Adhesive strength of fiberglass posts treated with thio-urethane-based experimental silanes

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the adhesive bond strength of fiberglass posts treated with experimental silanes based on thio-urethane and submitted to thermo and mechanical cycles. Materials and Methods Bovine roots were divided into six groups: RX-RU2 (RelyX CP + RelyX U200); PETMP-HDDI-RU2 (PETMP-HDDI + RelyX U200); PETMP-BDI-RU2 (PETMP-BDI + RelyX U200); RX-RU (RelyX CP + RelyX Ultimate); PETMP-HDDI-RU (PETMP-HDDI + RelyX Ultimate); PETMP-BDI-RU (PETMP-BDI + RelyX Ultimate). One slice from each root third (n=10) was submitted to the push-out test and the values evaluated with R Program statistical analysis, while the failure pattern assessed in percentage. Results Among root thirds, RX-RU2 promoted greater strength at the cervical and apical thirds; PETMP-HDDI-RU2 showed highest values at the three thirds; and PETMP-BDI-RU2 was strongest at the apical third. RX-RU presented higher strength at the apical third, and PETMP-HDDI-RU and PETMP-BDI-RU had similar values at the three thirds. In each root third, PETMP-HDDI-RU2 showed similar strength at all thirds, and similar strength at the apical third was observed for other associations. Mixed and adhesive failures predominated. Conclusion Experimental silanes promoted different bond strength values in the adhesion of fiberglass posts to the root thirds, with better results for PETMP-HDDI silane. The root region did not influence the failure pattern and most slices showed mixed (MCDP) or adhesive (ADP) failure.

Keywords

• Fiberglass post
• Experimental silane
• Resin cement
• Adhesive strength
• Failure pattern

References

1. 1. Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent 2012; 40:312-21. [CrossRef] google scholar
2. 2. Moraes A, Sarkis-Onofre R, Moraes R, Cenci MS, Soares CJ, Pereira-Cenci T. Can silanization increase the retention of glass-fiber posts? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2015;40:567-80. [CrossRef] google scholar
3. 3. Tanoue N, Koishi Y, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Properties of dual-curable luting composites polymerized with single and dual curing modes. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1015-21. [CrossRef] google scholar
4. 4. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28:3757-85. [CrossRef] google scholar
5. 5. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20: 963-71. [CrossRef] google scholar
6. 6. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80. [CrossRef] google scholar
7. 7. Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2014;39:E31-44. [CrossRef] google scholar
8. 8. Bacchi A, Consani RL, Martim GC, Pfeifer CS. Thio-urethane oligomers improve the properties of light-cured resin cements. Dent Mater 2015;31:565-74. [CrossRef] google scholar

9. 9. Bacchi A, Yih JA, Platta J, Knight J, Pfeifer CS. Shrinkage/stress reduction and mechanical properties improvement in restorative composites formulated with thio-urethane oligomers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;78:235-40. [CrossRef] google scholar
10. 10. Consani RLX, De Paula AB, Fugolin APP, Pfeifer CS. Effect of the combination of a crosslinking agent and a thiourethane additive on the properties of acrylic denture bases processed with microwave energy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019;98:90-5. [CrossRef] google scholar
11. 11. Pfeifer C, Lewis S. Thio-urethane oligomers as low-stress, tough additives in methacrylate polymerizations. IADR; 2012 (Abstract). google scholar
12. 12. Pomini MC, Machado MM, Quadros GP, Gomes GM, Pinheiro LOB, Samra APB. In vitro fracture resistance and bond strength of self-adhesively luted cast metal and fiber-reinforced composite posts and cores: Influence of ferrule and storage time. Int J Prosthodont 2019; 32:205-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
13. 13. El Mourad AM. Assessment of bonding effectiveness of adhesive materials to tooth structure using bond strength test methods: A review of literature. Open Dent J 2018;12:664-78. [CrossRef] google scholar
14. 14. International Organization for Standardization. ISO TR11405: Dental materials - guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2014. google scholar
15. 15. Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2019. google scholar
16. 16. Soares CJ, Santana FR, Castro CG, Paulo C F Santos-Filho, Paulo V Soares, Fang Qian, et al. Finite element analysis and bond strength of a glass post to intraradicular dentin: comparison between microtensile and push-out tests. Dent Mater 2008;24:1405-11. [CrossRef] google scholar
17. 17. Başaran G, Göncü Başaran E, Ayna E, Değer Y, Ayna B, Tuncer MC. Microtensile bond strength of root canal dentin treated with adhesive and fiber-reinforced post systems. Braz Oral Res 2019;33:e027. [CrossRef] google scholar
18. 18. FerrariM, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000;13:255-60. google scholar
19. 19. Demiryürek EO, Külünk S, Saraç D, Yüksel G, Bulucu B. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e74-80. [CrossRef] google scholar
20. 20. Li XJ, Zhao SJ, Niu LN, Tay FR, Jiao K, Gao Y, et al. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals. J Dent 2014;42: 75-83. [CrossRef] google scholar
21. 21. Freitas TL, Vitti RP, Miranda ME, Brandt WC. Effect of glass fiber post adaptation on push-out bond strength to root dentin. Braz Dent J 2019;30:350-5. [CrossRef] google scholar
22. 22. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001;27:321-4. [CrossRef] google scholar
23. 23. Kremeier K, Fasen L, Klaiber B, Hofmann N. Influence of endodontic post type (Glass fiber, quartz fiber or gold) and luting material on push-out bond strength to dentin in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24:660-6. [CrossRef] google scholar
24. 24. Suzuki T, Finger WJ. Dentin adhesives: site of dentin vs. bonding of composite resins. Dent Mater 1988;4:379-83. [CrossRef] google scholar
25. 25. Ekambaram M, Yiu CKY, Matinlinna JP. Bonding of adhesive resin to intraradicular dentine: A review of the literature. Int J Adhes Adhes 2015;60:92-103. [CrossRef] google scholar
26. 26. Macedo VC, Faria e Silva AL, Martins LRM. Effect of cement type, relining procedure, and length of cementation on pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Endod 2010;36:1543-6. [CrossRef] google scholar
27. 27. Rodrigues RV, Sampaio CS, Pacheco RR, Pascon FM, Puppin-Rontani RM, Giannini M. Influence of adhesive cementation systems on the bond strength of relined fiber posts to root dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:493-9. [CrossRef] google scholar
28. 28. Nihei T. Dental applications for silane coupling agents. J Oral Sci 2016;58:151-5. [CrossRef] google scholar
29. 29. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-7. google scholar
30. 30. Cramer NB, Couch CL, Schreck KM, Boulden JE, Wydra R, Stansbury JW, et al. Properties of methacrylate-thiol-ene formulations as dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 2010; 26:799-806. [CrossRef] google scholar
31. 31. Bacchi A, Pfeifer CS. Rheological and mechanical properties and interfacial stress development of composite cements modified with thio-urethane oligomers. Dent Mater 2016;32:978-86. [CrossRef] google scholar
32. 32. Hoyle CE, Bowman CN, Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew Chem 2010; 49:1540-73. [CrossRef] google scholar
33. 33. Oliveira AS, Ramalho ES, Ogliari FA, Moraes RR. Bonding self-adhesive resin cements to glass fibre posts: to silanate or not silanate? Int Endod J 2011;44:759-63. [CrossRef] google scholar
34. 34. D’Arcangelo C, D’Amario M, Prosperi GD, Cinelli M, Giannoni M, Caputi S. Effect of surface treatments on tensile bond strength and on morphology of quartz-fiber posts. J Endod 2007;33:264-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
35. 35. Lazari PC, Oliveira RC, Anchieta RB, Almeida EO, Freitas Junior AC, Sidney Kina S, et al. Stress distribution on dentin-cement-post interface varying root canal and glass fiber post diameters. A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on micro-CT data. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:511-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
36. 36. Bosso K, Gonini Junior A, Guiraldo RD, Berger SB, Lopes MB. Stress generated by customized glass fiber posts and other types by photoelastic analysis. Braz Dent J 2015;26: 222-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
37. 37. Valdivia AD, Raposo LH, Simamoto-Junior PC, Novais VR, Soares JC. The effect of fiber post presence and restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary incisors: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:147-57. [CrossRef] google scholar