Research Article

QUANTITATIVE PHASE ANALYSIS OF ARMOUR STEEL WELDED JOINT BY X-RAY DIFFRACTION

Number: 1 November 9, 2017
  • Miroslav Cvetinov
  • Aleksandar čabrilo
  • Katarina Gerić
  • Maja Stojanović
  • Olivera Klisurić
EN

QUANTITATIVE PHASE ANALYSIS OF ARMOUR STEEL WELDED JOINT BY X-RAY DIFFRACTION

Abstract

Ultra-high tensile strength is characteristic of armour steel and in order to preserve this strength its welding process is of paramount importance. Austenitic filler material is traditionally used for welding of armour steel, yet it has lower mechanical properties than the base material, i.e. the filler material is the weakest point of the welded joint. Moreover, due to the plastic deformation at the crack tip austenitic filler material gets transformed into martensite during fatigue crack propagation. An amount of austenite transformed into martensite is directly related to crack growth resistance in the weld metal.

 

In order to quantify martensite phase formed during the crack propagation under the effect of fatigue load, we employed method of X-ray diffraction. Diffractograms were recorded in Brag–Brentano θ:2θ reflection geometry on a Philips PW 1820/30 X-ray diffractometer employing monochromatic CuKα radiation (30 kV, 30 mA) in the range 40°-60° 2θ. For the quantitative phase analysis RIR method was subsequently employed.

From the obtained data, martensite to austenite ratio was calculated for the fracture surface. Thereafter the 0.05 mm thick layer was removed from specimen surface and the diffraction patern was recorded again. This procedure was repeated till 25% of the martensite remained in two-phase mixture.

 

α´ martensite was detected at distances up to 0.25 mm under the fracture surface. The greatest transformation of austenite into α´ martensite was 55%, seen on the fracture surface. The amount of α´ martensite declines with a distance by an average of ≈5%/0.05 mm, in the depth perception tests. At the distance of 0.25 mm, the amount of transformed austenite fell to 24%. 

Keywords

References

  1. Alkemade S.J., (1996). The Weld Cracking Susceptibility of High Hardness Armour Steel. Australia. Amar K.D., David C., Murdock C.M., Speer J.G., & Matlock K.D. (2004). Quantitative measurement of deformation-induced martensite in 304 stainless steel by X-ray diffraction. Scripta Materialia. 50, 1445-1449. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 03.01. (2004). ASTM E647-08: Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. West Conshohocken, PA: ASM International. Atabaki M.M., Ma J., Yang G., & Kovacevic R. (2014). Hybrid laser/arc welding of advanced high strength steel in different butt joint configurations. Materials and Design. 64, 573–587. Arbuzov M., Golub S.Y., & Karpets M. (1986). Structure of austenite ordering in chromium steels. Fizika Metallov i Metallovedenie. 62, 108-111. Cabrilo A., & Geric K. (2016). Weldability of High hardness armour steel. Advanced Materials Research. 1138, 79-84. Grujicic M., Lai S.G., & Gumbsch P. (1997), Atomistic simulation study of the effect of martensitic transformation volume change on crack-tip material evolution and fracture toughness. Materials Science and Engineering A. 231, 151–162. Haušild P., Davydov V., Drahokoupil J., Landa M., & Pilvin P. (2010). Characterization of strain-induced martensitic transformation in a metastable austenitic stainless steel. Materials and Design. 31, 1821–1827. Magudeeswaran G., Balasubramanian V., & Madhusudhan R.G. (2008). Effect of welding processes and consumables on high cycle fatigue life of high strength, quenched and tempered joints. Materials and Design. 29, 1821-1827. Martelo D.F., Mateo A., & Chapetti M. D. (2015). Crack closure and fatigue crack growth near threshold of a metastable austenitic stainless steel, International Journal of Fatigue. 77, 64–77. Mei Z., & Morris J.W. (1990). Influence of deformation-induced martensite on fatigue crack propagation in 304-type steels. Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A. 12(21), 3137–52. Nakajima M., Akita M., Uematsuc Y., & Tokaji K. (2010). Effect of strain-induced martensitic transformation on fatigue behavior of type 304 stainless steel. Procedia Engineering. 2, 323–330. Shah Khan M.Z., Alkemade S.J., Weston G.M., & Wiese D.G. (1998). Variable-amplitude fatigue testing of a high hardness armour steel. International Journal of Fatigue. 3(20), 233-239. Snyder R.L. (1992). The Use of Reference Intensity Ratios in X-Ray Quantitative Analysis. Powder Diffraction. 7, 186-193.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Miroslav Cvetinov This is me

Aleksandar čabrilo This is me

Katarina Gerić This is me

Maja Stojanović This is me

Olivera Klisurić This is me

Publication Date

November 9, 2017

Submission Date

November 10, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Number: 1

APA
Cvetinov, M., čabrilo, A., Gerić, K., Stojanović, M., & Klisurić, O. (2017). QUANTITATIVE PHASE ANALYSIS OF ARMOUR STEEL WELDED JOINT BY X-RAY DIFFRACTION. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 1, 36-40. https://izlik.org/JA58JN87XY