Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Relationship between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

Year 2020, , 355 - 360, 25.08.2020
https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.753411

Abstract

Objective: To compare intact and diseased ears for Eustachian tube (ET) length and width in patients with unilateral chronic otitis media (COM), and to assess the relationship between cholesteatoma spread, stapes erosion, lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) fistula and ET width and length retrospectively.
Methods: Subjects with unilateral COM (122 subjects with 244 ears) who underwent surgery for cholesteatoma were evaluated retrospectively for this study. The width of the distal orifice of the bony segment and the length of the bony segment of the ET for both the diseased and healthy ear were measured. Subjects’ healthy and diseased ears were compared for ET length and width. The diseased sides were compared to assess the relationship between ET dimensions and cholesteatoma spread, stapes erosion and LSCC fistula.
Results: The mean ET length and width in healthy and diseased ears was 11.38±1.7 and 1.43±0.37 mm, and 10.99±1.6 and 1.27±0.35 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). No significant differences were found in terms of ET length and width between the subjects with and without stapes erosion and LSCC fistula (p=0.765, p=0.573, and p=0.436, p=0.790, respectively). No significant relation was found between cholesteatoma spread and ET length and width (p=0.647).
Conclusion: ET dysfunction is frequently associated with COM. Chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma is significantly related to ET length and width. Measurement of ET length and width in CT scans is a basic method that can be used in clinical practice.

Supporting Institution

none

Project Number

none

Thanks

We would like to thank Mr. David F. Chapman for editing the English of this article.

References

  • 1. Kurtgöz S, Kökten N, Tekin M. Assessment of nasal airway resistances and nasal mucociliary activities of patients with unilateral chronic otitis media by acoustic rhinometry and saccharin test. Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134:898-903.
  • 2. Fireman P. Otitis media and nasal disease: a role for allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:917-26.
  • 3. Gencer ZK, Özkiriş M, Okur A, Karaçavus S, Saydam L. The possible associations of septal deviation on mastoid pneumatization and chronic otitis. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:1052-7.
  • 4. Verhoeff M, van der Veen EL, Rovers MM, Sanders EA, Schilder AG. Chronic suppurative otitis media: a review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:1-12.
  • 5. Tos M, Stangerup SE, Hvid G. Mastoid pneumatization. Evidence of the environmental theory. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:502-7.
  • 6. Khalil HM, Saleh MA, Sakr AA. A clinico-radiological study of the contralateral ear in acquired unilateral cholesteatoma. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2004;125:17-22.
  • 7. Sadé J, Avraham S, Brown M. Atelectasis, retraction pockets and cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 1981;92:501-12.
  • 8. Min HJ, Kim SG, Jung JH, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Park CW. Epitympanic Development and Mastoid Pneumatization in Chronic Otitis Media with and without Cholesteatoma. [Article in Korean] Korean J Audol 2011;15:25-31.
  • 9. Chauhan B, Chauhan K. A comparative study of eustachian tube functions in normal and diseased ears with tympanometry and videonasopharyngoscopy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65:468-76.
  • 10. Dinç AE, Damar M, Uğur MB, et al. Do the angle and length of the eustachian tube influence the development of chronic otitis media? Laryngoscope 2015;125:2187-92.
  • 11. Paltura C, Can TS, Yilmaz BK, Dinç ME, Develioğlu ÖN, Külekçi M. Eustachian tube diameter: Is it associated with chronic otitis media development? Am J Otolaryngol 2017;38:414-6.
  • 12. Shim HJ, Choi AY, Yoon SW, Kwon KH, Yeo SG. The Value of Measuring Eustachian Tube Aeration on Temporal Bone CT in Patients with Chronic Otitis Media. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2010;3:59-64.
  • 13. Doyle WJ, Swarts JD. Eustachian tube-tensor veli palatini muscle-cranial base relationships in children and adults: an osteological study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:986-90.
  • 14. Takasaki K, Sando I, Balaban CD, Miura M. Functional anatomy of the tensor veli palatini muscle and Ostmann's fatty tissue. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:1045-9.
  • 15. Takasaki K, Takahashi H, Miyamoto I, et al. Measurement of angle and length of the eustachian tube on computed tomography using the multiplanar reconstruction technique. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1251-4.
  • 16. Habesoglu TE, Habesoglu M, Bolukbasi S, et al. Does auditory tube angle really affect childhood otitis media and size of the mastoid? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:747-9.
  • 17. Hashimoto K, Yanagihara N, Hyodo J, Sakagami M. Osseous eustachian tube and peritubal cells in patients with unilateral cholesteatoma comparison between healthy and diseased sides using high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:776-81.
Year 2020, , 355 - 360, 25.08.2020
https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.753411

Abstract

Project Number

none

References

  • 1. Kurtgöz S, Kökten N, Tekin M. Assessment of nasal airway resistances and nasal mucociliary activities of patients with unilateral chronic otitis media by acoustic rhinometry and saccharin test. Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134:898-903.
  • 2. Fireman P. Otitis media and nasal disease: a role for allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:917-26.
  • 3. Gencer ZK, Özkiriş M, Okur A, Karaçavus S, Saydam L. The possible associations of septal deviation on mastoid pneumatization and chronic otitis. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:1052-7.
  • 4. Verhoeff M, van der Veen EL, Rovers MM, Sanders EA, Schilder AG. Chronic suppurative otitis media: a review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:1-12.
  • 5. Tos M, Stangerup SE, Hvid G. Mastoid pneumatization. Evidence of the environmental theory. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:502-7.
  • 6. Khalil HM, Saleh MA, Sakr AA. A clinico-radiological study of the contralateral ear in acquired unilateral cholesteatoma. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2004;125:17-22.
  • 7. Sadé J, Avraham S, Brown M. Atelectasis, retraction pockets and cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 1981;92:501-12.
  • 8. Min HJ, Kim SG, Jung JH, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Park CW. Epitympanic Development and Mastoid Pneumatization in Chronic Otitis Media with and without Cholesteatoma. [Article in Korean] Korean J Audol 2011;15:25-31.
  • 9. Chauhan B, Chauhan K. A comparative study of eustachian tube functions in normal and diseased ears with tympanometry and videonasopharyngoscopy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65:468-76.
  • 10. Dinç AE, Damar M, Uğur MB, et al. Do the angle and length of the eustachian tube influence the development of chronic otitis media? Laryngoscope 2015;125:2187-92.
  • 11. Paltura C, Can TS, Yilmaz BK, Dinç ME, Develioğlu ÖN, Külekçi M. Eustachian tube diameter: Is it associated with chronic otitis media development? Am J Otolaryngol 2017;38:414-6.
  • 12. Shim HJ, Choi AY, Yoon SW, Kwon KH, Yeo SG. The Value of Measuring Eustachian Tube Aeration on Temporal Bone CT in Patients with Chronic Otitis Media. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2010;3:59-64.
  • 13. Doyle WJ, Swarts JD. Eustachian tube-tensor veli palatini muscle-cranial base relationships in children and adults: an osteological study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:986-90.
  • 14. Takasaki K, Sando I, Balaban CD, Miura M. Functional anatomy of the tensor veli palatini muscle and Ostmann's fatty tissue. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:1045-9.
  • 15. Takasaki K, Takahashi H, Miyamoto I, et al. Measurement of angle and length of the eustachian tube on computed tomography using the multiplanar reconstruction technique. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1251-4.
  • 16. Habesoglu TE, Habesoglu M, Bolukbasi S, et al. Does auditory tube angle really affect childhood otitis media and size of the mastoid? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:747-9.
  • 17. Hashimoto K, Yanagihara N, Hyodo J, Sakagami M. Osseous eustachian tube and peritubal cells in patients with unilateral cholesteatoma comparison between healthy and diseased sides using high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:776-81.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Otorhinolaryngology
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Filiz Gülüstan 0000-0003-4857-214X

Selçuk Güneş 0000-0001-9458-5799

Ömer Yıldız This is me 0000-0003-4774-9281

Mine Yazıcı 0000-0002-4164-3438

Mehmet Abakay This is me 0000-0003-0413-421X

Ercan İnci This is me 0000-0002-3791-2471

İbrahim Sayın 0000-0003-3388-7835

Project Number none
Publication Date August 25, 2020
Submission Date June 16, 2020
Acceptance Date August 10, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Gülüstan, F., Güneş, S., Yıldız, Ö., Yazıcı, M., et al. (2020). Relationship between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. ENT Updates, 10(2), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.753411
AMA Gülüstan F, Güneş S, Yıldız Ö, Yazıcı M, Abakay M, İnci E, Sayın İ. Relationship between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. ENT Updates. August 2020;10(2):355-360. doi:10.32448/entupdates.753411
Chicago Gülüstan, Filiz, Selçuk Güneş, Ömer Yıldız, Mine Yazıcı, Mehmet Abakay, Ercan İnci, and İbrahim Sayın. “Relationship Between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma”. ENT Updates 10, no. 2 (August 2020): 355-60. https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.753411.
EndNote Gülüstan F, Güneş S, Yıldız Ö, Yazıcı M, Abakay M, İnci E, Sayın İ (August 1, 2020) Relationship between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. ENT Updates 10 2 355–360.
IEEE F. Gülüstan, S. Güneş, Ö. Yıldız, M. Yazıcı, M. Abakay, E. İnci, and İ. Sayın, “Relationship between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma”, ENT Updates, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 355–360, 2020, doi: 10.32448/entupdates.753411.
ISNAD Gülüstan, Filiz et al. “Relationship Between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma”. ENT Updates 10/2 (August 2020), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.753411.
JAMA Gülüstan F, Güneş S, Yıldız Ö, Yazıcı M, Abakay M, İnci E, Sayın İ. Relationship between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. ENT Updates. 2020;10:355–360.
MLA Gülüstan, Filiz et al. “Relationship Between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma”. ENT Updates, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, pp. 355-60, doi:10.32448/entupdates.753411.
Vancouver Gülüstan F, Güneş S, Yıldız Ö, Yazıcı M, Abakay M, İnci E, Sayın İ. Relationship between Eustachian Tube Dimensions and Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. ENT Updates. 2020;10(2):355-60.