Mechanical analysis of al/foam composite sandwich panels under elastic and elastoplastic states

Abstract

This study performs mechanical analysis for Al/Foam composite sandwich panels under 3-point bending using numerically and experimentally. The flexural rigidity, elastic deflections, and normal, shear stresses are obtained by analytical calculations of the Timoshenko beam equation and compared finite element (FE) models for 3-point bending loading conditions. The FE models are constructed using 2D single-layer shell and 3D solid discrete-layer models. The validity of FE models at the analysis is evaluated for Al/PVC Foam sandwich composites for the elastic state. The experimental bending results of Al/XPS Foam sandwich composites are compared with numerical models at elastic and elastoplastic states. The elastic results indicate that the out-of-plane deflection results agree well across numerical and analytical models. Normal stresses at the core are higher in 3D discrete-layer solid models compared to laminated shell theory-based models for thick plates, due to the more accurate characteristics of the discrete-layer solid models. The Timoshenko beam theory-based analytical bending results show a good correlation with the results from laminated shell theory-based finite element method (FEM) analyses. Elastoplastic FEM analysis indicates that discrete-layer-based 3D solid FEM models effectively predict local effects dependent on indentation failure.

Keywords

• Sandwich Panels
• Timoschenko Beam Theory
• Composite Laminate Modeling
• Discrete Layer Modeling
• Elastic and Elastoplastic Finite Element Analysis.

References

1. Kaw, A. K. (2006). Mechanics of composite materials (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis.
2. Gay, D., Hoa, S. V., & Tsai, S. W. (2003). Composite materials: Design and applications. CRC Press.
3. Tunca, E., & Kafalı, H. (2021). Compression and three-point bending analyses of aerospace sandwich composites produced with polymeric core materials using Ansys. European Journal of Science and Technology, 31(1), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1012658
4. Liew, K. M., Pan, Z. Z., & Zhang, L. W. (2019). An overview of layerwise theories for composite laminates and structures: Development, numerical implementation, and application. Composite Structures, 216, 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.074
5. Matsunaga, H. (2004). A comparison between 2-D single-layer and 3-D layerwise theories for computing interlaminar stresses of laminated composite and sandwich plates subjected to thermal loadings. Composite Structures, 64, 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.08.001
6. Rao, K. P. (1978). A rectangular laminated anisotropic shallow thin shell finite element. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 15(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(78)90003-8
7. Saigal, S., Kapania, R. K., & Yang, T. Y. (1986). Geometrically nonlinear finite element analysis of imperfect laminated shells. Journal of Composite Materials, 20(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838602000206
8. Kreja, I. (2011). A literature review on computational models for laminated composite and sandwich panels. Central European Journal of Engineering, 1(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-011-0005-x

9. Reddy, J. N. (2002). Energy principles and variational methods in applied mechanics. John Wiley and Sons.
10. Pagano, N. J. (1970). Exact solutions for rectangular bidirectional composites and sandwich plates. Journal of Composite Materials, 4(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837000400103
11. Li, D. (2021). Layerwise theories of laminated composite structures and their applications: A review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28, 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09392-2
12. Reddy, J. N. (1987). A generalization of two-dimensional theories of laminated composite plates. Communications in Applied Numerical Methods, 3, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1630030303
13. Yang, C., Chen, J., & Zhao, S. (2013). The interlaminar stress of laminated composite under uniform axial deformation. Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Material Science, 3(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.4236/mnsms.2013.32007
14. Mawenya, A. S., & Davies, J. D. (1974). Finite element bending analysis of multilayer plates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 8, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620080203
15. Reddy, J. N. (1989). On refined computational models of composite laminates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 27, 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620270210
16. Ashby, M. F., Evans, A. G., Fleck, N. A., Gibson, L. J., Hutchinson, J. W., & Wadley, H. N. G. (2000). Metal foams: A design guide. Butterworth Heinemann.
17. Daniel, I. M., Gdoutos, E. E., Wang, K. A., & Abot, J. L. (2002). Failure modes of composite sandwich beams. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 11(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1106/105678902027247
18. Uzay, Ç., & Geren, N. (2020). Failure analysis of low-density polymer foam core sandwich structures under three-point bending loading. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 35(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.764547
19. Staal, R. A. (2006). Failure of sandwich honeycomb panels in bending (PhD thesis). The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
20. Abrate, S., Ferrero, J. F., & Navarro, P. (2015). Cohesive zone models and impact damage predictions for composite structures. Meccanica, 50, 2587–2620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0221-1
21. Höwer, D., Lerch, B. A., Bednarcyk, B. A., Pineda, E. J., Reese, S., & Simon, J. W. (2018). Cohesive zone modeling for mode I facesheet to core delamination of sandwich panels accounting for fiber bridging. Composite Structures, 183, 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.005
22. Eruslu, S. O., & Aydogdu, M. (2009). Vibration analysis of inclusion reinforced composite square plates under various boundary conditions. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 28, 995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844070877
23. Karamanlı, A. (2018). Flexure analysis of laminated composite and sandwich beams using Timoshenko beam theory. Journal of Polytechnic, 21(3), 633–643. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.386958
24. Reddy, J. N. (2004). Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells: Theory and analysis (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
25. McCormack, T. M. (1999). Failure of structural sandwich beams with metallic foam cores (MSc thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States of America.
26. Studzinski, R., Pozorski, Z., & Garstecki, A. (2009). Optimal design of sandwich panels with a soft core. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 47(3), 685–699.
27. Manet, V. (1998). The use of ANSYS to calculate the behavior of sandwich structures. Composites Science and Technology, 58(12), 1899–1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00010-4
28. Kaboglu, C., Yu, L., Mohagheghian, I., Blackman, B. R. K., Kinloch, A. J., & Dear, J. P. (2018). Effects of the core density on the quasi-static flexural and ballistic performance of fiber-composite skin/foam core sandwich structures. Journal of Material Science, 58, 16393–16414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2799-x
29. Çınar, K. (2018). Evaluation of sandwich panels with composite tube-reinforced foam core under bending and flatwise compression. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 22(2), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218798161
30. Eruslu, S. Ö. (2018). The effect of particle type and distribution on bending analysis of glass particle reinforced composite beams. CRPASE: Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, 6, 1–5.
31. Kholkin, A. (2012). Numerical simulation of damage and failure of laminated 3-point bending specimens (PhD thesis). Vienna University of Technology, Austria.
32. Radhakrishnan, G., Breaz, D., Al Hattali, A. H. M. S., Al Yahyai, A. M. N., Al Riyami, A. M. N. O., Al Hadhrami, A. M. D., & Karthikayen, K. R. (2023). Influence of aspect ratio on the flexural and buckling behavior of an aluminum sandwich composite: A numerical and experimental approach. Materials, 16(19), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16196544
33. Alshahrani, A., & Ahmed, A. (2022). Study on flexural behavior of glass fiber reinforced plastic sandwich composites using liquid thermoplastic resin. Polymers, 14(19), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194045
34. Wang, B., Shi, Y., Zhou, C., & Li, T. (2016). Failure mechanism of PMI foam core sandwich beam in bending. International Journal of Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 6, A8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2015008