Research Article

A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations

Volume: 9 Number: 3 December 20, 2019
EN

A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty in terms of graft success rate and hearing gain.

Methods: Medical records of 236 patients (99 females and 137 males) aged 18 to 74 years with chronic otitis media who underwent myringoplasty, between January 2014 and June 2017 were retrospectively compared.   Patients were divided into two groups; microscopic myringoplasty (140 patients), endoscopic myringoplasty (96 patients). Demographic data, pure tone audiometric results preoperatively and 6 months postopera­tively, operation time, hearing gain and graft success rate were evaluated.

Results: The mean operation time was 57.8±9.6 minutes for the endoscopic group and 78.6±17.7 minutes for the microscopic group (p<0.001). The mean preoperative air bone gap (ABG) was 24.1±11.5 dB for the microscopic group and 22.7±9.2 dB for the endoscopic group, whereas the mean postoperative ABG was 11.6±9.9 and 9.8±9.3 dB respectively. Graft success rate was 90.3% (213 patients) for entire group, 89.7% (131 patients) for the microscopic group, and 91.1% (82 patients) for the endoscopic group (p=0.727). The functional success rate (ABG10 dB) was 72.5% (171 patients) in the entire group. The mean hearing gain was 12.4±10.8 and 12.8±9 dB in the microscopic and endoscopic groups respectively. 

Conclusion: Endoscopic technique offers similar graft success and hearing outcomes to microscopic technique along with a shorter operation time. 

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Shea JJ Jr. Vein graft closure of eardrum perforations. J Laryngol Otol. 1960 Jun;74:358-62
  2. 2. Austın DF,Shea JJ Jr. A new system of tympanoplasty using vein graft. Laryngoscope. 1961 Jun;71:596-611
  3. 3. Glasscock ME 3rd, Jackson CG, Nissen AJ, Schwaber MK. Postauricular undersurface tympanic membrane grafting: a follow-up report. Laryngoscope. 1982 Jul;92(7 Pt 1):718-27
  4. 4. Sheehy JL, Anderson RG. Myringoplasty. A review of 472 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980 Jul-Aug;89(4 Pt 1):331-4
  5. 5. Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part II: the study. Laryngoscope. 1997 Dec;107(12 Pt 2):26-36
  6. 6. Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty for Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):796-804
  7. 7. Mer SB, Derbyshire AJ, Brushenko A, Pontarelli DA. Fiberoptic endotoscopes for examining the middle ear. Arch Otolaryngol. 1967 Apr;85(4):387-93 8. Willemot J. Technics of endoscopy and of reproducing the image in otorhinolaryngology. Introduction. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1975;29(2):227-33
  8. 9. Tarabichi M. Endoscopic middle ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Jan;108(1):39-46 10. El-Guindy A. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 1992 Jun;106(6):493-5 11. Raj A, Meher R. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty-A study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Jan;53(1):47-9

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 20, 2019

Submission Date

May 11, 2019

Acceptance Date

June 13, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 9 Number: 3

APA
Güler, İ., & Özcan, M. (2019). A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations. ENT Updates, 9(3), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.576183
AMA
1.Güler İ, Özcan M. A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations. ENT Updates. 2019;9(3):166-171. doi:10.32448/entupdates.576183
Chicago
Güler, İsmail, and Müge Özcan. 2019. “A Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Techniques for the Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforations”. ENT Updates 9 (3): 166-71. https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.576183.
EndNote
Güler İ, Özcan M (December 1, 2019) A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations. ENT Updates 9 3 166–171.
IEEE
[1]İ. Güler and M. Özcan, “A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations”, ENT Updates, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 166–171, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.32448/entupdates.576183.
ISNAD
Güler, İsmail - Özcan, Müge. “A Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Techniques for the Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforations”. ENT Updates 9/3 (December 1, 2019): 166-171. https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.576183.
JAMA
1.Güler İ, Özcan M. A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations. ENT Updates. 2019;9:166–171.
MLA
Güler, İsmail, and Müge Özcan. “A Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Techniques for the Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforations”. ENT Updates, vol. 9, no. 3, Dec. 2019, pp. 166-71, doi:10.32448/entupdates.576183.
Vancouver
1.İsmail Güler, Müge Özcan. A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations. ENT Updates. 2019 Dec. 1;9(3):166-71. doi:10.32448/entupdates.576183