Research Article

The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development

Volume: 9 Number: 2 June 30, 2024
TR EN

The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development

Abstract

The source of economic growth is the supply-demand balance. Demand refers to consumption and supply refers to production. Producing quality products plays an important role on the production side of this balance. The country, which has a wide range of qualified products called sophisticated products, continues to grow with financial development. The concept of economic complexity refers to product diversity. This concept has taken its place in the literature by being expanded into commercial, technological, and research complexity indices as the content of the multidimensional complexity index. In this study, the relationship between multidimensional complexity indices and financial development indicators of E7 (Emerging) countries (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, Turkey) is analyzed with Gengenbach, Urbain, and Westerlund Cointegration Test and Mean Group Estimator applied in case of cointegration. It has been determined that these variables are cointegrated, and this relationship between the commercial and technological complexity index and financial development is significant. As a result of the analysis with the mean group estimator, it was concluded that the technological complexity index has a greater impact on financial development than the commercial and research complexity indices.

Keywords

References

  1. Can, M. and Dogan, B. (2018). The relationship between economic complexity and financial development: An empirical analysis in the Turkish sample. Finance, Political and Economic Comments, 638, 5-16. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fpeyd/
  2. Daude, C., Nagengas, A. and Perea, J.R. (2015). Productive capabilities: An empirical analysis of their drives. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(4), 504-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1073342
  3. Efeoglu, R. (2022). Economic complexity and financial development in N11 countries. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1016597
  4. Erkan, B. and Yildirimci, E. (2015). Economic complexity and export competitiveness: The case of Türkiye. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.262
  5. Gengenbach, C., Urbain, J-P. and Westerlund, J. (2016). Error correction testing in panels with common stochastic trends. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31(6), 982-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2475
  6. Hausmann, R. and Hidalgo, C.A. (2010). Country diversification, product ubiquity, and economic divergence (Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper No. 201). Retrieved from https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4554740/RWP10-045_Hausmann_Hidalgo.pdf
  7. Hausmann, R. and Hidalgo, C.A. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4), 309-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9071-4 International Monetary Fund. (2024). Financial development [Dataset]. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Data
  8. Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J.A., Koengkan, M. and Shadmehri, M.T.A. (2023). Relationship between the share of renewable electricity consumption, economic complexity, financial development and oil prices: A two-step club convergence and PVAR model approach. International Economics, 173, 260-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2022.12.001

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Panel Data Analysis, Macroeconomic Theory

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2024

Submission Date

January 30, 2024

Acceptance Date

June 28, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 9 Number: 2

APA
Baskak, T. E. (2024). The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development. Ekonomi Politika Ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 306-322. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1428412
AMA
1.Baskak TE. The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development. EPF Journal. 2024;9(2):306-322. doi:10.30784/epfad.1428412
Chicago
Baskak, Tuba Esra. 2024. “The Relationship Between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development”. Ekonomi Politika Ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi 9 (2): 306-22. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1428412.
EndNote
Baskak TE (June 1, 2024) The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi 9 2 306–322.
IEEE
[1]T. E. Baskak, “The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development”, EPF Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 306–322, June 2024, doi: 10.30784/epfad.1428412.
ISNAD
Baskak, Tuba Esra. “The Relationship Between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development”. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi 9/2 (June 1, 2024): 306-322. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1428412.
JAMA
1.Baskak TE. The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development. EPF Journal. 2024;9:306–322.
MLA
Baskak, Tuba Esra. “The Relationship Between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development”. Ekonomi Politika Ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 2, June 2024, pp. 306-22, doi:10.30784/epfad.1428412.
Vancouver
1.Tuba Esra Baskak. The Relationship between Commercial, Technological, Research (Multidimensional) Complexity Indices and Financial Development. EPF Journal. 2024 Jun. 1;9(2):306-22. doi:10.30784/epfad.1428412