Maxillary tuberosity dimensions and tooth movement magnitude during distalisation using mini-implants: a preliminary tomographic study

Year 2025, Volume: 59 Issue: 3, 202 - 209, 08.10.2025

A. Sumathı Felicita , T.n. Uma Maheswari

https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251510919

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine whether changes in the dimensions of the maxillary tuberosity influence the distalisation of maxillary teeth using mini implants.

Materials and methods: Ten young orthodontic patients requiring mild to moderate proclination of the maxillary anterior teeth were studied. Distalisation of the maxillary teeth was achieved using a retractive force of 200 grams applied bilaterally to a 0.018"x0.022" stainless steel wire, with mini-implants located at the mucogingival junction. The dimensions of the maxillary tuberosity namely mesiodistal length, vertical height, and buccolingual width were measured using CBCT. The maxillary incisor proclination was measured on lateral cephalograms at T1 (before distalisation) and T2 (six months later). Statistical analysis included Spearman rank correlation analysis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: At T2, the mesiodistal length and the vertical height of the maxillary tuberosity showed a statistically significant decrease in dimension. The change in buccolingual width and the amount of anterior teeth retraction and distalisation of the first molar showed a statistically significant positive correlation suggesting that an increased remodelling of the maxillary tuberosity in the buccolingual dimension was associated with a greater magnitude of distalisation of the maxillary dentition. A positive correlation existed between the mesiodistal length at T1 and the amount of anterior retraction, suggesting that a greater mesiodistal length of the maxillary tuberosity at T1 corresponds to a greater amount of anterior retraction.

Conclusion: The dimensions of the maxillary tuberosity appear to influence the distalisation of the maxillary teeth with mini-implants.

Keywords

Maxillary tuberosity , dimension , anterior retraction , molar distalisation

References

• Lapenaite E, Lopatiene K. Interproximal enamel reduction as a part of orthodontic treatment. Stomatologija 2014; 16:19-24. google scholar
• Mateu ME, Bemtez-Roge S, Iglesias M, Calabrese D, Lumi M, Solla M, et al. Increased interpremolar development with self-ligating orthodontics. A prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2018; 31:104-9. google scholar
• Pindoria J, Fleming PS, Sharma PK. Inter-proximal enamel reduction in contemporary orthodontics. Br Dent J 2016; 221:757-63. google scholar
• Chua ES, Felicita AS. The orthodontic extraction of permanent molars: a literature review. Aust Orthod J 2015; 31:69-77. google scholar
• Kim M, Kim M, Chun Y-S. Molar uprighting by a nickel-titanium spring based on a setup model. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2014; 146:119-23. google scholar
• Bechtold TE, Kim JW, Choi TH, Park YC, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of the maxillary arch depending on the number of orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2013; 83:266-73. google scholar
• Yamada K, Kuroda S, Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T. Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region. Angle Orthod 2009; 79:78-84. google scholar
• Felicita AS, Thomas LA. Overall treatment outcome achieved during distal movement of the entire maxillary dentition using mini-implants-A single-center analytical observational clinical study. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia Medicina Dentaria e Cirurgia Maxilofacial 2022; 63:3-11. google scholar
• Manzanera E, Llorca P, Manzanera D, Garda-Sanz V, Sada V, Paredes-Gallardo V. Anatomical study of the maxillary tuberosity using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiology 2018; 34:56-65. google scholar
• Koffi JN, Koffi SG, Assi DK. Maxillary tuberosities size and shape in African Blacks total edentulous. Odontostomatol Trop 2004; 27:11-4. google scholar
• Fuhrmann RA, Wehrbein H, Langen HJ, Diedrich PR. Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24:50-4. google scholar
• Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6: 95-101. google scholar
• Lagravere MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2008; 134:112-6. google scholar
• Yamada K, Kuroda S, Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T. Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region. Angle Orthod 2009; 79:78-84. google scholar
• Felicita AS. A simple three-dimensional stent for proper placement of mini-implant. Prog Orthod 2013; 14:45. google scholar
• Omar Z, Short L, Banting DW, Saltaji H. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction. Int Orthod 2018; 16:91-104. google scholar
• Kouvelis G, Dritsas K, Doulis I, Kloukos D, Gkantidis N. Effect of orthodontic treatment with 4 premolar extractions compared with nonextraction treatment on the vertical dimension of the face: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154:175-87. google scholar
• Kahl-Nieke B. The role of extraction in stability of orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop 1996; 57:272-87. google scholar
• Richardson ME, Burden DJ. Second molar extraction in the treatment of lower premolar crowding. Br J Orthod 1992; 19:299-304. google scholar
• Miyake H, Ryu T, Himuro T. Effects on the dental arch form using a preadjusted appliance with premolar extraction in Class I crowding. Angle Orthod 2008; 78:1043-9. google scholar
• Al Kuwari HM, Talakey AA, Al-Sahli RM, Albadr AH. Influence of orthodontic treatment with first premolar extraction on the angulation of the mandibular third molar. Saudi Med J 2013; 34:639-43. google scholar
• Miclotte A, Van Hevele J, Roels A, Elaut J, Willems G, Politis C, et al. Position of lower wisdom teeth and their relation to the alveolar nerve in orthodontic patients treated with and without extraction of premolars: a longitudinal study. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18:1731-9. google scholar
• Haque S, Sandler J, Cobourne MT, Bassett P, DiBiase AT. A retrospective study comparing the loss of anchorage following the extraction of maxillary first or second premolars during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescent patients. J Orthod 2017; 44:268-76. google scholar
• Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Işiksal E. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:775-84. google scholar
• Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2011; 139:495-503. google scholar
• Cohen L. Fractures of the maxillary tuberosity occurring during tooth extraction. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1960; 13:409-11. google scholar
• Shah N, Bridgman J. An extraction complicated by lateral and medial pterygoid tethering of a fractured maxillary tuberosity. British Dental Journal 2005; 198:543-4. google scholar
• Chrcanovic BR, Freire-Maia B. Considerations of maxillary tuberosity fractures during extraction of upper molars: a literatüre review. Dent Traumatol 2011; 27:393-8. google scholar
• Vieira BD, Farias LST, Cruz MMS, Brasileiro BF. Risk factors associated to maxillary tuberosity fracture during upper third molar extraction. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2019; 48:61. google scholar
• Felicita AS, Thomas LA, Uma Maheswari TN. Influence of the maxillary third molars and the surrounding cortical plate during maxillary tooth movement with TADS- A CBCT Study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024; 28:1169-79. google scholar
• Nascimento MDCC, Boscolo SMA, Haiter-Neto F, Santos ECD, Lambrichts I, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Influence of basis images and skull position on evaluation of cortical bone thickness in cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123:707-13. google scholar