Review
BibTex RIS Cite

From an Activist Movement to a Global Actor: How Effective Is Greenpeace in Global Environmental Governance?

Year 2026, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 82 - 104, 26.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.48064/equinox.1887954
https://izlik.org/JA89HS82YL

Abstract

Environmental problems ve related solutions are at the center of these global debates. Although Greenpeace emerged as a small protest group, today it is one of the most organized ve global actors. Greenpeace is an influential actor in the environmental policies of states, private companies ve traditional supranational institutions. On the one hve, it plays an active role in international conventions on environmental issues, ve on the other hve, it plays a supervisory role in the implementation of these laws ve policies. In addition, it is involved in the development of environmental awareness ve awareness-raising activities against environmental problems. Unlike traditional supranational institutions, Greenpeace is financially independent ve its organization is based on non-state members, i.e. civilian participants. This study examines Greenpeace, which has evolved globally ve differently from traditional supranational actors. Greenpeace's interaction with states, private companies ve supranational institutions ve its role in environmental policies are analyzed. Although the importance of nation states continues, the sovereignty of states is being undermined, as in the case of Greenpeace. It is seen that organizations such as Greenpeace are effective on issues such as environmental problems

Ethical Statement

This study has been prepared in accordance with the principles of scientific research and publication ethics. At all stages of the study, honesty, transparency, and academic ethical standards have been strictly observed.

Thanks

I would like to thank the journal editors and reviewers for their valuable contributions to this publication.

References

  • Akbal, İ. ve Çalı, H. (2008). Çevreci sivil toplum örgütlerinde sivil itaatsizlik uygulamaları ve Greenpeace Türkiye örneği. Akdemir, A. (Ed.). V. Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Kongresi: Küresel Barış içinde (s. 399-408). Çanakkale: Aynalı Gazetecilik ve Matbaacılık.
  • Alphan, M. (2012, 6 Aralık). Keşke iş Zara’yla bitse. Hürriyet. Erişim adresi: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/melis-alphan/keske-is-zara-yla-bitse-22086620
  • Arslan, H. (2011). Bir doğrudan eylem hareketi olarak Greenpeace (Yeşil Barış). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, 247-258.
  • Bernhardt, C. (2017). Governance, statehood, ve space in 20th century political struggles: An introduction. Historical Social Research, 42(2), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.42.2017.2.199-217
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  • Cicioğlu, F. ve Bostancı, B. (2017). Uluslararası sistemde hükümet-dışı örgütlenmeler: Greenpeace örneği. PESA Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 71-82.
  • Doruk, E. (2021). Antarktika antlaşmalar sistemi kapsamında çevre örgütlerinin rolü: Antarktika ve Güney Okyanusu Koalisyonu örneği. International Journal of Politics ve Security, 3, 369-389. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.866970
  • Downie, C. (2014). Transnational actors in environmental politics: Strategies ve influence in long negotiations. Environmental Politics, 23(3), 376-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.875252
  • European Commission. (2022). Protecting journalists ve human rights defenders from strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-ve-policy/policies/justice-ve-fundamental-rights/democracy-eu-citizenship-anti-corruption/democracy-ve-electoral-rights/protecting-journalists-ve-human-rights-defenders-strategic-lawsuits-against-public-participation_en
  • European Parliament. (2023a). COP28 climate talks agree on transitioning away from fossil fuels. European Parliament News. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231205IPR15686/cop28-climate-talks-agree-on-transitioning-away-from-fossil-fuels
  • European Parliament. (2023b). Written question E-003706/2023 on environmental regulations for private jets. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-003706_EN.html
  • Gonzaga, D. (2023, 28 Nisan). Victory! After Greenpeace report, Hyundai construction equipment commits to help stopping illegal mining in the Amazon. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/59521/victory-after-greenpeace-report-hyundai-construction-equipment-commits-to-help-stopping-illegal-mining-in-the-amazon/
  • Greenpeace Akdeniz. (2022a). Küresel Plastik Anlaşması: plastik kirliliğini sona erdirmek için büyük, cesur adım. Greenpeace dergisi, S. 172. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-turkey-stateless/2022/06/7d7a5444-gp172_dijital_mart2022.pdf
  • Greenpeace Akdeniz. (2022b). 2022’de birlikte neler başardık. Greenpeace Akdeniz Dergisi, S. 181. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-turkey-stateless/2023/02/2050c883-gp_181.pdf
  • Greenpeace Akdeniz. (2025). Başarılar. https://www.greenpeace.org/turkey/greenpeace-turkiyenin-elde-ettigi-basarilar/
  • Greenpeace Belçika. (2022). Rechtszaak tegen miljardeninvestering van INEOS in plasticfabriek Antwerpen. https://www.greenpeace.org/belgium/nl/persbericht/28119/rechtszaak-tegen-miljardeninvestering-van-ineos-in-plasticfabriek-antwerpen/
  • Greenpeace International. (2023). UN Ocean Treaty formally adopted, as the race to ratification begins. Greenpeace International. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/60330/un-ocean-treaty-formally-adopted-race-ratification-begins/
  • Greenpeace International. (2024). ITLOS sets groundbreaking victory for ocean ve climate protection. Greenpeace International. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/67125/itlos-sets-groundbreaking-victory-for-ocean-ve-climate-protection/
  • Greenpeace Türkiye. (2024, 2 Aralık). Norveç’te derin deniz madenciliği planları durduruldu. Greenpeace Türkiye Blog. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/turkey/blog/norvecte-derin-deniz-madenciligi-planlari-durduruldu/
  • Greenpeace. (2024). Who is Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/GP-11-14-Intro-Final.pdf
  • Greenpeace. (2025). Stopping offshore drilling. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/protect-the-arctic/stopping-offshore-drilling/
  • Haber Ekonomi. (2014, 9 Ekim). LEGO, Shell ile 50 yıllık işbirliğini sonlveırma kararı verdi. Erişim adresi: https://www.haberekonomi.com.tr/index.asp?sayfa=haber&icerik=3681
  • Hale, T. (2020). Transnational actors ve transnational governance in global environmental politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 203-220.
  • Hansen, P. K. ve Lundholt, M. W. (2021). I thought Shell was the bad guy: Narrative ve fictionality in Greenpeace's campaign against the LEGO-Shell partnership. Narrative, 29(1), 29-46.
  • Hanson, J. (2023, 19 Haziran). How we got a global ocean treaty – ve what comes next. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/60272/how-we-got-global-ocean-treaty-what-comes-next/
  • Hipp, R. (2023, 15 Nisan). Tschüss, Atomkraft: The end of nuclear power in Germany. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/59219/tschuss-atomkraft-end-nuclear-power-germany/
  • Karagöz, K. (2013). Yeni medya çağında dönüşen toplumsal hareketler ve dijital aktivizm hareketleri. İletişim ve Diplomasi, 1, 131-156.
  • Kolombo, L. (2022, 16 Ağustos). How we’re fighting the oil industry in the Argentine Sea. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/55252/fighting-oil-industry-argentinesea
  • Leman, M. (2025, 6 Mart). Battling the giants: How Greenpeace fights back against SLAPP lawsuits. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/69821/battling-the-giants-how-greenpeace-fights-back-against-slapp-lawsuits/
  • Moloney, K. ve Legrve, T. (2024). Actors, alterations, ve authorities: Three observations of global policy ve its transnational administration. Policy ve Society, 43(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae003 NTV Haber. (2010, 20 Mayıs). Orangutanlar kurtuldu mu? Erişim adresi: https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/orangutanlar-kurtuldu-mu,AjCIFzgg40ClKI3GqB3rnQ
  • Okumu, S., Fournier, L., Alejvera, M. ve Barney, S. (2024, 4 Haziran). Can an ocean court victory power the climate justice movement? Yes, ve here’s why. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/67499/ocean-court-itlos-climate-justice-advisory-opinion-legal-ruling-explained/
  • Onur, G. ve Kocabay, Ş. N. (2024). Çevre ve ekoloji örgütlerinin iletişim perspektiflerine sosyal medya aracılığıyla bakmak: Kuzey Ormanları Savunması ve Greenpeace International örneği. Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 60-83. https://doi.org/10.61766/hire.1493687
  • Price, C. (2023). Greenpeace ve the online genetically modified food debate in the UK: The role of science ve scientific evidence in environmental representation. Public Understveing of Science, 32(4), 489-503.
  • Saatçioğlu, E. (2017). Sivil toplum örgütlerinin sosyal medya kullanımları: Greenpeace Türkiye Facebook sayfası örneği. Selçuk İletişim, 10(1), 158-187. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.330941
  • Sevinç, G. (2023). COP15: Yerli halkların tanınması için büyük kazanım ama biyoçeşitliliğin korunması için daha fazlası gerekiyor. https://www.greenpeace.org/turkey/blog/cop15-yerli-halklarin-taninmasi-icin-buyuk-kazanim-ama-biyocesitliligin-korunmasi-icin-daha-fazlasi-gerekiyor/
  • Strømsnes, K., Selle, P. ve Grendstad, G. (2009). Environmentalism between state ve local community: Why Greenpeace has failed in Norway. Environmental Politics, 18(3), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010902823774
  • United Nations General Assembly. (2023). Resolution 77/276: Request for an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the obligations of states in respect of climate change. International Court of Justice press office & United Nations. https://www.icj-cij.org/node/202671
  • United Nations. (2023b). COP28 ends with call to ‘transition away’ from fossil fuels; UN Chief says phaseout is inevitable. United Nations. https://unsdg.un.org/latest/stories/cop28-ends-call-%E2%80%98transition-away%E2%80%99-fossil-fuels-un-chief-says-phaseout-inevitable
  • Wagner, C., Cresta, F. ve Kuen, T. L. (2024, 19 Aralık). Hope is created through action: Climate ve environmental victories of 2024. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/71853/hope-is-created-through-action-climate-environmental-victories-of-2024/
  • Yalçın, A. (2024). Küresel kuruluşların eğitim ve kültürel konularla ilgili faaliyetleri. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1428728
  • Yıldız, E. (2018). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarının yaptıkları kampanyaların kurum politikalarına etkisi. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, 16, 354-367.
  • Zelko, F. (2017). Scaling Greenpeace: From local activism to global governance. Historical Social Research, 42(2), 318-342. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.42.2017.2.318-342

Aktivist Bir Hareketten Küresel Bir Aktöre: Greenpeace Küresel Çevre Yönetişiminde Ne Kadar Etkilidir?

Year 2026, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 82 - 104, 26.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.48064/equinox.1887954
https://izlik.org/JA89HS82YL

Abstract

Çevre sorunları ve buna ilişkin çözüm önerileri küresel tartışmaların merkezinde yer almaktadır. Greenpeace her ne kadar küçük bir protesto grubu olarak ortaya çıkmışsa da günümüzde en organize olmuş ve küresel bir aktör olarak yerini korumaktadır. Greenpeace devletler, özel şirketler ve geleneksel ulus üstü kurumların çevre politikasında etkili olan bir aktördür. Bir taraftan çevre konularında çıkartılan uluslararası sözleşmelerde etkin rol oynamakta diğer taraftan bu yasa ve politikaların uygulanması aşamasında denetim misyonunda bulunmaktadır. Greenpeace geleneksel ulus üstü kurumlardan farklı olarak; finansal açıdan bağımsız ve kuruluş olarak devlet dışı üyelere yani sivil katılımcılara dayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada küresel ve geleneksel ulus üstü aktörlerden farklı olarak gelişen Greenpeace incelenmektedir. Greenpeace’in devletler, özel şirketler ve ulus üstü kurumlar ile olan etkileşimi ve çevre politikalarındaki rolü analiz edilmektedir. Her ne kadar ulus devletlerin önemi devam ediyor olsa da Greenpeace örneğinde olduğu gibi devletlerin egemenlik alanları zedelenmektedir. Çevre sorunları gibi konularda Greenpeace gibi kuruluşların etkili oldukları görülmektedir.

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma bilimsel araştırma ve yayın etiği kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanmıştır. Çalışmanın tüm aşamalarında dürüstlük, şeffaflık ve akademik etik ilkelerine riayet edilmiştir.

Thanks

Yayında emeği geçen dergi editörleri ve hakemlere teşekkür ederim.

References

  • Akbal, İ. ve Çalı, H. (2008). Çevreci sivil toplum örgütlerinde sivil itaatsizlik uygulamaları ve Greenpeace Türkiye örneği. Akdemir, A. (Ed.). V. Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Kongresi: Küresel Barış içinde (s. 399-408). Çanakkale: Aynalı Gazetecilik ve Matbaacılık.
  • Alphan, M. (2012, 6 Aralık). Keşke iş Zara’yla bitse. Hürriyet. Erişim adresi: https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/melis-alphan/keske-is-zara-yla-bitse-22086620
  • Arslan, H. (2011). Bir doğrudan eylem hareketi olarak Greenpeace (Yeşil Barış). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, 247-258.
  • Bernhardt, C. (2017). Governance, statehood, ve space in 20th century political struggles: An introduction. Historical Social Research, 42(2), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.42.2017.2.199-217
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  • Cicioğlu, F. ve Bostancı, B. (2017). Uluslararası sistemde hükümet-dışı örgütlenmeler: Greenpeace örneği. PESA Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 71-82.
  • Doruk, E. (2021). Antarktika antlaşmalar sistemi kapsamında çevre örgütlerinin rolü: Antarktika ve Güney Okyanusu Koalisyonu örneği. International Journal of Politics ve Security, 3, 369-389. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.866970
  • Downie, C. (2014). Transnational actors in environmental politics: Strategies ve influence in long negotiations. Environmental Politics, 23(3), 376-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.875252
  • European Commission. (2022). Protecting journalists ve human rights defenders from strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-ve-policy/policies/justice-ve-fundamental-rights/democracy-eu-citizenship-anti-corruption/democracy-ve-electoral-rights/protecting-journalists-ve-human-rights-defenders-strategic-lawsuits-against-public-participation_en
  • European Parliament. (2023a). COP28 climate talks agree on transitioning away from fossil fuels. European Parliament News. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231205IPR15686/cop28-climate-talks-agree-on-transitioning-away-from-fossil-fuels
  • European Parliament. (2023b). Written question E-003706/2023 on environmental regulations for private jets. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-003706_EN.html
  • Gonzaga, D. (2023, 28 Nisan). Victory! After Greenpeace report, Hyundai construction equipment commits to help stopping illegal mining in the Amazon. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/59521/victory-after-greenpeace-report-hyundai-construction-equipment-commits-to-help-stopping-illegal-mining-in-the-amazon/
  • Greenpeace Akdeniz. (2022a). Küresel Plastik Anlaşması: plastik kirliliğini sona erdirmek için büyük, cesur adım. Greenpeace dergisi, S. 172. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-turkey-stateless/2022/06/7d7a5444-gp172_dijital_mart2022.pdf
  • Greenpeace Akdeniz. (2022b). 2022’de birlikte neler başardık. Greenpeace Akdeniz Dergisi, S. 181. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-turkey-stateless/2023/02/2050c883-gp_181.pdf
  • Greenpeace Akdeniz. (2025). Başarılar. https://www.greenpeace.org/turkey/greenpeace-turkiyenin-elde-ettigi-basarilar/
  • Greenpeace Belçika. (2022). Rechtszaak tegen miljardeninvestering van INEOS in plasticfabriek Antwerpen. https://www.greenpeace.org/belgium/nl/persbericht/28119/rechtszaak-tegen-miljardeninvestering-van-ineos-in-plasticfabriek-antwerpen/
  • Greenpeace International. (2023). UN Ocean Treaty formally adopted, as the race to ratification begins. Greenpeace International. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/60330/un-ocean-treaty-formally-adopted-race-ratification-begins/
  • Greenpeace International. (2024). ITLOS sets groundbreaking victory for ocean ve climate protection. Greenpeace International. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/67125/itlos-sets-groundbreaking-victory-for-ocean-ve-climate-protection/
  • Greenpeace Türkiye. (2024, 2 Aralık). Norveç’te derin deniz madenciliği planları durduruldu. Greenpeace Türkiye Blog. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/turkey/blog/norvecte-derin-deniz-madenciligi-planlari-durduruldu/
  • Greenpeace. (2024). Who is Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/GP-11-14-Intro-Final.pdf
  • Greenpeace. (2025). Stopping offshore drilling. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/protect-the-arctic/stopping-offshore-drilling/
  • Haber Ekonomi. (2014, 9 Ekim). LEGO, Shell ile 50 yıllık işbirliğini sonlveırma kararı verdi. Erişim adresi: https://www.haberekonomi.com.tr/index.asp?sayfa=haber&icerik=3681
  • Hale, T. (2020). Transnational actors ve transnational governance in global environmental politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 203-220.
  • Hansen, P. K. ve Lundholt, M. W. (2021). I thought Shell was the bad guy: Narrative ve fictionality in Greenpeace's campaign against the LEGO-Shell partnership. Narrative, 29(1), 29-46.
  • Hanson, J. (2023, 19 Haziran). How we got a global ocean treaty – ve what comes next. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/60272/how-we-got-global-ocean-treaty-what-comes-next/
  • Hipp, R. (2023, 15 Nisan). Tschüss, Atomkraft: The end of nuclear power in Germany. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/59219/tschuss-atomkraft-end-nuclear-power-germany/
  • Karagöz, K. (2013). Yeni medya çağında dönüşen toplumsal hareketler ve dijital aktivizm hareketleri. İletişim ve Diplomasi, 1, 131-156.
  • Kolombo, L. (2022, 16 Ağustos). How we’re fighting the oil industry in the Argentine Sea. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/55252/fighting-oil-industry-argentinesea
  • Leman, M. (2025, 6 Mart). Battling the giants: How Greenpeace fights back against SLAPP lawsuits. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/69821/battling-the-giants-how-greenpeace-fights-back-against-slapp-lawsuits/
  • Moloney, K. ve Legrve, T. (2024). Actors, alterations, ve authorities: Three observations of global policy ve its transnational administration. Policy ve Society, 43(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae003 NTV Haber. (2010, 20 Mayıs). Orangutanlar kurtuldu mu? Erişim adresi: https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/orangutanlar-kurtuldu-mu,AjCIFzgg40ClKI3GqB3rnQ
  • Okumu, S., Fournier, L., Alejvera, M. ve Barney, S. (2024, 4 Haziran). Can an ocean court victory power the climate justice movement? Yes, ve here’s why. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/67499/ocean-court-itlos-climate-justice-advisory-opinion-legal-ruling-explained/
  • Onur, G. ve Kocabay, Ş. N. (2024). Çevre ve ekoloji örgütlerinin iletişim perspektiflerine sosyal medya aracılığıyla bakmak: Kuzey Ormanları Savunması ve Greenpeace International örneği. Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 60-83. https://doi.org/10.61766/hire.1493687
  • Price, C. (2023). Greenpeace ve the online genetically modified food debate in the UK: The role of science ve scientific evidence in environmental representation. Public Understveing of Science, 32(4), 489-503.
  • Saatçioğlu, E. (2017). Sivil toplum örgütlerinin sosyal medya kullanımları: Greenpeace Türkiye Facebook sayfası örneği. Selçuk İletişim, 10(1), 158-187. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.330941
  • Sevinç, G. (2023). COP15: Yerli halkların tanınması için büyük kazanım ama biyoçeşitliliğin korunması için daha fazlası gerekiyor. https://www.greenpeace.org/turkey/blog/cop15-yerli-halklarin-taninmasi-icin-buyuk-kazanim-ama-biyocesitliligin-korunmasi-icin-daha-fazlasi-gerekiyor/
  • Strømsnes, K., Selle, P. ve Grendstad, G. (2009). Environmentalism between state ve local community: Why Greenpeace has failed in Norway. Environmental Politics, 18(3), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010902823774
  • United Nations General Assembly. (2023). Resolution 77/276: Request for an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the obligations of states in respect of climate change. International Court of Justice press office & United Nations. https://www.icj-cij.org/node/202671
  • United Nations. (2023b). COP28 ends with call to ‘transition away’ from fossil fuels; UN Chief says phaseout is inevitable. United Nations. https://unsdg.un.org/latest/stories/cop28-ends-call-%E2%80%98transition-away%E2%80%99-fossil-fuels-un-chief-says-phaseout-inevitable
  • Wagner, C., Cresta, F. ve Kuen, T. L. (2024, 19 Aralık). Hope is created through action: Climate ve environmental victories of 2024. Greenpeace. Erişim adresi: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/71853/hope-is-created-through-action-climate-environmental-victories-of-2024/
  • Yalçın, A. (2024). Küresel kuruluşların eğitim ve kültürel konularla ilgili faaliyetleri. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1428728
  • Yıldız, E. (2018). Sivil toplum kuruluşlarının yaptıkları kampanyaların kurum politikalarına etkisi. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, 16, 354-367.
  • Zelko, F. (2017). Scaling Greenpeace: From local activism to global governance. Historical Social Research, 42(2), 318-342. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.42.2017.2.318-342
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Public Administration
Journal Section Review
Authors

Mahmut Özdemirkol 0000-0003-4878-9947

Submission Date February 12, 2026
Acceptance Date March 11, 2026
Publication Date March 26, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.48064/equinox.1887954
IZ https://izlik.org/JA89HS82YL
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özdemirkol, M. (2026). Aktivist Bir Hareketten Küresel Bir Aktöre: Greenpeace Küresel Çevre Yönetişiminde Ne Kadar Etkilidir? Ekinoks Ekonomi İşletme Ve Siyasal Çalışmalar Dergisi, 13(1), 82-104. https://doi.org/10.48064/equinox.1887954


   17289          17290       17291       17295  17296     17292       17286         17288       17294  

17362    17456    17457    22454


Equinox Journal of Economics Business and Political Studies