Social Transfers and Income Inequality in Turkey: How Informative Is the Survey of Income and Living Conditions?

Year 2014, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 23 - 42, 01.09.2014

Cem Başlevent

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the difficulties in determining the extent to which social transfers have an impact on income inequality in Turkey. Given the socio-economic and political importance of the issue, an examination of the redistributive impact of pensions and socialassistance programs in Turkey could indeed be an enlightening exercise. Unfortunately, some data inadequacies limit our ability to provide a reliable answer to the research question. The currently available micro data set drawn from the Survey of Income and Living Conditions (SILC) identifies the amounts of various types of income received by individuals or—in some cases—households, and we find that social assistance and disability benefits do alleviate income inequality. However, the actual redistributive effect of what is generally agreed upon as “social assistance” in the Turkish context is probably quite larger than our findings suggest. The reason is that certain types of social benefits are lumped together in the SILC with other income types, while others—including health-insurance premiums paid by the state on behalf of poor households—are not recorded at all. The redistributive impact of pension payments and unemployment benefits does not appear to be very large, since especially the latter are received mainly by individuals who are outside the lower end of the income distribution.

Keywords

Social transfers, social assistance, income inequality, Turkey, SILC.

References

• Barr, N., (2004), The Economics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Baslevent, C., (2010), “Recent Trends in Factor Contributions to Household Income Inequality in Turkey”, Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the Middle East Economic Association held in Istanbul, Turkey, 24-26 June 2010.
• Baslevent, C., (2015), “Sosyal Yardımlar”, Đktisat ve Toplum, 53 (March 2015), pp. 47-51.
• Baslevent C. and A. Acar, (2015), “Recent Trends in Informal Employment in Turkey”, Yıldız Social Science Review, 1 (1), pp. 77-88.
• Buğra, A. and S. Adar, (2008), “Social Policy Change in Countries without Mature Welfare States”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 38, pp. 83–107.
• Buğra, A. and A. Candas, (2011), “Change and Continuity under an Eclectic Social Security Regime: The Case of Turkey”, Middle Eastern Studies, 47 (3), pp. 515–528.
• Buğra, A. and Ç. Keyder, (2006), “The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation”, Journal of European Social Policy, 16 (3), pp. 211–228.
• Cancian, M., and D. Reed, (1998), “Assessing the Effects of Wives' Earnings on Family Income Inequality”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1), pp. 73-79.
• Danziger, S., R. Haveman, and R. Plotnick, (1981), “How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings, and the Income Distribution: A Critical Review”, Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (3), pp. 975-1028.
• Dastan, Đ. and V. Çetinkaya, (2015), “OECD Ülkeleri ve Türkiye’nin Sağlık Sistemleri, Sağlık Harcamaları ve Sağlık Göstergeleri Karsılastırması” (in Turkish), Journal of Social Security, 5 (1), pp. 104-134.
• Dayıoğlu, M. and C. Baslevent, (2006), “Imputed Rents and Regional Income Inequality in Turkey: A Subgroup Decomposition of the Atkinson Index”, Regional Studies, 40 (8), pp. 889-905.
• Ding, S., X. Dong, and S. Li, (2009), “Women's Employment and Family Income Inequality during China's Economic Transition”, Feminist Economics, 15 (3), pp. 163-90.
• Eder, M., (2009), “Retreating State? Political Economy of Welfare Regime Change in Turkey”, Middle East Law and Governance, 2 (2), pp.152 – 184.
• Erol, H. and A. Özdemir, (2014), “Türkiye’de Sağlık Reformları ve Sağlık Harcamalarının Değerlendirilmesi” (in Turkish), Journal of Social Security, 4 (1), pp. 9-34.
• Esen, B., (2014), “Myths and Facts About Turkey’s Welfare Regime”, www.dailysabah.com, August 26, 2014.
• Fields, G. S., (1979), “Income Inequality in Urban Colombia: A Decomposition Analysis”, Review of Income and Wealth, 25, pp. 327-41.
• Filiztekin, A. (2015) “Income Inequality Trends in Turkey“, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 30 (350), pp. 63-92.
• Fräßdorf, A., M. Grabka, and J. Schwarze, (2011), “The Impact of Household Capital Income on Income Inequality: A Factor Decomposition Analysis for Great Britain, Germany and the USA”, Journal of Economic Inequality, 9 (1), pp. 35-56.
• Frick, J. R., F. Büchel, and P. Krause, (2000), “Public Transfers, Income Distribution, and Poverty in Germany and in the United States”, in R. Hauser and I. Becker (eds.) The personal distribution of income in an international perspective. Berlin: Springer.
• Fuest, C., J. Niehues, and A. Peichl, (2010), “The Redistributive Effects of Tax Benefit Systems in the Enlarged EU”, Public Finance Review, 38 (4), pp. 473-500.
• Göçmen, Đ., (2014), “Religion, politics and social assistance in Turkey: The rise of religiously motivated associations”, Journal of European Social Policy, 24 (1), pp. 92-103.
• Grütjen, D., (2008), “The Turkish Welfare Regime: an Example of the Southern European Model? The Role of the State, Market and Family in Welfare Provision”, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 7 (1), pp. 111-129.
• Immervoll, H., H. Levy, C. Lietz, D. Mantovani, C. O’Donoghue, H. Sutherland, and G. Verbist, (2005), "Household Incomes and Redistribution in the European Union: Quantifying the Equalising Properties of Taxes and Benefits", in D. B. Papadimitriou (Ed.), The Distributional Effects of Government Spending and Taxation, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Jesuit, D. K. and V. A. Mahler, (2004), “State Redistribution in Comparative Perspective: A Crossnational Analysis of the Developed Countries”, LIS Working Paper, No. 392. Luxembourg, Luxembourg Income Study.
• Jesuit, D. K. and V. A. Mahler, (2010), “Comparing government redistribution across countries: The problem of second-order effects”, Social Science Quarterly, 91 (5), pp. 1390–1404.
• Karadeniz, O., (2012), “Extension of Health Services Coverage for Needy in Turkey: From Social Assistance to General Health Insurance”, Journal of Social Security, 2 (2), pp. 103-123.
• Kaya, E. and Ü. Senesen, (2009), “Gini Decomposition By Gender: Turkish Case”, Brussels Economic Review – Cahiers Economiques De Bruxelles, 53 (1), pp. 59-83.
• Lerman, R. I., (1999), "How Do Income Sources Affect Income Inequality?" in J. Silber (Ed.) Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement. Boston; Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic. pp. 341-58.
• Marx, I., B. Nolan, and J. Olivera, (2014), “The Welfare State and Anti-Poverty Policy in Rich Countries”, Ch. 23 in A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (Eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 2B, pp. 2063-2139, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Niehues, J., (2010), “Social Spending Generosity and Income Inequality: A Dynamic Panel Approach”, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5178.
• Pınarcıoğlu. M. M. and O. Isık, (2009), “Segregation in Istanbul: Patterns and processes”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100 (4), pp. 469–484.
• Reed D. and M. Cancian, (2001), “Sources of Inequality: Measuring the Contributions of Income Sources to Rising Family Income Inequality”, Review of Income and Wealth, 47 (3), pp. 321-33.
• Shorrocks, A. F., (1982), "Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components", Econometrica, 50 (1), pp. 193-211.
• Silber, J. and S. Özmucur, (2000), “Decomposition of Income Inequality: Evidence from Turkey”, Topics in Middle Eastern and North African Economies, Vol. 2, Middle East Economic Association and Loyola University Chicago, September 2000.
• Sinn, H.-W., (1995), “A Theory of the Welfare State”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97 (4), pp. 495-526.
• TÜSĐAD, (2000), Türkiye’de Bireysel Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk: Avrupa Birliği ile Karsılastırma, Đstanbul: TÜSİAD.
• TÜSĐAD, (2014), Türkiye'de Bireysel Gelir Dağılımı Esitsizlikleri: Fonksiyonel Gelir Kaynakları ve Bölgesel Esitsizlikler, Đstanbul: TÜSİAD.
• Wang, C., K. Caminada, and K. Goudswaard, (2012), “The Redistributive Effect of Social Transfer Programmes and Taxes: A Decomposition Across Countries”, International Social Security Review, 65 (3), pp. 27-48.
• Whiteford, P., (2008), “How Much Redistribution do Governments Achieve? The Role of Cash Transfers and Household Taxes”, Ch. 4 in Growing Unequal: Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries, OECD, Paris.
• Yazıcı, B., (2012), “The Return to the Family: Welfare, State, and Politics of the Family in Turkey”, Anthropological Quarterly, 85 (1), pp. 103-140.