Abstract
References
- 1. UN Regulation No. 58 Revision 3, Available at: R058r3e.pdf (unece.org)
- 2. Ron Schindlera, Michael Jänschb, Heiko Johannsenb, András Bálinta, An analysis of European crash data and scenario specifi-cation for heavy truck safety system development within the AEROFLEX project, April 27-30, 2020, Helsinki, Finland
- 3. T L Smith, C Grover, T Gibson, W Donaldson and I Knight, De-velopment of test procedures, limit values, costs and benefits for proposals to improve the performance of rear underrun protec-tion for trucks
- 4. DEKRA Road Safety Report, Available at: DEKRA | Alles im grünen Bereich, 2018
- 5. VOLVO European Accident Research and Safety Report, Avail-able at: http://media1.fahrschule-online.de/sixcms/media.php/6028/European_Accident_Research_and_safety_report_2013.pdf
- 6. S. Pooudom et al., Design and Development of Truck Rear Un-derrun Protection Device, 2019
- 7. John Lambert, George Rechnitzer, Review Of Truck Safety: Stage 1: Frontal, Side And Rear Underrun Protection, ISBN: 0732614937
Abstract
Extensive tests was carried out on the rear protection equipment of a tipper-type silobus semi-trailer. This study includes the design and optimization process of an extensible rear underrun protective device for O4 category semi-trailers. Material selection and structural design features were evaluated within the framework of harmonization with regulation 58 of the European Commission. Design verification was done in 4 stages. Two of them were carried out by computer simulation and the other two were carried out as physical tests. The aim of the study is to increase the safety of the vehicle and other road users in accidents resulting in the under-vehicle entry. Ensuring a rear underrun protective device design that meets the test force requirements found in UNECE R58 is a key performance indicator in research. Also, it is aimed at reducing carbon emissions in vehicles where the rear underrun protective device will be used by providing the regulation conditions at a minimum level, simplifying the rear underrun protective device design, and simplifying the design. The output of the optimization process is that the extensible rear underrun protective device design is strong enough to adapt to regulation conditions and light enough to keep efficiency at the highest level.
References
- 1. UN Regulation No. 58 Revision 3, Available at: R058r3e.pdf (unece.org)
- 2. Ron Schindlera, Michael Jänschb, Heiko Johannsenb, András Bálinta, An analysis of European crash data and scenario specifi-cation for heavy truck safety system development within the AEROFLEX project, April 27-30, 2020, Helsinki, Finland
- 3. T L Smith, C Grover, T Gibson, W Donaldson and I Knight, De-velopment of test procedures, limit values, costs and benefits for proposals to improve the performance of rear underrun protec-tion for trucks
- 4. DEKRA Road Safety Report, Available at: DEKRA | Alles im grünen Bereich, 2018
- 5. VOLVO European Accident Research and Safety Report, Avail-able at: http://media1.fahrschule-online.de/sixcms/media.php/6028/European_Accident_Research_and_safety_report_2013.pdf
- 6. S. Pooudom et al., Design and Development of Truck Rear Un-derrun Protection Device, 2019
- 7. John Lambert, George Rechnitzer, Review Of Truck Safety: Stage 1: Frontal, Side And Rear Underrun Protection, ISBN: 0732614937
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Automotive Safety Engineering |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 2 Issue: 2 |