If
ontological, cosmological, religious experience and moral argument on the
existence of God are valid proofs, or at least to the point of convincing us,
then, the premise “God exists” is correct. If there is no valid argument, that
is, if they do not prove the existence of God, or if we believe that they are
not convincing arguments for us, we are still within the boundaries of the
reason when we said “God exists” and we believed in it. Consequently, in both cases, the premise “God exists”
is within the limits of the reason. While
in the first case the proposition is
rational and affirmed, in the second case it is denied and not irrational.
Journal Section | Discussion |
---|---|
Authors | |
Publication Date | November 20, 2017 |
Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 1 Issue: 1-2 |