Crossability Studies Among Various Species of Genus Vigna

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 27 - 32, 30.01.2022

Shailja Sharma Raj K. Mıttal Vinod K. Sood Harinder K. Chaudhary

Abstract

A total of 30 inter-specific crosses of Vigna mungo x V. umbellata (urdbean x ricebean) and V. mungo x V. angularis
(urdbean x adzukibean) were attempted to study the crossability of urdbean with ricebean and adzukibean. Out of 30
cross combinations, 12 cross combinations of V. mungo x V. umbellata were successful. Day-to-day visual observations
showed that most of the emasculated buds dropped the very next day after pollination and some aborted after about a week.
Some of the crosses developed into pods without seeds and dropped. Pod formation involving V. angularis as one of the
parents in inter-specific hybridization was not very successful as there was no pod formation and buds dropped after 1-3
days of pollination. Among the crosses of V. mungo x V. umbellata, the crossability of Palampur-93 x PRR-2 was highest
(14.18%) followed by Him Mash-1 x VRB-3 (13.64%) and PDU-1 x PRR-2 (13.05%). Interspecific hybridization was
performed with the objective to transfer disease resistance in urdbean. The s tudy indicated that different kinds of pre and
post fertilization barriers are responsible for complete sterility to low fertility. The genotypes showing a substantially high
percent of crossability may be utilized for genetic improvement of urdbean.

Keywords

Inter-specific hybridization, crosses, urdbean ricebean and adzukibean, Inter-specific hybridization, crosses, urdbean ricebean and adzukibean

References

• Ahn CS and Hartmann RW, (1977). Interspecific hybridization among four species of the genus Vigna Savi. In. Proceedings of International Mungbean Symposium, 16-19 Aug, 1977, University of the Philippines, Los Banos: 240-246.
• Ali M, Gupta S, Singh BB and Kumar S, (2006). Role of plant introduction in varietal development of pulses in India. Ind. J. Plant Gen. Res.19:346-352.
• Anonymous (2019). Data on pulses IIPR Kanpur. http:// iipr.res.in/e-pulse-data-book.html.
• Bhanu N, Singh MN and Srivastava K, (2018). Crossability studies of Interspecific hybridization among Vigna species. Biomed. J. Scien.Tech. Res.2(5):2885-2891.
• Bharathi A, Selvaraj KSV, Veerabadhiran P and Laksh BS, (2006). Crossability barriers in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek): with its wild relatives. Ind. J. Crop Sci:120-124.
• Bhareti P, Singh DP and Khulbe RK, (2011). Genetic variability and association analysis of advanced lines and cultivars following intervarietal and interspecific crosses in blackgram. Crop Improv.38:67-70.
• Chen NC, Baker RL and Honmma S, (1983). Interspecific crossability among four species of Vigna food legumes. Euphytica 32: 925-937.
• Dhiman R, Mittal RK, Chaudhary HK and Yadav AK, (2013). Crossability relationship between blackgram (Vigna mungo) and ricebean (V. umbellata) for successful blackgram x ricebean hybridization programme. Ind. J. Agric. Sci.83: 907-911.
• Gomez KA and Gomez AA, (1984). Problem data. In: Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. Wiley- Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore. p:272-315
• Harmankaya M, Ceyhan E, Çelik AS, Sert H, Kahraman A and Özcan MM, (2016). Some chemical properties, mineral content and amino acid composition of cowpeas [Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi]. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 8(1): 111-116.
• Lekhi P, Gill RK, Kaur S and Bains TS, (2017). Generation of interspecific hybrids for introgression of mungbean yellow mosaic virus resistance in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Legume Res.3808:1-6.
• Malik BA, (1994). Grain legumes. In: Crop Production (Ed.): MS Nazir. National Book Foundation, Islamabad. p:301.
• Mittal RK, Katna G and Sood BC, (2005). Inter-specific hybridization in the genus Vigna. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Food Legumes Research, Oct. 2005, New Delhi.
• Mittal RK, Sharma R, Gupta D, Dhiman R and Parmar A, (2010). Identification of interspecific hybrids of urdbean (V. mungo) x ricebean (V. umbellata) using PCR based marker and their further evaluation. Abst. The fourth Asian Chromosome Colloquium, Chromosome science p:135.
• Mittal RK, Sood BC, Sharma R and Katna G, (2008). Interspecific hybridization and DNA based polymorphism in urdbean (V. mungo), ricebean (V. umbellata) and adzukibean (V. angularis). Abst. The third Asian Chromosome Colloquium, Chromosome science11:48.
• Pratap A and Kumar J, (2011). History, origin and evolution. In: Pratap A, Kumar J (eds.) Biology and Breeding of food legumes, CAB International., Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. p:7. Rashid K, Daran ABM, Nezhadahmadi A, Yusof MFBM, Azhar S and Efzueni S, (2013).
• Intraspecific crosses and morphological studies of two cultivars of Vigna radiata through in-vitro and in-vivo techniques. Life Sci. J. 10: 2549- 2555.
• Sehrawat N, Yadav M, Venkataraman BK, Sairam RK and Jaiwal PK, (2016). Introgression of mungbean yellow mosaic virus resistance in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and purity testing of F1 hybrids using SSRs. Tur J. Agric.For.40: 95-100.
• Sert H and Ceyhan E, (2012). Hatay ili ekolojik şartlarında börülce [Vigna sinensis (L.) Savi] çeşitlerinin tane verimi ve bazı tarımsal özellikleri üzerine farklı bitki sıklıklarının etkileri. Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(1): 34-43.
• Thiyagu K, Jayamani P and Nadarajan N, (2008). Pollen pistil interaction in inter-specific crosses of Vigna species. Cytologia73:251-257