Kalkınmacı Ağ Devletinin Ekonomi Politiği: ABD Örneği

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 191 - 218, 12.03.2025

Muhteşem Kaynak

Abstract

20. yüzyılda çeşitli ülkelerde uygulanan kalkınmacı devlet politikaları, 21.yüzyılda “BİT (Bilgi İletişim Teknolojisi) odaklı” üretim yapılarının yükselişi ve böylece teknoloji uzmanlığının merkezi bir önem kazanması sonucunda “kalkınmacı ağ devletleri” kapsamında evrilmeye başlamıştır. Kalkınmacı devletlerde olduğu gibi kalkınmacı ağ devletlerinde de devlet yine üstlendiği aktif politikalarla bu oluşumları etkin bir şekilde yönetmektedir. Bu nedenle burada ABD’de öteden beri uygulanagelmekte olan müdahaleci politikalardan “kalkınmacı ağ devleti” alanından en çarpıcı iki örnek olarak, “(Savunma) İleri Araştırma Projesi [(D)ARPA]” ve “İleri teknoloji Programı (ATP)” ele alınıp incelenmiştir.

Keywords

Kalkınmacı Devlet, Ekonomik Kalkınma, Ekonomi Politik, İnovasyon, ABD

Political Economy of the Developmental Network State: The Case of the USA

Abstract

The developmental state policies implemented in various countries in the 20th century have begun to evolve within the scope of “developmental network states” as a result of the rise of “ICT (Information Communication Technology) focused” production structures in the 21st century and the central importance of technological expertise. As in developmental states, the state effectively manages these formations with the active policies it undertakes in developmental network states. Therefore, here, the two most striking examples of interventionist policies that have been implemented in the USA for a long time, the “(Defense) Advanced Research Project [(D)ARPA]” and the “Advanced Technology Program (ATP)”, are discussed and examined.

Keywords

Developmental State, Economic Development, Political Economy, Innovation, USA

References

• AKOYA. (2006). Measuring ATP Impact: 2006 Report on Economic Progress. Prepared for Economic Assessment Office, Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, GCR 06-899.
• Ansell, C. (2000). The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe. Governance, 13(3), 303–33. Bell, D. (1976). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
• Bingham, T. H. (2001). Estimating Economic Benefits from ATP Funding of New Medical Technologies. C. W. Wessner (Der.), The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes içinde (s. 211-222). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Block, F. (2008). Swimming Against the Current: The Rise of a Hidden Developmental State in the United States. Politics and Society, 36(2), 169-206.
• Block, F. (2016). Innovation and the Invisible Hand of Government. F. Block ve M. R. Keller (Der.), State of Innovation: The U.S. Government’s Role in Technology Development içinde (s. 6-55). London and New York: Routledge.
• Block, F. ve Negoita, M. (2016). Beyond Embedded Autonomy: Conceptualizing the Work of Developmental States. Chu, Y.-w. (Der.), The Asian Developmental State: Reexaminations and New Departures içinde (s. 57-72). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Block, F., Keller, M. R. ve Negoita, M. (2023). Revisiting the Hidden Developmental State. Politics and Society, 0 (0), 1–33.
• Brum, K. (2018). Tech world. Foreign Affairs, 97(4), 43-48.
• Brynjolfsson, E., ve McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
• Castell, M. (2010). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society. İkinci Baskı. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Davis, J. P. (2009). Network Dynamics of Exploration and Exploitation: Pruning and Pairing Processes in Collaborative Innovation. MIT Working Paper.
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Evans, P. B. (2008). In Search of The 21st Century Developmental State. Working Paper No. 4. Centre for Global Political Economy (CGPE) at the University of Sussex, United Kingdom, 1-25.
• Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Fong, G. R. (2019). ARPA Does Windows: The Defense Underpinning of the PC Revolution. W. B. Bonvillian, R. V. Atta ve P. Windham (Der.), The DARPA Model for Transformative Technologies: Perspectives on the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency içinde (s. 145-178). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. (18.06.2024 tarihinde https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0184.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir)
• Fuchs, E. R.H. (2010). Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Research Policy, Elsevier, 39(9), 1133-1147.
• Gao, B. (2020). The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 40(2), 577–597.
• Gallo, M. E. (2018). Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Overview and Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress, R45088, Congressional Research Service.
• Gates (1998). Remarks by Bill Gates. Microsoft News Release. 18 May.
• Geschke, C. (1999). The U.S. Environment for Venture Capital and Technology-Based Start-Ups. National Research Council (Der.), Harnessing Science and Technology for America’s Economic Future: National and Regional Priorities içinde (s. 113-117). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Hill, C. T. (1998). Advanced Technology Program: Opportunities for Enhancement. L.M. Branscomb ve J. H. Keller (Der.), Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy That Works içinde (s. 143-173). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Hobsbawm, E. J. (1999). Industry and Empire: From 1750 to the Present Day. New York: New Press.
• Johnson, A. C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle, The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• Kallman, M. E. ve Frickel, S. (2023). Making the ‘business case’: vocabularies of motive and clean tech innovation in the hidden developmental state. Socio-Economic Review, 21(1), 571–592.
• Kaynak, M. (2020). Kalkınmacı Devletin Ekonomi Politiği. Ekonomi-tek, 9(2), 59-99.
• Kohli, A. (2004). State-Directed Development, Political Power and Industrialisation in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kurzweil, R. (2000). The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Penguin Books.
• Laredo, P. ve Mustar, P. (Ed.) (2001). Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
• Link, A. N. (2001). Enhanced R&D Efficiency in an ATP-funded Joint Venture. C. W. Wessner (Der.), The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes içinde (s. 223-238). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Mayer, J. (2016). Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires behind the Rise of the Radical Right. New York: Doubleday.
• Mazzucato, M. (2015). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Revised Edition. New York: Public Affairs.
• McCray, W. P. (2009). From Lab to iPod: A Story of Discovery and Commercialization in the Post–Cold War Era. Technology and Culture, 50(1), 58-81.
• Moraes, I. A. (2023). The concept of Developmental State revisited. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 43 (4), 813-836.
• Murray, H. J. R. (2012). A History of Chess. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
• NRC (National Research Council). (1999). Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Negoita, M. (2016). To Hide or Not to Hide?: The Advanced Technology Program and the Future of U.S. Civilian Technology Policy. F. Block, ve M. R. Keller, (Der.), State of Innovation: The U.S. Government’s Role in Technology Development içinde (s. 122-150). London and New York: Routledge.
• O’Riain, S. (2004). The Politics of High-Tech Growth: Developmental Network States in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Orton, J. D. ve Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203–23.
• Roland, A. ve Shiman, P. (2002). Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence 1983–1993. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Schrank, A. ve Kurtz, M. J. (2005). Credit Where Credit Is Due: Open Economy Industrial Policy and Export Diversification in Latin America and the Caribbean. Politics and Society, 33(4), 671–702.
• Schrank, A. ve Whitford, J. (2011). The Anatomy of Network Failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151–177.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1994). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (with a new Introduction by R. Swedberg). London and New York: Routledge.
• Sen, A. (2017). Island + Bridge: how transformative innovation is organized in the federal government. Science and Public Policy, 44(5), 707–721.
• Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Wade, R. H. (2014). The paradox of US industrial 14 policy: The developmental state in disguise. J. M. Salazar-Xirinachs, I. Nübler ve R. Kozul-Wright (Ed.), Transforming Economies: Making industrial policy work for growth, jobs and development içinde (s. 379-400). Geneva: ILO.
• Wessner, C. W. (Ed.) (2001). The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Williams, M. (2014). Rethinking the Developmental State in the Twenty-First Century. M. Williams (Der.), The End of the Developmental State? içinde (s. 1-29). New York: Routledge.
• Windham, P. ve Atta, R. V. (2019). Introduction: DARPA—The Innovation Icon. W. B. Bonvillian, R. V. Atta ve P. Windham (Der.), The DARPA Model for Transformative Technologies: Perspectives on the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency içinde (s. 1-26). OpenBook Publishers. (18.062024 tarihinde https://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0184.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir)