EN
Building Up Mathematical Modeling Using Spot Welding Parameters and Prediction Weld Nugget by Minitab
Abstract
In serial production, problems are constantly encountered in the selection of welding parameters due to the excess of welding parameters and variations. In order to compensate for these variations, mostly high energy flux is used. In this study, an approach developed in order to estimate weld nugget diameter in determining the welding parameters for sheets with a thickness of 0.6-3 mm is introduced. Minitab statistical program was used to create experimental data and mathematical operations. First of all, 7 source parameters were selected and experimental design (DOE) was carried out for 64 experiments using the ½ partition factorial method in Minitab software. With the experiments, real weld nugget diameters were obtained. These results were transferred to the Minitab software and the mathematical model of the system was established. Weld nugget diameter estimation procedures were carried out using the experimental design (DOE) data. Test and prediction data were transferred to Minitab software, regression graph was drawn and R-Sq and R-Sq (adj) values were calculated. In addition, samples were created with randomly selected data for verification and comparison was made by transferring them to Minitab. According to the results of this study, remarkable accuracy rates have been achieved in the weld nugget diameter estimation with Minitab.
Keywords
References
- Yue, X. K., Tong, G. Q., Chen, F. , Ma, X.L., Gao, X. P. (2016). Optimal welding parameters for small-scale resistance spot welding with response surface methodology. Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining, 22(2):1-7. Doi: 10.1080/13621718.2016.1204799.
- Boersch, I., Füssel, U., Gresch, C., Großmann, C., Hoffmann, B.(2018). A non-destructive method to predict the welding spot diameter by monitoring process parameters. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 99:1085–1099. Doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9847-y.
- Kim, K.Y., Ahmed, F.(2018). Semantic weldability prediction with RSW quality dataset and knowledge construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38:41-53. Doi: org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.05.006.
- Sheikhi, M., Valaee, T.M., Fattah-Alhosseini, A., Usefifar, G.R. (2017). Thermal modeling of resistance spot welding and prediction of weld microstructure. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 48(11):5415-5423. Doi: 10.1007/s11661-017-4314-4.
- Duric, A., Klobčar, D., Milčić, D., Marković, B. (2019). Parameter optimisation and failure load prediction of resistance spot welding of aluminium alloy 57547. Materials Science and Engineering, 659: 012042. Doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/659/1/012042.
- Satonaka, S., Kaieda, K., Okamoto, S. (2004). Prediction of tensile-shear strength of spot welds based on fracture modes. Welding in the World: The International Journal of Materials Joining, 48(5-6):39-45. Doi: org/10.1007/BF03266430.
- Hayat, F. (2011). The effects of the welding current on heat input, nugget geometry, and the mechanical and fractural properties of resistance spot welding on Mg/Al dissimilar materials. Materials and Design, 32(4):2476-2484. Doi: org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.015
- Kim, T., Park, H., Rhee, S. (2005). Optimization of welding parameters for resistance spot welding of TRIP steel with response surface methodology. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 43(21):4643-4657. Doi: 10.1080/00207540500137365.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Mechanical Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 20, 2021
Submission Date
December 8, 2020
Acceptance Date
February 1, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 2