Determination and monitoring of land use changes by using quickbird satellite data and aerial photographs in a selected area of the Northern Adana in Turkey

Abstract

In this study, high-resolution QuickBird satellite images of year October 2006, visual interpretation of aerial photographs of year 1989 and the land cover and changes in land use of North Adana in Turkey between 1989-2006 were monitored and analyzed. In each Picture that imported into GIS, residental areas, agricultural areas, forests, water surfaces and the other categories have been determined. The study area in North Adana in Turkey was determined first as 41.932 hectares, while in 1989 the city center residential areas were 1.351,86 hectaresin 2006 they turned into 2.956,25 hectares, and showed 118,68 % increase, indistrial areas expanded from 115 hectaresto 148,7 and showed 29,36 % increase. Dry agricultural lands turned from 12.442 hectaresinto10.728 hectares and decreased by % 13,8. The statistical data obtained from results showed the dynamics of land use and also consisted a base for future planning.

Keywords

• QuickBird Satellite Image/Wiev, Remote Sensing, Geographic Information System

References

1. Aronoff, S., 1989. Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective, WDL Publ., Ottawa, Canada
2. Carvalho, L.M.T., Fonseca, L.M.G., Murtagh, F., Cleves, J.G.P.W., 2001. Digital Change Detection with the Aid of Multiresolution Wavelet Analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22, 3871–3876.
3. Dai, X.L., Khorram, S., 1998. The effects of Image Misregistration on the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Change Detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36, 1566–1577.
4. Karagüllü, O. Kendüzler, M. 2008. CORINE Sınıflandırması Raporu. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Orman Harita ve Fotogrametri Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
5. Lu, D.S., Mausel, P., Brondizio, E.S., Moran, E., 2004. Change detection Techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25, 2365–2407.
6. Sesören, A., 1998. Uzaktan Algılamada Temel Kavramlar , Mart Matbaacılık Sanatları Ltd.Şti. İstanbul.
7. Small, C., Miller, R.B. 1999. Monitoring the Urban Environment from Space. The International Symposium on Digital Earth, Beijing.
8. Stow, D.A., 1999. Reducing the Effects of Misregistration on Pixel-level Change Detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20, 2477–2483.

9. Şenol, S., Dinç, U., 1994. Kartoğrafya. Çukurova Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yayın No. 89, Adana.
10. Townshend, J.R.G., Justice, C.O., Gurney, C., McManus, J., 1992. The Effect of Image Misregistration on the Detection of Vegetation Change. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 30, 1054–1060.
11. Tunay, M., Ateşoğlu, A., 2004. Uzaktan Algılama Tekniği ve CBS Kullanılarak Bartın Çevresindeki Doğal Olmayan Değişikliklerin Belirlenmesi, 3. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Bilişim Günleri Bildiriler Kitabı, 435-444, Fatih Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
12. Verbyla, D.L., Boles, S.H., 2000. Bias in Land Cover Change Estimates due to Misregistration. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21, 3553–3560.