The experimental studies on fracture mechanics of concrete until the 1970s revealed that classicallinear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) was invalid for cementitious materials such as mortar and concrete. This inapplicability of LEFM is due to the existence of an inelastic zone with large-scale and full cracks in front of the
crack tip in concrete. This so-called fracture process zone is ignored by LEFM. For this reason, severalinvestigators have developed nonlinear fracture mechanics approaches to characterize failure of concretestructures. According to the two-parameter model (TPM) in concrete fracture, a free crack propagates unstably
whenever the stress intensity factor and the crack tip opening displacement are equal to their threshold values,such as Mode I fracture toughness and critical crack tip opening displacement, respectively. This methodology derives fracture parameters from one of two experimental techniques: the compliance method and the peak load method. In the compliance method, fracture parameters are ascertained from the correlation between the load andthe crack mouth opening displacement of beams, utilizing closed-loop testing apparatus, while the peak-loadmethod, which does not necessitate complex testing apparatus, is more straightforward than the compliancemethod for determining fracture parameters within TPM. In this study, a modified peak load method based on an optimization procedure was proposed to determine fracture parameters of TPM instead of the statistical procedurebased on the peak load method.
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Classical Physics (Other) |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | July 8, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | August 12, 2025 |
| Early Pub Date | November 4, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 36 |