Research Article

Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems

Volume: 53 Number: 1 January 31, 2019
  • Fatih Çakıcı
  • Elif Bahar Çakıcı *
  • Burak Sadık
  • Ali Keleş
  • Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci
EN

Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks
comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc,
and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography.
Subjects and Methods
Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimental
groups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system.
Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of
13.68 μm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newly
formed dentinal microcracks.
Results
The Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrack
formation than the ProTaper Next group (p < 0.001). There were also significant
differences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-Adjusting
File groups (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formed
microcraks compared to ProTaper Next system.

Keywords

References

  1. Kansal R, Rajput A, Talwar S, Roongta R, Verma M. Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files. J Endod 2014;40(9):1443-6. [CrossRef ]
  2. Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997;23(8):533-4. [CrossRef ]
  3. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2012;38(2):232-5. [CrossRef ]
  4. Burklein S, Tsotsis P, Schafer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013;39(4):501-4. [CrossRef ]
  5. Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD. The shaping movement: fifthgeneration technology. Dent Today 2013;32(4):94, 96-9.
  6. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The selfadjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy- -a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010;36(4):679-90. [CrossRef ]
  7. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R, Zary R, Paque F, Hulsmann M. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010;36(4):697-02. [CrossRef ]
  8. De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Marins J, et al. Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems. J Endod 2014;40(9):1447-50. [CrossRef ]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Fatih Çakıcı This is me
0000-0002-8147-2661
Türkiye

Elif Bahar Çakıcı * This is me
0000-0002-5769-0239
Türkiye

Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci This is me
0000-0002-9619-545X

Publication Date

January 31, 2019

Submission Date

May 17, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 53 Number: 1

APA
Çakıcı, F., Çakıcı, E. B., Sadık, B., Keleş, A., & Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci, F. (2019). Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems. European Oral Research, 53(1), 21-24. https://izlik.org/JA26WD26ZY
AMA
1.Çakıcı F, Çakıcı EB, Sadık B, Keleş A, Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci F. Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems. EOR. 2019;53(1):21-24. https://izlik.org/JA26WD26ZY
Chicago
Çakıcı, Fatih, Elif Bahar Çakıcı, Burak Sadık, Ali Keleş, and Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci. 2019. “Comparison of Newly Formed Microcracks After Instrumentation Using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File Systems”. European Oral Research 53 (1): 21-24. https://izlik.org/JA26WD26ZY.
EndNote
Çakıcı F, Çakıcı EB, Sadık B, Keleş A, Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci F (January 1, 2019) Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems. European Oral Research 53 1 21–24.
IEEE
[1]F. Çakıcı, E. B. Çakıcı, B. Sadık, A. Keleş, and F. Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci, “Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems”, EOR, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 21–24, Jan. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA26WD26ZY
ISNAD
Çakıcı, Fatih - Çakıcı, Elif Bahar - Sadık, Burak - Keleş, Ali - Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci, Funda. “Comparison of Newly Formed Microcracks After Instrumentation Using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File Systems”. European Oral Research 53/1 (January 1, 2019): 21-24. https://izlik.org/JA26WD26ZY.
JAMA
1.Çakıcı F, Çakıcı EB, Sadık B, Keleş A, Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci F. Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems. EOR. 2019;53:21–24.
MLA
Çakıcı, Fatih, et al. “Comparison of Newly Formed Microcracks After Instrumentation Using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File Systems”. European Oral Research, vol. 53, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 21-24, https://izlik.org/JA26WD26ZY.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Çakıcı, Elif Bahar Çakıcı, Burak Sadık, Ali Keleş, Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci. Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems. EOR [Internet]. 2019 Jan. 1;53(1):21-4. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA26WD26ZY