Review
BibTex RIS Cite

ANALOGICAL MEASUREMENTS USED IN TIMBRE ANALYSIS

Year 2022, Volume: 36 Issue: 4, 1882 - 1901, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1179608

Abstract

The concept of timbre is a phenomenon that is evaluated and tried to be expressed within the scope of music technology and at every stage of music production. The wavelength, intensity and amplitude of the signals obtained from the sound source, properties such as the envelope structure affect the timbre and can be explained physically. Phenomena such as tonal quality and tonal color, which are included in the concept of timbre, have created a chaotic process how to express them in a psychoacoustic evaluation. Used when defining sound color and quality; soft, rich, veiled, light, dull, bright, dark, treble, low, grating, etc. Many expressions are used. In this context, music theorists tried to make this confusion more understandable and developed criteria that included analogical approaches in line with a multidisciplinary study. At the same time, theorists have revealed that the image obtained in audio signal analyzes using spectrograms are approaches that can be analysed and evaluated. This study examines the analogical approaches of Cogan, Blake & Lavengood, which were developed to analyze the concept of timbre, which were obtained and accessible as a result of qualitative research methods and literature review, and a synthesis of historical spectrogram analysis approaches related to timbre was presented.

References

  • Allison, D. (1999). Structuralism. İçinde R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (Second Edition) (ss. 882-884). Cambridge University Press.
  • Bal,N. P., Murat, M., & Erkan, B. (2020). Soyut düşünme becerileri açısından hikâyeler üzerinde analojik düşünme. The Journal of International Education Science, 25(7), 29-55.
  • Bartlett, B., & Bartlett, J., (2009). Practical recording techniques. Focal Press.
  • Blake, D. (2012). Timbre as differentiation in Indie music. Music Theory Online a Journal of the Society for Music Theory, 2(18),1-18.
  • Cogan, R. & Escot, P. (1976). Sonic design: The nature of sound and music. Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Cogan, R. (1984). New images of musical sound. Harvard University Press.
  • d’Escrivan, J. (2012). Music technology. Cambridge University Press.
  • De Vale, S.C. (1985). Prolegomena to a study of harp and voice sounds in Uganda: A graphic system for the notation of texture. In Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology, 5, 250–281.
  • Fales, C. (2002). The paradox of timbre. Ethnomusicology, 46(1), 56–95.
  • Fischer, O. (2019). Analogy in language and linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  • Gallagher, M. (2009). The music tech dictionary: A glossary of audio-related terms and technologies. Course Technology.
  • Herdman, E. A. (2006). Derleme makale yazımında, konferans ve bildiri sunumu hazırlamada pratik bilgiler (Çev. Z. Dörtbudak). Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 3(1), 2-4.
  • Hosken, D. (2011). An introduction to music technology. Routledge.
  • Howard, D. M., & Angus, A. S. J. (2017). Acoustics and psychoacoustics. Routledge.
  • Huber, D. M., & Runstein, R. E. (2018). Modern Recording Techniques. Focal Press.
  • Jakobson, R. & Waugh, L. (1987). The sound shape of language. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Jensen, K. (2002). The timbre model. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2238-2238.
  • Krumhansl C. L. (1989). Why is musical timbre so hard to understand? In Structure and Perception of Electroacoustic. İçinde Nielzén S. & Olsson O. (Eds). Sound and Music, (ss. 43–53). Elsevier.
  • Lavengood, M. (2017). A new approach to the analysis of timbre. City University of New York.
  • LeBrecht, J. & Kaye, D. (2013). Sound and music for the theatre. Focal Press.
  • Rajagopalan, K. (2011). Structuralism. İçinde P. Stranzy (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics, (ss. 1041 – 1042). Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Savage, S. (2011). The art of digital audio recording. Oxford University Press.
  • Schroder, C. (2011). The book of audacity. No Starch Press.
  • Slawson, W. (1981). The color of sound: A theoretical study in musical timbre. Music Theory Spectrum, 3(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/746139
  • Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of phonology. University of California Press.

TINI ANALİZLERİNDE KULLANILAN ANALOJİK ÖLÇÜTLER

Year 2022, Volume: 36 Issue: 4, 1882 - 1901, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1179608

Abstract

Tını kavramı müzik teknolojisi kapsamında ve müzik prodüksiyonunun her aşamasında değerlendirilen ve ifade edilmeye çalışılan bir olgudur. Ses kaynağından elde edilen sinyallerin dalga boyu, şiddeti ve genliği, zarf yapısı gibi özellikleri tınıya etki etmekte ve fiziksel olarak açıklanabilmektedir. Tını kavramı içinde yer alan tonal kalite ve ses rengi gibi olgular ise psikoakustik bir değerlendirmede ne şekilde ifade edileceği kaotik bir süreç meydana getirmiştir. Ses rengi ve kalitesini tanımlanırken kullanılan; yumuşak, zengin, örtülü, açık, donuk, parlak, karanlık, tiz, pes, ızgara vb. çok sayıda ifade kullanlmıştır. Bu bağlamda müzik teorisyenleri bu karmaşayı daha anlaşılır hale getirme çabaları ve multidisipliner bir çalışma doğrultusunda analojik yaklaşımları içeren ölçütler geliştirmiştir. Aynı zamanda teorisyenler, spektogram kullanılarak yapılan ses sinyali analizlerinde elde edilen görüntünün analojik olarak analiz ve değerlendirme yapılabilecek yaklaşımlar ortaya koymuşlardır. Bu çalışma, nitel araştırma yöntemleri ve literatür taraması sonucunda elde edilen ve ulaşılabilen, tını kavramının analiz edilebilmesi için geliştirilen Cogan, Blake ve Lawengood’un analojik yaklaşımlarını incelemiş ve tını ile ilgili tarihsel spektogram analizi yaklaşımlarının bir sentezini ortaya konmuştur.

References

  • Allison, D. (1999). Structuralism. İçinde R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (Second Edition) (ss. 882-884). Cambridge University Press.
  • Bal,N. P., Murat, M., & Erkan, B. (2020). Soyut düşünme becerileri açısından hikâyeler üzerinde analojik düşünme. The Journal of International Education Science, 25(7), 29-55.
  • Bartlett, B., & Bartlett, J., (2009). Practical recording techniques. Focal Press.
  • Blake, D. (2012). Timbre as differentiation in Indie music. Music Theory Online a Journal of the Society for Music Theory, 2(18),1-18.
  • Cogan, R. & Escot, P. (1976). Sonic design: The nature of sound and music. Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Cogan, R. (1984). New images of musical sound. Harvard University Press.
  • d’Escrivan, J. (2012). Music technology. Cambridge University Press.
  • De Vale, S.C. (1985). Prolegomena to a study of harp and voice sounds in Uganda: A graphic system for the notation of texture. In Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology, 5, 250–281.
  • Fales, C. (2002). The paradox of timbre. Ethnomusicology, 46(1), 56–95.
  • Fischer, O. (2019). Analogy in language and linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  • Gallagher, M. (2009). The music tech dictionary: A glossary of audio-related terms and technologies. Course Technology.
  • Herdman, E. A. (2006). Derleme makale yazımında, konferans ve bildiri sunumu hazırlamada pratik bilgiler (Çev. Z. Dörtbudak). Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 3(1), 2-4.
  • Hosken, D. (2011). An introduction to music technology. Routledge.
  • Howard, D. M., & Angus, A. S. J. (2017). Acoustics and psychoacoustics. Routledge.
  • Huber, D. M., & Runstein, R. E. (2018). Modern Recording Techniques. Focal Press.
  • Jakobson, R. & Waugh, L. (1987). The sound shape of language. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Jensen, K. (2002). The timbre model. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2238-2238.
  • Krumhansl C. L. (1989). Why is musical timbre so hard to understand? In Structure and Perception of Electroacoustic. İçinde Nielzén S. & Olsson O. (Eds). Sound and Music, (ss. 43–53). Elsevier.
  • Lavengood, M. (2017). A new approach to the analysis of timbre. City University of New York.
  • LeBrecht, J. & Kaye, D. (2013). Sound and music for the theatre. Focal Press.
  • Rajagopalan, K. (2011). Structuralism. İçinde P. Stranzy (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics, (ss. 1041 – 1042). Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Savage, S. (2011). The art of digital audio recording. Oxford University Press.
  • Schroder, C. (2011). The book of audacity. No Starch Press.
  • Slawson, W. (1981). The color of sound: A theoretical study in musical timbre. Music Theory Spectrum, 3(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/746139
  • Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of phonology. University of California Press.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Kadri Yılmaz Erdal 0000-0003-1257-1751

Publication Date December 30, 2022
Submission Date September 24, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 36 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Erdal, K. Y. (2022). TINI ANALİZLERİNDE KULLANILAN ANALOJİK ÖLÇÜTLER. Erciyes Akademi, 36(4), 1882-1901. https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1179608

ERCİYES AKADEMİ | 2021 | erciyesakademi@erciyes.edu.tr Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.