EN
Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking
Abstract
One of the disadvantages of electric vehicles that has not yet been overcome is the long battery refueling time. Besides studies to shorten the battery refueling time, increasing the driving range is also a solution to this problem. Different energy saving methods have been tried to increase the driving range. Regenerative braking is one of the best energy-saving methods in electric vehicles. Among several different strategies for regenerative braking, in this study, a fuzzy logic-based regenerative braking strategy is applied to ensure the best regenerative ratio for electric vehicles in any braking case. Moreover, three electric vehicles with different powertrains are modeled in MATLAB/Simulink, and their regenerative braking effectiveness is compared. Inputs of this fuzzy logic controller were determined as the vehicle speed, brake pedal position, and state of charge data; also, three different driving cy-cles are utilized for simulation. These models are equipped with REMY HVH250-115 electric motor and a battery with a capacity of 80 kWh. As a result, the energy-saving amounts are ordered from the best to the worst as all-wheel drive, front-wheel drive, and rear-wheel drive configurations. Furthermore, the average energy-saving in the all-wheel drive configuration is calculated as 19.11%, in the front-wheel drive configuration is calculated as 9.38%, and in the rear-wheel drive configuration is calculated as 7.93%.
Keywords
References
- 1. Ekici, Y. E., & Nusret, T. A. N. (2019). Charge and dis-charge characteristics of different types of batteries on a hybrid electric vehicle model and selection of suitable bat-tery type for electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science and Tech-nology, 3(4), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..527971
- 2. Kunt, M. A. (2020). Advisor Based Modelling of Regen-erative Braking Performance of Electric Vehicles at Dif-ferent Road Slopes. International Journal of Automotive Science and Tech-nology, 4(2), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..717097
- 3. Un-Noor, F., Padmanaban, S., Mihet-Popa, L., Mollah, M.N., Hossain, E. (2017). A Comprehensive Study of Key Electric Ve-hicle (EV) Components, Technologies, Challenges, Impacts, and Future Direction of Develop-ment. Energies , 10, 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081217
- 4. Kıyaklı, A. O., & Solmaz, H. (2018). Modeling of an Electric Vehicle with MATLAB/Simulink. International Journal of Auto-motive Science And Technology, 2(4), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..475477
- 5. D. U. Thakar and R. A. Patel (2019). Comparison of Advance and Conventional Motors for Electric Vehicle Application, 2019 3rd International Conference on Recent Developments in Control, Automation & Power Engi-neering (RDCAPE), NOIDA, India, pp. 137-142, doi: 10.1109/RDCAPE47089.2019.8979092.
- 6. J. Ruan and Q. Song (2019). A Novel Dual-Motor Two-Speed Direct Drive Battery Electric Vehicle Drivetrain, in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 54330-54342, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912994.
- 7. C. A. Bilatiu, S. I . Cosman, R. A. Martis, C. S. Martis and S. Morariu, (2019). Identification and Evaluation of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles Propulsion Systems. 2019 Electric Vehicles In-ternational Conference (EV). doi:10.1109/ev.2019.8892965
- 8. Ghasri, M., Ardeshiri, A., & Rashidi, T. (2019). Per-ceived Ad-vantage in Perspective Application of Integrat-ed Choice and La-tent Variable Model to Capture Electric Vehicles Perceived Ad-vantage from Consumers Perspec-tive. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11606.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Hybrid and Electric Vehicles and Powertrains
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
March 31, 2021
Submission Date
November 14, 2020
Acceptance Date
March 23, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 1 Number: 1
APA
Yurdaer, E., & Kocakulak, T. (2021). Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking. Engineering Perspective, 1(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.29228/sciperspective.47590
AMA
1.Yurdaer E, Kocakulak T. Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking. engineeringperspective. 2021;1(1):11-21. doi:10.29228/sciperspective.47590
Chicago
Yurdaer, Enes, and Tolga Kocakulak. 2021. “Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking”. Engineering Perspective 1 (1): 11-21. https://doi.org/10.29228/sciperspective.47590.
EndNote
Yurdaer E, Kocakulak T (March 1, 2021) Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking. Engineering Perspective 1 1 11–21.
IEEE
[1]E. Yurdaer and T. Kocakulak, “Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking”, engineeringperspective, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–21, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.29228/sciperspective.47590.
ISNAD
Yurdaer, Enes - Kocakulak, Tolga. “Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking”. Engineering Perspective 1/1 (March 1, 2021): 11-21. https://doi.org/10.29228/sciperspective.47590.
JAMA
1.Yurdaer E, Kocakulak T. Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking. engineeringperspective. 2021;1:11–21.
MLA
Yurdaer, Enes, and Tolga Kocakulak. “Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking”. Engineering Perspective, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 11-21, doi:10.29228/sciperspective.47590.
Vancouver
1.Enes Yurdaer, Tolga Kocakulak. Comparison of Energy Consumption of Different Electric Vehicle Power Systems Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Regenerative Braking. engineeringperspective. 2021 Mar. 1;1(1):11-2. doi:10.29228/sciperspective.47590
Cited By
Investigation of the effect of JP-8 fuel and biodiesel fuel mixture on engine performance and emissions by experimental and statistical methods
Energy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124155Integrated Emission and Cost Analysis of Battery-Electric Vehicles up to 2035
Engineering Perspective
https://doi.org/10.64808/engineeringperspective.1753723Energy Management Systems’ Modeling and Optimization in Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Energies
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071696Experimental and statistical investigation of different valve lifts on HCCI combustion, performance and exhaust emissions using response surface method
Energy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123184Comparative Analysis of Single, Double and Quad Electric Vehicle Powertrain Systems
International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology
https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1144339Modified boost converter for renewable energy powered battery charger
International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology
https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1379486