The effects of two Fe-EDDHA chelated fertilizers on dry matter production and Fe uptake of tomato seedlings and Fe forms of a calcareous soil

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 259 - 265, 01.07.2022

Abdurrahman Ay Salih Demirkaya Rıdvan Kızılkaya Coşkun Gülser

https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1085194

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The present study was carried out to investigate the effects of two different ratios of Fe-EDDHA chelated fertilizers, (F1:4.8% and F2:6%) having the same amount of 6% soluble Fe content, on dry matter production and Fe uptake of tomato seedlings at different growth periods and Fe forms of a calcareous soil. The experiment was conducted in a factorial experimental design using Fe-EDDHA chelated fertilizers and the plant growth periods (10, 20, 30 and 40 days after seedling) with three replicates under the greenhouse conditions. The results indicated that the dry matter content, Fe uptake, chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in plants generally increased over the control with increasing the growth periods. The plant dry matter contents were higher in F1 than F2 fertilization. The plant Fe uptakes in F1 treatment during the growth periods were also higher than that in F2 treatment. The carotenoid content and the chlorophyll formations in terms of both chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b were higher in F2 fertilization at the 20th day and higher in F1 fertilization at the 40th day. The DTPA-Fe and exchangeable-Fe contents in soil samples generally decreased while the organically bounded-Fe content in soil samples increased with increasing growth periods. It can be suggested that 4,8% of Fe-EDDHA fertilizer is more effective on Fe uptake when compared with 6% of Fe-EDDHA chelated Fe fertilizer. Therefore, F1 fertilizer can be used when chlorosis is seen on plants in calcareous soils. On the other hand, F2 fertilizer can be used if long-term Fe fertilization is desired. The differences in effectiveness between Fe-EDDHA chelated fertilizers having the same amount of water-soluble Fe content may be occurred due to differences in their chelating formulas.

Keywords

Tomato, Fe-EDDHA, Fe forms, seedlings

References

• Abadía, J., Álvarez-Fernández, A., Rombolaà, A.D., Sanz, M., Tagliavini, M. Abadía, A., 2004. Technologies for the diagnosis and remediation of Fe deficiency. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 50(7): 965-971.
• Álvarez-Fernández, A., Garcia-Marco, S., Lucena, J.J., 2005. Evaluation of synthetic iron(III)-chelates (EDDHA/Fe3+, EDDHMA/Fe3+ and the novel EDDHSA/Fe3+) to correct iron chlorosis. European Journal of Agronomy 22(2): 119-130.
• Borowski, E., Michalek, S., 2011. The effect of foliar fertilization of French bean with iron salts and urea on some physiological processes in plants relative to iron uptake and translocation in leaves. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-hortorum Cultus 10(2): 183-193.
• Chohura, P., Kołota, E., Komosa, A., 2007. The effect of different source of iron on nutritional value of greenhouse tomato fruit grown in peat substrate. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 67(1): 55-61.
• Demiralay, İ., 1993. Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Erzurum. [in Turkish].
• El-Desouky, H.S., Islam, K.R., Bergefurd, B., Gao, G., Harker, T., Abd-El-Dayem, H., Ismail, F., Mady, M., Zewail, R.M., 2021. Nano iron fertilization significantly increases tomato yield by increasing plants’ vegetable growth and photosynthetic efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44(11): 1649-1663.
• Elkins, R., Fichtner, E., 2012. Causes and control of lime-induced Fe deficiency in California fruit and nut crops. CAPCA Available at [Access date : 08.06.2021]: file:///C:/Users/somu01/Downloads/kipdf.com_causes-and-control-of-lime-induced-fe-deficiency-i_5ab3e30f1723dd329c63e0cd.pdf
• Erdal, İ., Kaplankıran, B., Evren, E., Küçükyumuk, Z., Türkan, Ş.A., 2013. Relationships among dry weight, total ıron, active ıron, chlorophyll and SPAD index of tomato plants grown with different iron containing solution. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 24(1): 36-41. [in Turkish].
• Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C., Wright, R.J., 1990. Iron nutrition of plants: an overview on the chemistry and physiology of its deficiency and toxicity. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 25(4): 553-570.
• Fernández V., Ebert G., 2005. Foliar iron fertilization: A critical review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28: 2113-2124.
• Forner-Giner, M.A., Ancillo, G., 2011. İron stress in citrus. In: Plants and Enviroments. Forner-Giner, M.A., Ancillo, G. (Eds.). InTech Open Book Series.
• Gil-Ortiz, R., Bautista-Carrascosa, I., 2004. Effects of Fe-EDDHA chelate application on evolution of soil extractable iron, copper, manganese, and zinc. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 35(3-4): 559-570. Gülser, F., Yavuz, H.İ., Gökkaya, T.H., Sedef, M., 2019. Effects of iron sources and doses on plant growth criteria in soybean seedlings. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 8(4): 298-303.
• Jin, C.W., Du, S.T., Chen, W.W., Li, G.X., Zhang, Y.S., Zheng, S.J., 2009. Elevated carbon dioxide improves plant iron nutrition through enhancing the iron-deficiency-induced responses under iron-limited conditions in tomato. Plant Physiology 150(1): 272-280.
• Jones, J.B., Wolf, J.B., Mills, H.A., 1991. Plant Analysis Handbook: A Practical Sampling, Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation Guide. Micro-Macro Publishing, Athens, USA. 213p.
• Kacar, B., İnal, A., 2010. Bitki Analizleri. Nobel Yayınları No: 849, 659p. Ankara. [in Turkish].
• Karaman, M.R., Şahin, S., Geboloğlu, N., Turan, M., Güneş, A., Tutar, A., 2012. Humik Asit Uygulaması Altında Farklı Domates Çeşitlerinin (Lycopersicon Esculentum L.) Demir Alım Etkinlikleri. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Dergisi 14(1): 301-308. [in Turkish].
• Krumbein, A., Schwarz, D., Kläring, H.P., 2012. Effects of environmental factors on carotenoid content in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum (L.) Mill.) grown in a greenhouse. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 80(2): 160-164.
• Levesque, M.P., Mathur, S.P., 1986. Soil tests for copper, iron, manganese, and zinc in histosols: 1. The influence of soil properties, iron, manganese, and zinc on the level and distribution of copper. Soil Science 142(3): 153-163.
• Lindsay, W.L., Norvell, W.A., 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42(3): 421-428.
• Lucena, J.J., 2003. Fe chelates for remediation of Fe chlorosis in strategy I plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26(10-11): 1969-1984.
• Pogson, B.J., Rissler H.M., 2000. Genetic manipulation of carotenoid biosynthesis and photoprotection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 355: 1395–1403.
• Ravet, K., Reyt, G., Arnaud, N., Krouk, G., Djouani, E.B., Boucherez, J., Briat, J.F., Gaymard, F., 2012. Iron and ROS control of the DownSTream mRNA decay pathway is essential for plant fitness. The EMBO Journal 31(1): 175-186.
• Ravet, K., Touraine, B., Boucherez, J., Briat, J. F., Gaymard, F., Cellier, F., 2009. Ferritins control interaction between iron homeostasis and oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 57(3): 400-412.
• Ronen, G., Cohen, M., Zamir, D., Hirschberg, J., 1999. Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit development: expression of the gene for lycopene epsilon-cyclase is down-regulated during ripening and is elevated in mutant Delta. The Plant Journal 17(4): 341–351.
• Sainju, U.M., Dris, R., Singh, B., 2003. Mineral nutrition of tomato. Food, Agriculture & Environment 1(2): 176 183.
• Schenkeveld, W.D., Temminghoff, E.J., Reichwein, A.M., van Riemsdijk, W.H., 2010. FeEDDHA-facilitated Fe uptake in relation to the behaviour of FeEDDHA components in the soil-plant system as a function of time and dosage. Plant and Soil 332(1): 69-85.
• Sekhon, B.S., 2003. Chelates for micronutrient nutrition among crops. Resonance 8(7): 46-53.
• Shuman, L.M., 1985. Fractionation method for soil microelements. Soil Science 140(1): 11-22.
• Stahl, W., Sies, H., 2005. Bioactivity and protective effects of natural carotenoids. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 1740(2): 101-107.
• Takahashi, M., Nakanishi, H., Kawasaki, S., Nishizawa, N.K., Mori, S., 2001. Enhanced tolerance of rice to low iron availability in alkaline soils using barley nicotianamine aminotransferase genes. Nature Biotechnology 19(5): 466-469.
• Terry, N., Low, G., 1982. Leaf chlorophyll content and its relation to the intracellular localization of iron. Journal of Plant Nutrition 5(4-7): 301-310.
• Wala, M., Skwarek-Fadecka, M., Kołodziejek, J., Mazur, J., Lasoń-Rydel, M., Krępska, M., 2022. Effect of the Fe-HBED chelate on the nutritional quality of tomato fruits. Scientia Horticulturae 293: 110670.
• Witham, F.H., Blaydes, D.F., Devlin, R.M., 1971. Experiments in plant physiology. Van Nostrend Reinhold Company, New York, USA. 245p.
• Wreesmann, C., 1996. Chelated micronutrients for soilless culture. ISOSC proceedings of the 9th Internatioanl Congress on Soilless Culture. St Helier, Jersey, USA. 12–19 April 1996. pp. 559–572
• Yurtseven, N., 1984. Deneysel istatistik Metotları. TC Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Genel Yayın No. 121, Teknik Yayın No. 56, Ankara. [in Turkish].