Year 2017, Volume 6 , Issue 4, Pages 294 - 301 2017-12-30

Keystones of research: epistemological and ontological analysis of educational studies

Kübra Keser [1] , Dinçay Köksal [2]


In educational research, it is vital for researchers to have an underlying philosophy and to shape their studies in the borders of a framework. Epistemological and ontological views of the researchers are the key factors affecting the process of research design. Researchers’ perceptions about knowledge and reality are important not only in shaping their research but also reporting the way they use in their research paper. Therefore, this study is designed as an in-depth epistemological and ontological analysis of three selected studies based upon the English Language Teaching classes. For the analysis part, especially the table (see Appendix) reporting different research approaches with different epistemological and ontological views by Guba and Lincoln (1994) were employed. The conclusion drawn from the analysis of these three studies indicate that researchers conduct their studies by basing on one framework or theoretical approach, which best suits for the nature of their research in accordance with the aim of the inquiry.

Epistemology, ontology, educational research, research framework
  • Allison, P., & Pomeroy, E. (2000). How shall we “know?” Epistemological concerns in research in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 23(2), 91-98. Allison, P. (2000). Research from the ground up post expedition adjustment. Cumbria, UK: Brathay Hall. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (No. 10). Penguin UK. Boyatzis, C. J. (1997). Of Power Rangers and V-Chips. Young Children, 52(7), 74-79. Forman, R. (2014). How local teachers respond to the culture and language of a global English as a foreign language textbook. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(1), 72-88. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2 (163-194), 109. Horwitz, E. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27,557-576. Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2002). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. Ethnography and schools: Qualitative approaches to the study of education, 87-138. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and teacher education, 21(8), 899-916. Mori, Y. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning?. Language learning, 49(3), 377-415. Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2), 241-242. O'malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press. Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Rowman & Littlefield. Rifkin, B. (2000). Revising beliefs about foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 394-420. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Tanaka, K. (1999). The development of an instrument to investigate learners’ beliefs about language learning. Unpublished seminar paper, Department of Applied Language Studies and Linguistics, University of Auckland.
Journal Section ELT Research Journal
Authors

Author: Kübra Keser (Primary Author)

Author: Dinçay Köksal

Dates

Application Date : December 1, 2017
Acceptance Date : September 28, 2020
Publication Date : December 30, 2017

APA Keser, K , Köksal, D . (2017). Keystones of research: epistemological and ontological analysis of educational studies . ELT Research Journal , 6 (4) , 294-301 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eltrj/issue/33640/373150