Studies on DUS Testing in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.)

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 38 - 49, 01.01.2020

Hirade Pradip Shahajı Ram Babu Srıvastava Sudhir Kumar Sethı Rajesh Kumar Arya Om Prakash Bıshnoı

Abstract

Present investigation was carried out at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to examine the different
morphological characters for distinctness, uniformity and stability of durum wheat varieties. Nine genotypes were
studied over two years and observations on thirty-seven morphological characters were recorded. The study revealed
that morphological characters of wheat plant viz. plant growth habit, coleoptile anthocyanin colouration, flag leaf
anthocyanin colouration of auricle, time of ear emergence, ear waxiness, waxiness of peduncle, flag leaf length,
peduncle attitude, flag leaf width, plant height, lower glume shoulder width, lower glume shoulder shape, outer glume
pubescence, and awns attitude were the most important characters which could easily distinguish the durum wheat
varieties. The characters like foliage colour, flag leaf attitude, flag leaf waxiness of sheath, ear length, lower glume
beak length, lower glume beak shape, flag leaf waxiness of blade, ear colour, awns colour, are also found useful in
distinguishing durum wheat varieties. The seed morphological characteristics such as grain hardness, grain germ width
and grain shape are found to be useful in discriminating durum wheat varieties. But some characters like ear density,
awn length and 1000 seed weight are not found to be so useful in distinguishing durum wheat varieties in the present
investigation. The study also revealed that the characters viz. flag leaf hairs on auricle, brush hairs, peduncle length,
straw pith in cross section, ear shape in profile easily distinguished bread wheat variety ‘PBW 343’ from rest of the
durum wheat varieties. But these characters could not distinguish among durum wheat varieties. The grain colouration
with phenol also could not distinguish among durum wheat varieties but it strongly distinguished bread wheat variety
‘PBW 343’ from all the durum wheat varieties in the study

Keywords

DUS, characterization, identification, durum wheat

References

• Arya RK, Munjal R and Dhanda SS (2012). Evaluation of bread, durum and synthetic wheats and triticale for physiological traits under heat stress conditions. In: National seminar on sustainable agriculture and food security: challenges in changing climate. pp. 27-28.
• Dhesi NS, Desormeaux RW and Paukens J (1969). Identification of wheat and barley varieties at the seedling stage. Proceedings of Association of Official Seed Analysts. 59: 134-140.
• Fraser JGC and Gielier F (1935). Two new methods of distinguishing certain Canadian wheat. Sci. Agric. 15: 564-572.
• Galussi AA, Zimmermann LR, Marchese FG, Moya ME, Reinoso DP, Cevedo A and Romero C (1999). Using seedling hairiness to identify varieties of oats, rice and wheat. Seed Science and Technology. 27(3): 1047-1050.
• Guin K, Sethi SK and Arya RK (2019). Genetic Studies on Triticum timopheevi Based Cytoplasmic Genetic Male Sterility (CGMS) System in Relation to Hybrid Seed Production in Wheat (T. aestivum L.). Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics. 5(2): 103-110
• Gupta N, Joshi MA, Sarao NK and Shrama RC (2007). Utility of phenol test in varietal characterization. Crop Improvement. 34(1): 77-81.
• Haljak M (2005). The distinctness of spring wheat perspective breeds by morphological characteristics. Trasactions of the Estonian Agricultural University, Agronomy. 220: 51-53.
• Kant S, Lamba RAS, Arya RK and Panwar IS (2014). Effect of terminal heat stress on stability of yield and quality parameters in bread wheat in southwest Haryana. Journal of Wheat Research 6 (1), 64-73
• Kochetova EA (1971). Determination of authenticity of wheat seeds by laboratory methods. Trudypo Prikladnoi Botanike, Genetike Selektsii. 44(3): 5-49.
• Kumar Y, Ram H, Gulia SK and Ram H. (2002). Varietal identification in oat based on field parameters. Forage Research. 28(2): 73-76.
• Kundu S, Shoran J and Mishra B (2006). National Guidelines for the conduct of tests for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability- Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Research Bulletin No. 22. Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal, 132001 (India): 32 pp Milan AL and Hossain SMA (1973). Evaluation of plant characters of some local and exotic varieties of rice. Science and Industry. 8(3-4): 269-276.
• Mor RS, Buttan KR and Mehla BS (2006). Identification of rice varieties by laboratory techniques. National Journal of Plant Improvement. 8(1): 28-31 Motzo R and Giunta F (2002). Awnedness affects grain yield and kernel weight in near isogenic lines of durum wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(2): 1285-1293.
• Nethra N, Rajendraprasad S, Vishwanath K, Dhanraj KN and Gowda R (2007). Identification of rice hybrids and their parental lines based on seed, seedling characters, chemical tests and gel electrophoresis of total soluble seed proteins. Seed Science and Technology. 35: 176-186. Panwar IS, Redhu AS, Verma SR, Karwasra SK, Bishnoi OP and Arya RK (2013). WH 1105: A new wheat variety for timely sown irrigated conditions in north western plains zone of India. Journal of wheat reaesrch. 5(2):74-75.
• Preeti Panwar IS and Arya RK (2016). Effects of changing environment on wheat dry matter yield Forage Research, 42 (1) : pp. 56-61. http:// forageresearch.in
• Reeves JC and Boyd MM (1984). The use of some spike and spikelet characters in establishing the distinctness of ryegrass cultivars. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany, UK. 16 (3): 513-525.
• Sethi SK and Arya RK (2012). Importance of durum wheat in changing social life. Wheat and barley sawarnima.4: 76-79.
• Sharief AE, EL-Moursy SA, Salama AM, El-Emery MI and Youssef FE (2005). Morphological and molecular biochemical identification of some rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 5(9): 1275-1279.
• Singh T and Sharma RK (2007). Genetic variability, character association and path analysis of yield and its component characters in durum wheat. Progressive Agriculture. 7(1/2): 15-18.
• Wrigley CW (1976). Single seed identification of wheat varieties: use of grain hardness testing, electrophoretic analysis and a rapid test paper for phenol reaction. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture. 27: 429-432.
• Yadav AK, Narwal MS and Arya RK (2013). Morphological characterization of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) genotypes and their application for DUS testing. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 83(12):1305-1316.