Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 53 Issue: 1, 21 - 24, 31.01.2019

Abstract

References

  • Kansal R, Rajput A, Talwar S, Roongta R, Verma M. Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files. J Endod 2014;40(9):1443-6. [CrossRef ]
  • Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997;23(8):533-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2012;38(2):232-5. [CrossRef ]
  • Burklein S, Tsotsis P, Schafer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013;39(4):501-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD. The shaping movement: fifthgeneration technology. Dent Today 2013;32(4):94, 96-9.
  • Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The selfadjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy- -a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010;36(4):679-90. [CrossRef ]
  • Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R, Zary R, Paque F, Hulsmann M. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010;36(4):697-02. [CrossRef ]
  • De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Marins J, et al. Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems. J Endod 2014;40(9):1447-50. [CrossRef ]
  • De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, et al. Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment on the Effect of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive Systems on Dentinal Cracks. J Endod 2015;41(7):1116-9. [CrossRef ]
  • Ceyhanli KT, Erdilek N, Tatar I, Celik D. Comparison of ProTaper, RaCe and Safesider instruments in the induction of dentinal microcracks: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J 2016;49(7):684-9. [CrossRef ]
  • Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, Shemesh H. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod 2013;39(8):1054-6. [CrossRef ]
  • Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Uysal B. Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin. J Endod 2014;40(9):1482-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Karatas E, Gunduz HA, Kirici DO, Arslan H, Topcu MC, Yeter KY. Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments. J Endod 2015;41(2):261-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, Velmurugan N. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. Int Endod J 2014;47(7):622-7. [CrossRef ]
  • Ustun Y, Aslan T, Sagsen B, Kesim B. The effects of different nickeltitanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation. Eur J Dent 2015;9(1):41-6. [CrossRef ]
  • Hin ES, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Shemesh H. Effects of selfadjusting file, Mtwo, and ProTaper on the root canal wall. J Endod 2013;39(2):262-4. [CrossRef ]

Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems

Year 2019, Volume: 53 Issue: 1, 21 - 24, 31.01.2019

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of the present study is to assess the rate of newly formed microcracks
comparatively during root canal instrumentation by using ProTaper Next, Reciproc,
and Self-Adjusting File systems using micro-computed tomography.
Subjects and Methods
Thirty mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly assigned to 3 experimental
groups (n = 10) as follows, ProTaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File system.
Preoperative and postoperative scans were obtained at the isotropic resolution of
13.68 μm. Cross-section images were examined to identify the presence of newly
formed dentinal microcracks.
Results
The Self-Adjusting File and Reciproc systems caused a higher rate of new microcrack
formation than the ProTaper Next group (p < 0.001). There were also significant
differences in the new microcrack formation between Reciproc and Self-Adjusting
File groups (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems caused a higher rate of newly formed
microcraks compared to ProTaper Next system.

References

  • Kansal R, Rajput A, Talwar S, Roongta R, Verma M. Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files. J Endod 2014;40(9):1443-6. [CrossRef ]
  • Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture. J Endod 1997;23(8):533-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2012;38(2):232-5. [CrossRef ]
  • Burklein S, Tsotsis P, Schafer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013;39(4):501-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD. The shaping movement: fifthgeneration technology. Dent Today 2013;32(4):94, 96-9.
  • Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The selfadjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy- -a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010;36(4):679-90. [CrossRef ]
  • Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R, Zary R, Paque F, Hulsmann M. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010;36(4):697-02. [CrossRef ]
  • De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Marins J, et al. Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root canal preparation with reciprocation systems. J Endod 2014;40(9):1447-50. [CrossRef ]
  • De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, et al. Micro-computed Tomographic Assessment on the Effect of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive Systems on Dentinal Cracks. J Endod 2015;41(7):1116-9. [CrossRef ]
  • Ceyhanli KT, Erdilek N, Tatar I, Celik D. Comparison of ProTaper, RaCe and Safesider instruments in the induction of dentinal microcracks: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J 2016;49(7):684-9. [CrossRef ]
  • Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, Shemesh H. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod 2013;39(8):1054-6. [CrossRef ]
  • Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Uysal B. Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin. J Endod 2014;40(9):1482-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Karatas E, Gunduz HA, Kirici DO, Arslan H, Topcu MC, Yeter KY. Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments. J Endod 2015;41(2):261-4. [CrossRef ]
  • Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, Velmurugan N. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. Int Endod J 2014;47(7):622-7. [CrossRef ]
  • Ustun Y, Aslan T, Sagsen B, Kesim B. The effects of different nickeltitanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation. Eur J Dent 2015;9(1):41-6. [CrossRef ]
  • Hin ES, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Shemesh H. Effects of selfadjusting file, Mtwo, and ProTaper on the root canal wall. J Endod 2013;39(2):262-4. [CrossRef ]
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Fatih Çakıcı This is me 0000-0002-8147-2661

Elif Bahar Çakıcı This is me 0000-0002-5769-0239

Burak Sadık This is me 0000-0003-2397-0926

Ali Keleş This is me 0000-0003-2835-767X

Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci This is me 0000-0002-9619-545X

Publication Date January 31, 2019
Submission Date May 17, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 53 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Çakıcı F, Çakıcı EB, Sadık B, Keleş A, Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci F (January 1, 2019) Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using Protaper Next, Reciproc and Self-Adjusting File systems. European Oral Research 53 1 21–24.