Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) constitutes one of the significant threats to public health, and this is partly due to overuse and misuse of antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine. The cost-effectiveness of different strategies in responsible antimicrobial use, a critical practice in veterinary sectors controlling AMR, is often unclear. This essay seeks to discuss the application of pharmacoeconomics in evaluating the economic impact and public health implications emanating from various practices in AMU in veterinary medicine. A review of the existing literature shows challenges in variability in antimicrobial use across animal species, difficulties in quantifying indirect costs, and data limitations. The essay also brings out successful studies using pharmacoeconomic models, providing insight into their potential for evidence-based decision-making. This essay focuses on the equilibrium among animal health, human health, and economic sustainability in trying to provide guidelines on future research and policy directions regarding responsible use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine as support for veterinarians, policymakers, and researchers.
pharmaeconomics veterinary medicine antimicrobial use cost-effectiveness analysis public health antimicrobial resistance responsible use economic implications animal health welfare
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Microeconomic Theory |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | February 27, 2025 |
Publication Date | |
Submission Date | November 19, 2024 |
Acceptance Date | February 27, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 7 Issue: 1 |
As the first video article in Turkey, it was featured in the Journal of Ekonomi.
Instagram: @journalofekonomi
YouTube: Journal of Ekonomi
---------------------------------------------------------
View Watch Video Articles
---------------------------------------------------------
* (Kuru ve Balkan, 2020: Türkiye Ekonomisi Özel Sayısı, 5-9)
* (Işık et al., 2019: 1(1): 1-27)
* (Radulescu and Sandra, 2019 1(1): 28-32)
* (Berger, 2019, 1(1): 43-48)
* (Özelli, 2019 1(1): 49-83)
* (Crenguta, 2019 1(1): 84-86)
-------------------------------------------------------