Comparison of Some Characteristic Properties of Natural and Synthetic Calcites as Commercial Fillers
Abstract
In this study, the particle morphology, particle size distribution (PSD), surface area and porosity, bulk density, thermal stability, and surface properties [water contact angle (θwater), surface free energy (SFE), and zeta potential (ZP)] of natural calcite, also known as ground calcium carbonate (GCC: Ground Calcium Carbonate; Nidaşcarb 70), and synthetic calcite, also known as precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC: Precipitated Calcium Carbonate; adaCAL N1) were investigated and compared in detail. In addition, characterization studies were carried out using SEM, PSD analyzer, BET surface area analyzer, mercury porosimeter, TG-DSC, θ measurement, and zeta meter devices. SEM analysis results showed that PCC particles are mostly irregular or spherical aggregates formed by the aggregation of 50-100 nm sized cubic-rhombohedral primary crystal grains and containing porosity, while GCC particles are mostly angular, irregular and blocky solid masses without porosity. Although GCC particles are finer than PCC particles, due to particle morphology, PCC has much higher surface area than GCC. For the same reason, the bulk density of PCC is lower than that of GCC. According to θwater data, the hydrophilic character of PCC is more pronounced than that of GCC. Differences in the particle morphology of the products play a decisive role in their other properties.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Project Number
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- 1. Wypych, G. (2000). Handbook of fillers (2nd ed.). ChemTec Publishing.
- 2. Naydowski, C., Heß, P., Strauch, D., Kuhlmann, R., & Rohleder, J. (2001). Calcium carbonate and its industrial application. In F. W. Tegethoff, J. Rohleder, & E. Kroker (Eds.), Calcium carbonate: From the Cretaceous period into the 21st century (pp. 197–311). Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8245-3
- 3. Jimoh, O. A., Ariffin, K. S., Hussin, H. B., & Temitope, A. E. (2018). Synthesis of precipitated calcium carbonate: A review. Carbonates and Evaporites, 33(2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0341-x
- 4. Gill, R., & Scott, W. (1987). The relative effects of different calcium carbonate filler pigments on optical properties. Tappi Journal, 70(1), 93–99.
- 5. Renaudin, G., Bertrand, A., Dubois, M., Gomes, S., Chevalier, P., & Labrosse, A. (2008). A study of water releases in ground (GCC) and precipitated (PCC) calcium carbonates. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 69(7), 1603–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.12.001
- 6. Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Ban, X., Ji, J., Tian, P., & Yang, Y. (2025). The influence of filler types and content on the curing behavior and properties of a bio-based polyurethane engineered sealant. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 136, 103866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103866
- 7. Ersoy, B., Çiftçi, H., & Evcin, A. (2024). Wettability of polymer materials with different liquids and effect of contact angle test liquids on calculated surface free energy value. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2024.2440417
- 8. Lin, R. Y., Zhang, J. Y., & Zhang, P. X. (2002). Nucleation and growth kinetics in synthesizing nanometer calcite. Journal of Crystal Growth, 245(3–4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01739-6
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Powder and Particle Technology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Bahri Ersoy
*
0000-0002-0075-9039
Türkiye
Hakan Çiftçi
0000-0001-7910-7350
Türkiye
Atilla Evcin
0000-0002-0163-5097
Türkiye
Publication Date
April 29, 2026
Submission Date
February 3, 2026
Acceptance Date
April 23, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 6 Number: 3