Research Article

WATER QUALITY LIMITATION FOR TURBIDITY BASED SEDIMENT MEASUREMENT IN RIVERS

Number: 1 November 9, 2017
  • Ramazan Meral
  • Sebahattin Kaya
  • Azize Dogan Demir
  • Yasin Demir
EN

WATER QUALITY LIMITATION FOR TURBIDITY BASED SEDIMENT MEASUREMENT IN RIVERS

Abstract

The concentration and size of sediment particles are mainly affected flow and climate conditions, soil properties, topography, and plant cover properties. The direct water sampling method has many difficulties to represent continuous monitoring of sediment transport, especially during extreme flow conditions Turbidity based estimating of suspended sediment is widely used for river studies due to its simply and cheap using. The strong relationship between turbidity and suspended sediment concentrations has led to the use of turbidimetry to estimate sediment concentration. The use of turbidity values for SSC is an indirect method and based on to determine the statistical relationship between these values; the relationship could be linear, non-linear or polynomial. But this relation is affected by water pollution, colloids and plankton units, air bubbles and other suspended materials in the water sample rather than mineral suspended particles. In this study, Seapoint Turbidity Meter sensor was used to provide accurate, reliable, automated and continuous time series of suspended-sediment concentrations under different water quality conditions in river. The study was conducted at river conditions, and two different water qualities were considered depend on electrical conductivity and turbidity values. The first sampling point was chosen close the source of river for obtaining clear water and second one was chosen at polluted point by waste water of city. The regression analyses were applied between the sediment concentrations with the turbidity values to observe of different water quality effects and were evaluated using determination coefficient (R2) and regression equation. Sediment concentration values were varied between 0.02 and 1.12 g/l during sampling season depend on rainfall and river discharge but these values and water quality parameters were found extremely high and unstable due to pollution of waste water pollution of city.  Fairly high R2 value (0.971) was obtained for first station water which has relatively clear, but week relationship (0.273) was obtained of between the sediment concentrations and the turbidity values for second station due to water pollution. This problem is important limitation for turbidity based sediment measurement, and it should be considered to more accurately estimate sediment concentration with turbidity values

Keywords

References

  1. APHA, (2012). Standard method 2130. Turbidity. In: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. - 22nd edition. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC. Chanson, H., Takeuchi, M., Trevethan, M. (2008). Using turbidity and acoustic backscatter intensity as surrogate measures of suspended sediment concentration in a small subtropical estuary. Journal of environmental management, 88, 1406-1416. Gray, J.R., Glysson, G.D., Mueller, D.S. (2002). Comparability and accuracy of fluvial-sediment data-a view from the US Geological Survey. - Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Hydraulics Measurements & Experimental Methods Symposium, Estes Park, CO, July 28 –August 1. Guerrero, M., Rüther, N., Szupiany, R., Haun, S., Baranya, S., Latosinski, F. (2016). The Acoustic properties of suspended sediment in large rivers, Consequences on ADCP methods applicability. Water 8, 13. Lewis, J., & Eads, R, (2001). Turbidity threshold sampling for suspended sediment load estimation. - In: Proceedings, 7th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference 25–29 March 2001, Reno, NV, USA, pp. 110–117. Melesse, A.M., Ahmad, S., McClain, M.E., Wang, X., Lim, Y.H. (2011). Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems, An artificial neural network approach. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 855-866. Mitchell, S.B., Lawler, D.M., West, J.R., Couperthwaite, J.S. (2003). Use of continuous turbidity sensor in the prediction of fine sediment transport in the turbidity maximum of the trent Estuary UK.- Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 58, 645–652. Pedocchi, F., & Garcia, M.H. (2012). Acoustic measurement of suspended sediment concentration profiles in an oscillatory boundary layer. Continental Shelf Research, 46, 87-95. Schoellhamer, D.H., & Wright, S.A. (2003). Continuous monitoring of suspended sediment discharge in rivers by use of optical backscatterance sensors. - In: Bogen, J., Fergus, T., and Walling, D.E., Eds., Erosion and Sediment Transport Measurement: Technological and Methodological Advances, Int. Assoc. Hydro Sci Pub 283, 28-36. Slaets, J.I, Schmitter, P., Hilger, T., Lamers, M., Piepho, H.P., Vien, T.D.A. (2014). Turbidity-based method to continuously monitor sediment, carbon and nitrogen flows inmountainous watersheds. Journal of hydrology,513, 45-57. Smerdon, A.M (2006). AQUAscat; ABS system user manual. - Aquatec Electronics Limited, Hartley Wintney. Sun, H., Cornish, P.S, Daniell, T.M (2001). Turbidity based erosion estimation in catchment in South Australia. Journal of hydrology, 253, 227-238. Tananaev, N.I, & Debolskiy, M.V. (2014). Turbidity observations in sediment flux studies: Examples from Russian rivers in cold environments. Geomorphology, 218, 63-71. Tfwala, S.S., & Wang, Y.M. (2016). Estimating Sediment Discharge Using Sediment Rating Curves and Artificial Neural Networks in the Shiwen River Taiwan. Water 8, 53. Thorne, P.D., Hanes, D.M. (2002). A review of acoustic measurement of small-scale sediment processes. Continental shelf research, 22, 603-632. Uncles, R.J., & Stephens, J.A. (2010). Turbidity and sediment transport in a muddy sub-estuary: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 87, 213-224. Williamson, T.N. & Crawford, C.G (2011). Estimation of Suspended-Sediment Concentration from Total Suspended Solids and Turbidity Data for Kentucky, 1978-1995. - JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47, 739-749. Wren, D.G., Barkdoll, B.D., Kuhnle, R.A., Derrow, R.W. (2000). Field techniques for suspended sediment measurement. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 126, 97-104. Yao, M., Nan, J., Chen, T. (2014). Effect of particle size distribution on turbidity under various water quality levels during flocculation processes. Desalination, 354, 116-124. Ziegler, C.A. (2002). Issues related to use of turbidity measurements surrogate for suspended sediment. - Turbidity and Other Sediment Surrogates Workshop, April 30 – May 2 2002, Reno, NV.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ramazan Meral This is me

Sebahattin Kaya This is me

Azize Dogan Demir This is me

Yasin Demir This is me

Publication Date

November 9, 2017

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Number: 1

APA
Meral, R., Kaya, S., Dogan Demir, A., & Demir, Y. (2017). WATER QUALITY LIMITATION FOR TURBIDITY BASED SEDIMENT MEASUREMENT IN RIVERS. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 1, 383-387. https://izlik.org/JA23KW76MG