluation of the combined action of factors of different nature method. Rec. on. assessing the permissible levels of radioactive and chemical contamination of their combined action. Fitosotsiotsentr, Kyiv. 60. p. 164−171.
  • Gruzdev L.P., 2010. Application of bio-indication to identify the technogenic pollution of agricultural landscapes. Planning, Cadastre and Land Monitoring 3: 13−16.
  • Hubachov, O.I., 2010. Features of the plants to soil bioassay to determine the level of environmental safety industrial areas. Scientific Herald KUEITU. New Technologies 3 (29):
  • Kasimov, A.M. 2011. Problems of formation and accumulation of industrial waste in Ukraine. Ecology and Industry 1: 65−69.
  • Mayachkina, N.V., Chugunov, M.V., 2009. Features bioassay of soil for the purpose of ecotoxicological assessment. Vestn. The Nizhny Novgorod. Zap them. N.I. Lobachevskian 1: 84−93.
  • Olkhovich, A.P., Musienko, M.M., 2005. Phytoindication and Phytomonitoring. Fitosotsiotsentr, Kyiv. 64 p.
  • STATE STANDARDS 2.2.7.029−99, 1999. Gygienic requirements for industrial waste management and determination of their hazard class health. Kyiv. 21 p.
  • Ubugunov, V.L., Dorzhonova, V.O., 2010. Phytotoxicity assessment of lead in turf-podburs. Vestnik TSU, 338, 207−211.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Vita Vasilyevna Datsenko This is me

Nataliya Lvovna Khimenko This is me

Publication Date June 20, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016

Cite

APA Datsenko, V. V., & Khimenko, N. L. (2016). Evaluation of heavy metal complex phytotoxicity. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 5(3), 249-254. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.2016.3.249-254