Research Article

Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant

Volume: 5 Number: 1 March 31, 2025

Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant

Abstract

Renewable energy production has been steadily increasing in recent years. Generating energy from renewable sources and making them operational for use is essential. Alongside production, efficiently utilizing these resources is equally important. For efficient use, exploring various alternatives and conducting optimization processes are crucial. Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) allow energy production from low enthalpy temperature sources. By using working fluids with low boiling points, it is possible to create a Rankine cycle at low temperatures. Each system operates under unique regional and environmental conditions, so careful selection of working fluids is necessary. Factors such as heat source temperature and pressure, ambient pressure and temperature, location, and purpose of use cause different fluids to exhibit varying behaviors. In this study, the effects of different working fluids were examined for the Afyon geothermal power plant. The active plant utilizes geothermal water at 110°C and a flow rate of 150 kg/s. The plant's capacity is approximately 2.7 MW. R-134a, a widely used working fluid, serves as the intermediary fluid. Additionally, fluids such as isopentane, n-pentane, isobutane, R-12, and R-32 were tested. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of the system were conducted using these fluids. With R-134a, 2.75 MW of power was generated at a unit energy cost of $0.025/kWh. Among the alternative fluids, isobutane produced 2.95 MW of power with a unit energy cost of $0.016/kWh. The energy efficiencies of the system for R-134a and isobutane were 10.9% and 11.6%, respectively. Similarly, the exergy efficiencies for these fluids were 31.1% and 33.1%, respectively. Although better results can be achieved with certain alternative fluids, the data are insufficient to directly replace the current working fluid in the system. Performing a separate optimization study with these promising fluids will be a critical step in determining the final working fluid.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Lund, J. W., Huttrer, G. W., & Toth, A. N. (2022). Characteristics and trends in geothermal development and use, 1995 to 2020. Geothermics, 105, 102522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102522
  2. 2. Wang, E. H., Zhang, H. G., Fan, B. Y., Ouyang, M. G., Zhao, Y., & Mu, Q. H. (2011). Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery. Energy, 36(5), 3406-3418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.041
  3. 3. Liu, Y., Sun, W., & Liu, X. (2024). Greening the organic Rankine cycles: low-global warming potential working fluids for low-temperature waste heat recovery. International Journal of Exergy, 45(1-2), 126-143. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEX.2024.141686
  4. 4. Li, B., Xie, H., Sun, L., Gao, T., Xia, E., Liu, B., ... & Long, X. (2024). Advanced exergy analysis and multi-objective optimization of dual-loop ORC driven by LNG cold energy and geothermal energy. Renewable Energy, 122164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.122164
  5. 5. Daniarta, S., Imre, A. R., & Kolasiński, P. (2024). A novel approach to district heating: using a two-phase expander in reversible heat pump-Organic Rankine Cycle system. In Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on ORC Power System:(ORC2023) (pp. 169-175). Editorial Universidad de Sevilla. https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/9788447227457
  6. 6. Xia, X., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Yang, C., Sun, T., & Peng, B. (2024). Performance comparison of two ORC-VCR system configurations using pure/mixture working fluids based on multi-objective optimization. Applied Thermal Engineering, 255, 124027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124027
  7. 7. Feng, J., Yan, Y., Zhao, L., & Dong, H. (2024). Energy, Exergy, and Economic Performance Comparison and Parametric Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycles Using Isobutane, Isopentane, and Their Mixtures for Waste Heat Recovery. Energies (19961073), 17(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235893
  8. 8. Liang, Z., Zheng, G., Wu, G., Pan, Z., Hu, Z., Xu, M., & Chen, H. (2024). Thermodynamic performance of organic Rankine cycle based pumped thermal energy storage system with different working fluids. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41052

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Bio-Fluids

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

March 31, 2025

Submission Date

May 4, 2024

Acceptance Date

November 26, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Güler, Ö. F. (2025). Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant. Engineering Perspective, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.80205
AMA
1.Güler ÖF. Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant. engineeringperspective. 2025;5(1):1-8. doi:10.29228/eng.pers.80205
Chicago
Güler, Ömer Faruk. 2025. “Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant”. Engineering Perspective 5 (1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.80205.
EndNote
Güler ÖF (March 1, 2025) Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant. Engineering Perspective 5 1 1–8.
IEEE
[1]Ö. F. Güler, “Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant”, engineeringperspective, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.29228/eng.pers.80205.
ISNAD
Güler, Ömer Faruk. “Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant”. Engineering Perspective 5/1 (March 1, 2025): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.80205.
JAMA
1.Güler ÖF. Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant. engineeringperspective. 2025;5:1–8.
MLA
Güler, Ömer Faruk. “Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant”. Engineering Perspective, vol. 5, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 1-8, doi:10.29228/eng.pers.80205.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Faruk Güler. Working Fluid Selection and Performance Analysis for the Afyon Geothermal Energy Plant. engineeringperspective. 2025 Mar. 1;5(1):1-8. doi:10.29228/eng.pers.80205

Cited By

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiQ2l0ZVNjb3JlMjAyNF9FbmdpbmVlcmluZ19QZXJzcGVjdC5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiZjQ5MS9kN2QzLzViMDYvNjlkNzRiZWUwYmExYTcuODAzMTEyNjkucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc1NzIwOTU4LCJub25jZSI6IjkyMWY0MTE1YjMzZTc0NDdkNDRiMmRmMmM2YTQ1MGI1In0.j7yLFVD_8YWwjGP4Oj-L3qHjk8em4BbumM9vcbW0598