A Short Survey on Currently Used Experimental Setups for Testing Glaucoma Drainage Devices

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 60 - 67, 20.06.2018

Sinan Turhan , Emre Kara , Ahmet İhsan Kutlar , Kıvanç Güngör

https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.356685

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Commonly
used glaucoma drainage devices
have many disadvantageous circumstances especially in postoperative period such
as hypotony, flammation, etc. There are great efforts to overcome these
problems in literature. Researchers have investigated glaucoma drainage devices
by in-vivo, ex-vivo and in-vitro experimental setups and tried to overcome
their disadvantages. In this study, one branch of them, in-vitro experimental
setups currently used in testing of glaucoma drainage devices are surveyed.

Keywords

Glaucoma drainage devices, in-vitro experimental setups, intraocular pressure, microfluidics

References

• [1] Jyoti G.K. (2006). Numerical Solution of Flow Resistance In Outflow Pathway And Intravitreal Drug Delivery In Vitrectomised Eyes Mechanical Engineering. M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University.
• [2] Moon S., Im S., An J., Ju Park C., Kim H. G., Park S. W., Kim H. I., Lee J.H. (2011). Selectively bonded polymeric glaucoma drainage device for reliable regulation of intraocular pressure. Biomed Microdevices, 14:325-335.
• [3] Schwartz K. S., Lee R. K., Gedde S.J., (2006). “Glaucoma drainage implants: critical comparison of types”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 101(5), 872-5.
• [4] Kara, E. (2008). “Design of an alternative glaucoma drainage device using CFD tools”. M.S. Thesis, Universty of Gaziantep.
• [5] DeCroos F.C., Kondo Y., Mordes D., Lee M.R., Ahmad S., Asrani S., Allingham R.R., Olbrich K.C., Klitzman B. (2011) “In vitro fluid Dynamics of the ahmed glaucoma valve modified with expandedpolytetrafluoroethylene”, Current Eye Research, 36:2,112-117.
• [6] Maleki T., Member,IEEE, Chitnis G., Park J.H., Cantor L.B, Ziaie B.,Senior Member, IEEE. (2012). “Biodegradable microfabricated plug-filters for glaucoma drainage devices”,IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Jun;59(6):1507-13.
• [7] Siewert S., Schultze C., Schmidt W., Hinze U., Chichkov B., Wree A., Sternberg K., Allemann R., Guthoff R., Schmitz KP. (2012) “Development of a micro-mechanical valve in a novel glaucoma implant”, Biomed Microdevices. 2012 Oct;14(5):907-20.
• [8] Schmidt W., Quosdorf D., Siewert S., Hinze U., Chichkov B., Brede M., Leder A., Guthoff R., Schmitz K.-P. (2012). “Micro particle-image-velocimetry for characterization of a micro-mechanical valve in a glaucoma implant”, Biomed Tech 2012; 57 (Suppl. 1).
• [9] Siewert s., Schultze C., Schmidt W., Hinze U., Schmitz K.-P. (2010). “Adaptierte biegesteifigkeit und micromechanische ventile in einem neuartigen glaukomimplantat – finite-elemente-analyse und experimentelle untersuchungen, Biomed Tech 2010; 55 (Suppl. 1) DOI 10.1515/ BMT.2010.363
• [10] Paschalis El., Chodosh J., Sperling RA., Salvador-Culia B., Dohlman C., (2013). “A novel implantable glaucoma valve using ferrofluid”, PLoS ONE 8(6): e67404.
• [11] Luong Q.M., Shang L., Kong J.F., Peng Y., Wong T.T., Venkatraman S.S. (2013) “A new design and application of bioelastomers for beter control of intraocular pressure in a glaucoma drainage device”, Adv Healthc Mater. 2014 Feb;3(2):205-13. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201300113. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
• [12] Villamarin A., Roy S., Bigler S., Stergiopulos N., (2014). “ A new adjustable glaucoma drainage device”, Investigate Ophtamology&Visual Science, 55(3), 1848-1852.
• [13] Sheybani A., Reitsamer H., Ahmed I.I.K. (2015) “Fluid Dynamics of a novel micro-fistula implant for the surgical treatment of glaucoma”, Investigate Ophtamology&Visual Science, 56(8), 4789-4795.