Physico-chemical characterization of Oak, Pine and Sal forest soil profiles of Betalghat Region of Kumaun Himalaya

Year 2018, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 261 - 272, 01.07.2018

Naveen Ch. Pandey Lalit M. Tewari G.c. Joshi Brij M. Upreti

https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.435082

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Soil
is one of the basic natural resources on which all forms of terrestrial life
co-exist. The soils of three forest types i.e., banj-oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) chir-pine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent) and sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.) of Betalghat block, Nainital District,
(Kumaun Himalaya). Soils were drawn from three depths viz. 0-10 cm, 11-20 cm,
21-30 cm. The
present study were studied resulted to soil physico-chemical properties i.e. maximum soil texture (sand 34.30 %, silt 57.21 % and clay 33.23 %), soil moisture (12.6 %), bulk density (1.43 g.cm^-3),
porosity (52.06%), water holding capacity
(69.27%) and the maximum values
of chemical analysis i.e. pH (6.80), total carbon (3.82 %), organic
matter (6.57 %), total nitrogen
(0.36 %), available potassium (267
mg/kg) and available phosphorous
(62
mg/kg). Banj-oak forest shows
rich physical properties followed by sal and chir-pine forest while chir-pine
forest shows rich chemical properties in compared to sal and banj-oak forest.

Keywords

Soil physico-chemical characterization, Betalghat region, banj-oak, chir-pine, sal forest, Kumaun Himalaya

References

• Bharti, M., Tewari, L., Tewari, A., Joshi, N., 2016. Impact of Alien invasive species on soil physiochemical characteristics in tropical Sal forest, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Research 3(11): 1057-1061.
• Bhatnagar, H.P., 1965. Soils from different quality sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests of Uttar Pradesh. Tropical Ecology 6: 56-62.
• Bhatt, V.P., Purohit, V.K., 2009. Floristic structure and phytodiversity along an elevational gradient in Peepalkoti-Joshimath area of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Nature and Science 7(9): 63-74.
• Bhatt, D.D., 1981. Nepal Himalaya and change. In: Himalaya: Aspects of change. Laal JS (ed), Oxford University Press. New Delhi, India. pp. 253-777.
• Black, C.A., 1965. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1 Physical and mineralogical properties, American Society of Agronomy, No:9. Madison, WI, USA.
• Champan, J.L., Reiss, M.J., 1992. Ecology principles and application. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. 294p.
• Champion, H.G., Seth, S.K., 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, New Delhi. India. 404p.
• Deka J, Tripathi, O.P., Khan, M.L., 2012. High dominance of Shorea robusta Gaertn. f. in alluvial plain kamrup sal forest of Assam, N. E. India. International Journal of Ecosystem 2(4): 67-73.
• Gairola, S., Sharma, C.M., Ghildiyal, S.K., Suyal, S., 2012. Chemical properties of soils in relation to forest composition in moist temperate valley slopes of Garhwal Himalaya, India. The Environmentalist 32(4): 512-523.
• Gupta, R.P., Dhakshinamoorthy, C., 1980. Procedures for physical analysis of soils and collection of agrometerological data. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Division of Agricultural Physics, New Delhi, India.
• Hazelton, P.A., Murphy, B.W., 2007. Interpreting soil test results: What do all the numbers mean? CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne 152 p.
• Ilorker, V.M, Totey, N.G., 2001. Floristic diversity and soil studies in Navegaon National Park (Maharashtra). Indian Journal of Forestry 24(4): 442-447.
• Jackson, M.L., 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA. 498p.
• Jina, B.S., Bohra, C.S., Lodhiyal, L.S., Sah, P., 2011. Soil characteristics in oak and pine forests of Indian Central Himalaya. E-International Scientific Research Journal 3(1): 19–22.
• Johnston, A.E., 1986. Soil organic matter, effects on soil and crops. Soil Use and Management 2(3): 97-105.
• Joshi, G., Negi, G.C.S., 2015. Physico-chemical properties along soil profile of two dominant forest types in Western Himalaya. Current Science 109 (4):798-803.
• Joshi, P.C., Pandey, P., Kaushal, B.R., 2013. Analysis of some Physico-chemical parameters of soil from a protected forest in Uttarakhand. Nature and Science 11(1):136-140.
• Khera, N., Kumar, A., Ram, J., Tewari, A., 2001. Plant biodiversity assessment in relation to disturbances in mid elevational forest of Central Himalaya, India. Tropical Ecology 42(1): 83-95.
• Kjeldahl, J., 1883. Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen Körpern. Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie 22(1): 366-382.
• Kotiyal, P.B., Sinha, S., 2015. Assessment of nutrient status and soil health under various landuses of Tehri District of Uttarakhand. eJournal of Applied Forest Ecology 3(2): 43-47.
• Kumar, M., Sharma, C.M, Rajwar, G.S., 2004. Physico-chemical properties of forest soil along altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Hill Research 17(2):60-64.
• Kumar, M., Singh, H., Bhat, J.A., Rajwar, G.S., 2013. Altitudinal variation in species composition and soil properties of Banj Oak and Chir Pine dominated forests. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science 29 (1): 29-37.
• Mehta, J.P., Shreshthamani, Bhatt, V.P., 2014. Analysis of the physico-chemical properties of the soil and climatic attribute on vegetation in Central Himalaya. Nature and Science 12 (11): 46-54.
• Olsen, S.R., Sommers, L.E.,1982. Phosphorus. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd edition. Page, A.L. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, No. 9, Madison, WI, USA. pp. 403-430.
• Pastor, J., Aber, J.D., McClangherty C.A., Melillo, J.M.,1984. Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65(1): 256-268.
• Paudel, S., Sah, J.P., 2003. Physiochemical characteristics of soil in tropical sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests in eastern Nepal. Himalayan Journal of Science 1(2): 107-110.
• Piper, C.S., 1950. Soil and plant analysis. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, USA.
• Piper, C.S., 1966. Soil and plant analysis (Asian edition). Hans Publishers., Bombay, India. pp. 223-237.
• Sapkota, I.P., Tigabu, M., Odén, P.C., 2009. Spatial distribution, advanced regeneration and stand structure of Nepalese Sal (Shorea robusta) forests subject to disturbances of different intensities. Forest Ecology and Management 257(9): 1966-1975.
• Satya, Upreti, D.K., Nayaka, S., 2005. Shorea robusta- an excellent host tree for lichen growth in India. Current Science 89 (4): 594–595.
• Semwal, D.D., Uniyal, P.L., Bahuguan, Y.M., Bhatt, A.B., 2009. Soil nutrient storage under different forest types in a part of Central Himalayas, India. Ann. For 17(1): 43-52.
• Sharma, C.M., Gairola, S., Ghildiyal, S.K., Suyal, S., 2010. Physical properties of soils in relation to forest composition in moist temperate valley slopes of the Central Western Himalaya. Journal of Forest Science 26(2): 117-129.
• Sheikh, A. M., Kumar, M., 2010. Nutrient status and economic analysis of soils in oak and pine forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of American Science 6(2): 117-122.
• Singh, H., Kumar, M., Sheikh, A.M., 2009. Distribution pattern of Oak and Pine along altitudinal gradients in Garhwal Himalaya. Nature and Science 7(11): 81-85.
• Singh, J.S., Singh, S.P., 1987. Forest vegetation of the Himalaya. The Botanical Review 53(1): 80-192.
• Tewari, G., Khati, D., Rana, L., Yadav, P. Pande, C., Bhatt, S., Kumar, V., Joshi, N., Joshi, P.K., 2016. Assessment of physicochemical properties of soils from different land use systems in Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Research 3(11): 1114-1118.
• Upreti, B.M., Tewari, L., Tewari, A., Joshi, N., 2016. Physiochemical characterization of soil collected from sacred and non sacred forests of Uttarakhand: A comparative study. Journal of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Research 3(11): 989-992.
• Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chronic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29-38.