Shear bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems to zirconia infrastructures

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: Disk-shaped zirconia samples (N = 50) were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to repairing system type. Each repair system was applied to the zirconium samples and a hybrid composite was used for repairing. Shear bond testing of all groups was carried out using a universal testing machine after thermocycling. Results: Repair systems demonstrated no significant difference in repairing zirconia except Single Bond. Single Bond was the weakest in repairing the infrastructures. The highest and lowest mean bond strength values for the zirconia groups were 18,91 MPa and 3,63 MPa, respectively. Conclusion: The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.

Keywords

• Repair system
• zirconia
• shear bond
• adhesive system
• bond failure

References

1. 1. Kelsey WP 3rd, Latta MA, Stanislav CM, Shaddy RS Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives. Gen Dent 2000;48:418-21. PMID: 11199616 google scholar
2. 2. Tulunoglu IF, Beydemir B. Resin shear strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy using two polymerization schemes. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:181-6. google scholar
3. 3. Sced IR, McLean JW. The strength of metal/ceramic bonds with base metals containing chromium. A preliminary report. Br Dent J 1972;132:232-4. google scholar
4. 4. Prado RA, Panzeri H, Fernandes Neto AJ, Neves FD, Silva MR, Mendonca G Shear bond strength of dental porcelains to nickel-chromium alloys. Braz Dent J 2005;16:202-6. google scholar
5. 5. Ikemura K, Tanaka H, Fujii T et al. Development of a new single-bottle multi-purpose primer for bonding to dental porcelain, alumina, zirconia, and dental gold alloy. Dent Mater J 2011; 30:478-84. google scholar
6. 6. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB et al. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:1233-39. google scholar
7. 7. Lee SJ, Cheong CW, Wright RF, et al. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain. J Prosthodont 2014;23: 112-6. google scholar
8. 8. Della Bona A, Mecholsky JJ, Jr, Barrett AA, et al. Characterization of glass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:1568-74. google scholar

9. 9. Kirmali O, Kapdan A, Harorli OT, Barutcugil C, Ozarslan MM. Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:28-32. google scholar
10. 10. Gordon SR, Lloyd PM Fixed prosthodontics in the elderly population. Life expectancy of fixed restorations, failures, and retreatment methods. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:783-95. google scholar
11. 11. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:416-21. google scholar
12. 12. Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and loadcycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:130-7. google scholar
13. 13. Ozcan M. >Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:265-9. google scholar
14. 14. Casucci A, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. Effect of surface pre-treatments on the zirconia ceramic-resin cement microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 2011 Oct;27(10):1024-30. google scholar
15. 15. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:8-13. google scholar
16. 16. Burke FJ. Repair of metal-ceramic restorations using an abrasive silica-impregnating technique: two case reports. Dent Update 2002;29:398-402. google scholar
17. 17. dos Santos JG, Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, et al. Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:165-73. google scholar
18. 18. Kim BK, Bae HE, Shim JS, et al. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:165-73. google scholar
19. 19. Ozcan M, van der Sleen JM, Kurunmaki H, et al. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic-fused-to-metal crowns. J Prosthodont 2006;15:283-8. google scholar
20. 20. Kimmich M. Stappert CF. Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations: a review and clinical application. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:31-44. google scholar
21. 21. Yoo JY, Yoon HI, Park JM, Park EJ. Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:343-8. google scholar
22. 22. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99. google scholar
23. 23. Dündar M, Ozcan M, Gökçe B, Cömlekoğlu E, Leite F, Valandro LF. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dent Mater 2007;23:630-6. google scholar
24. 24. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER, Louie PW, Shinkewski DJ. The effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent 1993;18:61-5. google scholar
25. 25. Schneider, W. Powers, J.M. & T Pierpoint, H.P. Bond strength of composites to etched and silica coated porcelain fusing alloys. Dent Mater 1992;8:211-5. google scholar
26. 26. Matsumara H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:315-9. google scholar
27. 27. Kocaagaoglu HH, Gürbulak A. An assessment of shear bond strength between ceramic repair systems and different ceramic infrastructures. Scanning 2015;37:300-5. google scholar
28. 28. Ohkuma K, K.azama M, Ogura H. The grinding efficiency by diamond points developed for yttria partially stabilized zirconia. Dent Mater J 2011;30:511-6. google scholar
29. 29. Barragan G, Chasquiera F, Arantes-Olivera S. Portugal J. Ceramic repair: influence of chemical and mechanical surface conditioning on adhesion to zirconia. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014;13:155-8. google scholar
30. 30. Han IN, Kang DW, Chung CH, Choe HC, Kyoung M. Effect of various intraoral repair systems on the shear bond strength of composite resin to zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:248-55. google scholar
31. 31. Kocaagaoglu H, Manav T, Albayrak H. In Vitro Comparison of the Bond Strength between Ceramic Repair Systems and Ceramic Materials and Evaluation of the Wettability. J Prosthodont 2017;26:238-43. google scholar
32. 32. Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y, Manabe A, Miyazaki T. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on Zirconia. J Dent Res 2008;87:666-70. google scholar
33. 33. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr. New Zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements.Dent Mater 2010;26:345-52. google scholar
34. 34. Cura C, Ozcan M, Isik G, Saracoglu A. Comparison of alternative adhesive cementation concepts for Zirconia ceramic: Glaze layer vs Zirconia primer. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:75-82. google scholar
35. 35. Koizumi H, Nakayama D, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H Bonding of resin-based luting cements to Zirconia with and without the use of ceramic priming agents. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:385-92. google scholar
36. 36. Attia A, Kem M. Long-term resin bonding to Zirconia ceramic with a new universal primer. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:319-27. google scholar
37. 37. Ural C, Külünk T, Külünk S, Kurt M, Baba S. Determination of resin bond strength to, Zirconia ceramic surface using different primers. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:48-53. google scholar
38. 38. Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Zhu L, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to Zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010;26:426-32. google scholar
39. 39. Lehmann F, Kern M. Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic using different primers. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11:479-83. google scholar
40. 40. P.C. Pott, M. Stiesch, M. Eisenburger, Influence of artificial aging on the shear bond strength of zirconiacomposite interfaces after pretreatment with new 10-MDP adhesive systems. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques 2018;10:308-14. google scholar
41. 41. Lindgren J, Smeds J, Sjögren G. The effect of surface treatments and aging in water on bond strength to Zirconia. Oper Dent 2008;33:675-81. google scholar
42. 42. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences Zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009;88:817-22. google scholar
43. 43. Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydin M. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a Zirconia post and a composite resin core material. J Prosthet Dent 2008 May;99:388-99. google scholar
44. 44. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to Zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: Where are we now? Dent. Mater 2011;27:71-82. google scholar
45. 45. Attia A, Lehmann F, Kern M. Influence of surface conditioning and cleaning methods on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2011; 27:207-13. google scholar
46. 46. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008 Nov;27:849-55. google scholar