Research Article

A Comparison of the Performance of Classification Methods and Artificial Neural Networks for Electricity Load Forecasting

Number: 2 August 19, 2018
  • Gurkan Tuna
  • Ahmet Vatansever
  • Resul Das
EN

A Comparison of the Performance of Classification Methods and Artificial Neural Networks for Electricity Load Forecasting

Abstract

Electricity load forecasting plays a key role for utility companies. Short-term and medium-term electricity load forecasting processes allow the utility companies to retain reliable operation and high energy efficiency. On the other hand, long-term electricity load forecasting allows the utility companies to minimize the risks. Long-term forecasting also helps the utility companies to plan and make feasible decisions in regard to generation and transmission investments. Since there are commercial and technical implications of electricity load forecasting, the accuracy of the electricity forecasting is important not only to the utility companies but also to the consumers. In this paper, we carry out a performance evaluation study to evaluate the accuracy of different classification approaches for electricity load forecasting. As shown with the results of the performance evaluation study, some of the investigated approaches can successfully achieve high accuracy rates and therefore can be used for short-, mid-, or long-term electricity load forecasting. 

Keywords

References

  1. Almeshaiei, E., & Soltan, H. (2011). A methodology for Electric Power Load Forecasting. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 50(2), 137-144. Guerard, J. B., & Schwartz, E. (2010). Quantitative corporate finance. New York: Springer. Hastie, T. J., Tibshirani, R. J., & Friedman, J. H. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer New York Inc., USA. Hernandez, L., Baladron, C., Aguiar, J. M., Carro, B., Sanchez-Esguevillas, A. J., Lloret, J., & Massana, J. (2014). A survey on electric power demand forecasting: Future trends in smart grids, microgrids and smart buildings. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1460-1495. Popescu, M. –C., Balas, V. E., Perescu-Popescu, L., & Mastorakis, N. (2009). Multilayer perceptron and neural networks. WSEAS Trans. Cir. and Sys., 8(7), 579-588. Reynaldi, A., Lukas, S., & Margaretha, H. (2012). Backpropagation and Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm for Training Finite Element Neural Network. Proceedings of the 2012 Sixth UKSim/AMSS European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation (EMS '12) (pp. 89-94). Steinwart, I. (2014). Support vector machines. Springer. Suganthi, L., & Samuel, A. A. (2012). Energy models for demand forecasting—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(2), 1223-1240. Weron, R. (2006). Modeling and forecasting electricity loads and prices. Chichester: Wiley & Sons. Yan, X., & Su, X. G. (2009). Linear regression analysis theory and computing. Singapore: World Scientific. https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/ https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gurkan Tuna This is me

Ahmet Vatansever This is me

Resul Das This is me

Publication Date

August 19, 2018

Submission Date

May 8, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Number: 2

APA
Tuna, G., Vatansever, A., & Das, R. (2018). A Comparison of the Performance of Classification Methods and Artificial Neural Networks for Electricity Load Forecasting. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 2, 233-238. https://izlik.org/JA83DH68UC