Nimodipin ve prednizolonun travmatik fasiyal sinir hasarı üzerine etkisi
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the histopathological effect of nimodipine and prednisolone treatment on an animal model with peripheral facial nerve paralysis generated by clamping.
Methods: Twenty-eight New Zealand originated rabbits with facial nerve paralysis of the buccal branches generated by clamping were divided into four groups of seven each, administered with nimodipine, methylprednisolone and nimodipine-methylprednisolone combination throughout 21 days. The injured neural tissues were investigated histopathologically after treatment regarding perineural fibrosis, collagen degeneration, axonal degeneration, myelin degeneration, Schwann cell proliferation, normal myelin structure, and edema. The groups were compared with each other and with the control group.
Results: Statistically significant difference was determined between nimodipine and control groups regarding increased number of collagen fibers, myelin degeneration, axonal degeneration and myelin structure; between nimodipine and methylprednisolone groups, and between nimodipine and nimodipine-methylprednisolone combination groups regarding edema (p<0.05). Statistically significant data were also found between methylprednisolone and control groups in terms of increased number of collagen fibers, myelin degeneration, axonal degeneration and edema; between nimodipine-methylprednisolone combination and the control groups in terms of increased number of collagen fibers, myelin degeneration, axonal degeneration, normal myelin structure and edema (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Nimodipine and methylprednisolone both have positive effects on traumatic peripheral nerve paralysis with nerve integrity preserved whereas advantage of nimodipine over methylprednisolone cannot be suggested.
Keywords
References
- 1. Proctor B, Nager GT. The facial canal: normal anatomy, variations and anomalies. I. Normal anatomy of the facial canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982;97:33–44.
- 2. Davis RE, Telischi FF. Traumatic facial nerve injuries: review of diagnosis and treatment. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 1995;1:30–41.
- 3. Frostick SP, Yin Q, Kemp GJ. Schwann cells, neurotrophic factors, and peripheral nerve regeneration. Microsurgery 1998;18:397–405.
- 4. Makwana M, Raivich G. Molecular mechanisms in successful peripheral regeneration. FEBS J 2005;272:2628–38.
- 5. Gordon T, Sulaiman O, Boyd GJ. Experimental strategies to promote functional recovery after peripheral nerve injuries. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2003;8:236–50.
- 6. Mendonça AC, Barbieri HC, Mazzer N. Directly applied low intensity direct electric current enhances peripheral nerve regeneration in rat. J Neurosci Methods 2003;129:183–90.
- 7. Gispen WH, Schuurman T, Traber J. Nimodipine and neural plasticity in the peripheral nervous system of adult and aged rats. In: Morad M, Nayler W, Kazda S, Schramm M, editors. The Ca2+ channel: structure, function and implications. Berlin: Springer; 1988. p. 491–502.
- 8. Borgens RB. Voltage gradients and ionic currents in injured and regenerating axons. Adv Neurol 1988;47:51–66.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Tolga Dölen
This is me
İrfan Kaygusuz
This is me
Nusret Akpolat
This is me
Hayrettin Cengiz Alpay
This is me
Erol Keleş
This is me
Turgut Karlıdağ
This is me
Şinasi Yalçın
This is me
Koray Yüksel
This is me
Publication Date
April 30, 2017
Submission Date
July 24, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 7 Number: 1