Ontological and Epistemological Foundations of Research: The Analysis of Three Educational Studies

Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 191 - 199, 30.12.2019

Özgür Çelik Dinçay Köksal

Abstract

Ontological and epistemological perspectives constitute the philosophical scaffold of a research study. The main problem of most studies is the inconsistency in the rationale of the studies, in other words, the discrepancy between theory and practice. Identifying the study’s perspective to the truth (ontology) and the knowledge (epistemology) contributes much to the coherence in the rationale of the study. In this respect, this study aims to analyse three selected educational studies from ontological and epistemological perspectives to reveal how the consistency can be achieved relying on the philosophical underpinnings. 

Keywords

ontology, epistemology, research, education, analysis

References

• Bailey, P. (1997). Finding your way around qualitative methods in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(1), 18-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025018.x
• Bar-On, R. (1997a). Development of the Bar-On EQ-I: A Measure of Emotional Intelligence. Paper presented at the 105th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August.Bhaskar, R. (2012). From science to emancipation (pp. 15-16). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
• Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to social enquiry (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
• Brecht, R. D., & Robinson, J. L. (1993). Qualitative Analysis of Second Language Acquisition in Study Abroad: The ACTR/NFLC Project. NFLC Occasional Papers.
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.
• Dukes, S. (1984). Phenomenological methodology in the human sciences. Journal of religion and health, 23(3), 197-203.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
• Killam, L. A. (2013). Research terminology simplified: Paradigms, axiology, ontology, epistemology and methodology. Sudbury, ON: Author.
• Markee, N. (2012). Emic and etic in qualitative research. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.
• Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention. Boston, MA: Springer US.
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures 1. The qualitative report, 11(3), 474-498.
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications
• Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structures of human behavior (2nd ed.). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
• Pishghadam, R. (2009). A quantitative analysis of the relationship between emotional intelligence and foreign language learning. Electronic journal of foreign language teaching, 6.
• Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. SAGE Publication
• Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57-78.
• Walliman, N. (2017). Research methods: The basics. Routledge.