Conference Paper

Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens

Volume: 16 December 31, 2021
  • M. Emin Tamer
  • Almila Gulfem Ozgultekın
  • Beyzanur Aydın
EN

Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens

Abstract

The demand for lightweight products to reduce CO2 emissions and high safety requirements is an increasing trend, especially in the vehicle and electrical appliance industry. The use of high-strength steels instead of conventional mild steels by using predictive modeling methods in finite element analysis plays a major role. Moreover, physical full-scale crash tests are time-consuming as well as expensive. Crash tolerance analysis in the finite element environment depends on the accuracy of the damage and the definition of the material model parameters. This study examines the damage model GISSMO-Generalized Increasing Stress State-induced damage model and the onset of fracture was calculated by sample optimization via finite element analysis in this study. This research presents the modeling of a specific region of the material fracture curve using the different geometric samples. The results of the numerical simulations are validated by comparing the experimental data of the optimized test samples with their measurements.

Keywords

References

  1. Bao, Y., & Wierzbicki, T. (2004). On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 46(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006
  2. Driemeier, L., Brünig, M., Micheli, G., & Alves, M. (2010). Experiments on stress-triaxiality dependence of material behavior of aluminum alloys. Mechanics of Materials, 42(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.11.012
  3. Gholami, T., Lescheticky, J., & Paßmann, R. (2003, June). Crashworthiness simulation of automobiles with ABAQUS/Explicit. In Journal of Abaqus User Conference. BMW Group.
  4. Hochholdinger, B., Grass, H., Lipp, A., Hora, P., & BMW AG, M. (2009). Determination of flow curves by stack compression tests and inverse analysis for the simulation of hot forming. 7th European LS-DYNA conference.
  5. Hörling, D. (2015). Parameter identification of GISSMO damage model for DOCOL 1200m: A study on crash simulation for high strength steel sheet components. DIVA. http://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A845116&dswid=-9443.
  6. Liu, W., Lian, J., & Münstermann, S. (2019). Damage mechanism analysis of a high-strength dual-phase steel sheet with optimized fracture samples for various stress states and loading rates. Engineering Failure Analysis, 106, 104–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.08.004
  7. Merklein, M., & Kuppert, A. (2009). A method for the layer compression test considering the anisotropic material behavior. International Journal of Material Forming, 2(1), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0592-8
  8. Mohr, D., & Doyoyo, M. (2004). Experimental investigation on the plasticity of hexagonal aluminum honeycomb under multiaxial loading. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 71(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1683715

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Authors

M. Emin Tamer This is me
Türkiye

Almila Gulfem Ozgultekın This is me
Türkiye

Beyzanur Aydın This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 31, 2021

Submission Date

August 10, 2021

Acceptance Date

October 1, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 16

APA
Tamer, M. E., Ozgultekın, A. G., & Aydın, B. (2021). Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 16, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1052213
AMA
1.Tamer ME, Ozgultekın AG, Aydın B. Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens. EPSTEM. 2021;16:31-38. doi:10.55549/epstem.1052213
Chicago
Tamer, M. Emin, Almila Gulfem Ozgultekın, and Beyzanur Aydın. 2021. “Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens”. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics 16 (December): 31-38. https://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1052213.
EndNote
Tamer ME, Ozgultekın AG, Aydın B (December 1, 2021) Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics 16 31–38.
IEEE
[1]M. E. Tamer, A. G. Ozgultekın, and B. Aydın, “Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens”, EPSTEM, vol. 16, pp. 31–38, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.55549/epstem.1052213.
ISNAD
Tamer, M. Emin - Ozgultekın, Almila Gulfem - Aydın, Beyzanur. “Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens”. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics 16 (December 1, 2021): 31-38. https://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1052213.
JAMA
1.Tamer ME, Ozgultekın AG, Aydın B. Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens. EPSTEM. 2021;16:31–38.
MLA
Tamer, M. Emin, et al. “Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens”. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, vol. 16, Dec. 2021, pp. 31-38, doi:10.55549/epstem.1052213.
Vancouver
1.M. Emin Tamer, Almila Gulfem Ozgultekın, Beyzanur Aydın. Gissmo Failure Modelling for Crashworthiness Analysis Using Different Test Specimens. EPSTEM. 2021 Dec. 1;16:31-8. doi:10.55549/epstem.1052213