Optimization of concrete sleepers subjected to static and impact loadings

Abstract

Prestressed concrete sleepers play an essential role in the railway track’s performance and safety responses, having an important function of transferring and distributing loads from the track’s superstructure to ballast bed. Cracks on the prestressed concrete sleepers are mainly caused by impact loadings form wheel and rail interactions. Thus, the excessive railway track maintenance cost. The effect and optimization of different prestressed sleeper shape under static and impact loadings has not been previously well investigated. Therefore, this paper focused on the optimization of prestressed concrete sleepers (PCS) shape looking at sleeper safety and sleeper volume. ANSYS 16 was used to analyze the static and impact loading on sleepers. The concrete part of the sleeper was modelled using a three-dimensional solid element, SOLID65 and the pre-stressing wires by truss elements, LINK180, to withstand the initial strain attributed to pre-stressing forces. This paper revealed that irregular hexagon sleeper shape with different width at rail seat and center section having 251 mm and 175 mm center width and height respectively; 281 mm and 200 mm end and rail seat width and height respectively is safe. This paper; thus, point out to irregular hexagonal shape sleeper are more economical and safe unlike the other modelled shapes.

Keywords

• Prestressed concrete sleeper
• static and impact loadings
• ANSYS
• Finite element
• optimization

References

1. 1. Li, D., Kaewunruen, S., & Robery, P. (2017). Creep and shrinkage effects on Railway Prestressed concrete sleepers. First international conference on rail transportation-ICRT 2017, (pp. 1-8). Chengdu, China.
2. 2. Kaewunruen S. & Remennikov A. (2007). Experimental and Numerical Studies of Railway Prestressed Concrete Sleepers Under Static and Impact Loads. Civil Computing, 3, 25-28.
3. 3. Kaewunruen, S., & Remennikov, A. (2013). On the residual energy toughness of prestressed concrete sleepers In railway track structures subjected to repeated impact loads. Electron. J. Struct. Eng., 41-61. engineering, Chalmers University of Technology.
4. 4. S. Kaewunruen. (2007). Experimental and numerical studies for evaluating dynamic behaviour of prestressed concrete sleepers subject to severe impact loading,. PhD thesis, UoW, Aust.,.
5. 5. Desalew, F. (2014). Analysis and Design of Prestressed Concrete Sleeper. Addis Ababa , Ethiopia.: Master's Thesis in Civil Engineering in the Graduate Studies, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa , Ethiopia.
6. 6. Sadeghi, J., & Babaee, A. (2006). Structural Optimization of B70 railway prestressed concrete sleepers. Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Vol.30.,No.B4 School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, LR of Iran.
7. 7. Minoura, S., Wantanabe, T., Sogabe, M., & Gato, K. (2017). Analytical Study on Loading Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Sleeper. Procedia Engineering.
8. 8. Yang, X.-S. (2010). Engineering optimization, an introduction with Metaheuristic applications, . United Kingdom: University of Cambridge, Department of engineering, Cambridge, A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.,PUBLICATION

9. 9. Johan, B. (2002). Railway Safety-Risk and economics,. PhD’s thesis, Department of infrastructure and planning, Royal Institute of Technology, ISSN 1651-0216.
10. 10. AS. (2003). Australian Standard, AS 1085.14 “Railway track materials”, Part 14: “Prestressed Concrete Sleepers”.
11. 11. Rikard G. (2000). Static and dynamic finite element analysis of concrete sleepers. Göteborg, Sweden: Department of structural
12. 12. Corporation, E. R. (2012. ). Ethiopia/Sebeta-Djibouti/Nagad Railway Feasibility Study-Part 1: General Specifications Executive Edition,.
13. 13. Chinese, S. (2002). National Standard of People's Republic of China: Code of Design of Concrete Structures. GB50010-2002.
14. 14. Shan, L. (2012). Railway Sleeper Modelling with Deterministic and Non-deterministic Support Conditions. Master Degree Project.
15. 15. Hong Lim, C., Kaewunruen, S., & Mlilo, N. (2017). Performance of Railway Sleepers with Holes under Impact Loading. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 280., pp 1-6.
16. 16. Ahlebeck, D., Meacham, H., & Prause, R. (1975). The development of Analytical models fro railroad track. Proc., Symposium on Railroad Track Mechanics (A. D. Kerr, ed.),, (pp. pp. 239-261).
17. 17. Jabbar Ali, Z., & Seyed Ali, M. (2016). Study of ballast layer stiffness in railway tracks. pp. 311-318.
18. 18. Bowles, J. (1988). Foundation Analysis and Design. . New York.: Fourth edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, .
19. 19. Ivanov, I., & Corves, B. (2014). Fatigue testing of flexure hinges for the purpose of the development of high-precision micro manipulator. “Mechanical Sciences; department of mechanism theory and dynamics of machines (IGM), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, pp.59-66.