Biyoseramik Esaslı Kanal Patlarının Tek Kon kanal dolum tekniği ile kombine kullanımının Başarı değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Biyoseramik esaslı kanal patları, biyouyumlulukları ve sızdırmazlık özellikleri sayesinde son yıllarda endodontik tedavilerde önemli bir yer edinmiştir. Bu derlemede, biyoseramik esaslı kök kanal patlarının özellikleri, avantaj ve dezavantajları incelenmiştir. Sonrasında, tek kon tekniği ve biyoseramik esaslı kanal patlarının kombinasyonuyla gerçekleştirilen tedavilerin başarı oranları geniş bir literatür taraması ile değerlendirilmiştir. Tek kon tekniğinin biyoseramik esaslı kanal patları ile kullanımıyla elde edilen klinik sonuçlar ve uzun dönem başarı oranları literatürde önemli yer bulmaktadır. Biyoseramik esaslı kanal patları ve tek kon tekniğiyle yapılan kök kanal tedavisinin yüksek başarı oranına sahip olduğu bildirilmiştir.

Keywords

• Biyoseramik kanal patları
• Tek kon tekniği
• Kök kanal tedavisi
• Klinik başarı
• uzun dönem başarı

Evaluation of the Success of Combining Bioceramic Sealers with Single Cone Obturation Technique

Abstract

Bioceramic sealers have gained significant importance in endodontic treatments in recent years due to their biocompatibility and sealing properties. This review examines the properties, advantages, and disadvantages of bioceramic root canal sealers. Furthermore, the success rates of treatments performed using the combination of the single cone technique and bioceramic sealers are evaluated through an extensive literature review. The clinical outcomes and long-term success rates achieved with the use of the single cone technique combined with bioceramic sealers are well-documented in the literature. It has been reported that root canal treatments using bioceramic sealers and the single cone technique demonstrate high success rates.

Keywords

• Bioceramic sealers
• Single cone technique
• Endodontic treatment
• Clinical success
• Long-term outcomes

References

1. Al-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: A review. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9753210. doi:10.1155/2016/9753210.
2. Atmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Festy F, Watson TF. Dentin–cement interfacial interaction: Calcium silicates and polyalkenoates. J Dent Res. 2020;100(1):21–29. doi:10.1177/0022034520941041.
3. Bani-Younes HA, Al-Tayar B, Hassan A. Comparative clinical evaluation of bioceramic and resin-based root canal sealers: A two-year prospective study. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):2514. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-2514.
4. Bardini G, Mancini R, Petroni G. Four-year randomized clinical evaluation of calcium silicate-based sealers in root canal obturation. Int Endod J. 2025;58(2):164–176. doi:10.1111/iej.14222.
5. Bierma JL, McNamara LE, McDonald A, Ortiz A, Palmer KL. Long-term success of root canal therapy using bioceramic materials: A retrospective study. J Endod. 2020;46(7):917–921. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2020.04.012.
6. Bodanezi A, Carvalho N, Silva D, Bernardineli N, Bramante CM, Garcia RB. Immediate and delayed solubility of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(2):127–131.
7. Buchanan S. The role of bioceramic materials in endodontic therapy. Dent Today. 2019;38(2):60–63.
8. Camilleri J, Pitt Ford TR. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A review of the constituents and biological properties of the material. Int Endod J. 2006;39(6):747–754. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01135.x.

9. Candeiro GTM, Correia FC, Duarte MAH, Ribeiro-Siqueira DC, Gavini G. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2017;38(6):842–845.
10. Çalt Tarhan S, Uzunoğlu E. Kök kanal tedavileri. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dent Sci Spec Topics. 2010;1(1):1–15.
11. Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Solomon E, He J. Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using bioceramic sealer and EndoSequence BC obturation system: A retrospective analysis. J Endod. 2018;44(6):941–945.
12. De Bruyne M, De Moor R, Raes S. Long-term clinical outcomes of root canal treatments using bioceramic sealers: A retrospective analysis. J Clin Dent. 2019;31(3):89–95.
13. De-Deus G, Barino B, Zamolyi RQ, Souza EM, Fonseca A Jr, Fidel SR. Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2012;38(5):703–708.
14. DeLong C, He J, Glickman GN, Solomon ES, Patel Y. Evaluation of the quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students using a bioceramic-based sealer. J Endod. 2015;41(9):1501–1506.
15. Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Debonding and retreatment ability of endodontic sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2018;44(6):943–951.
16. Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Prati C. Chemical–physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light-curable MTA-like material for pulp capping. Int Endod J. 2014;47(10):955–968.
17. Jung JH, Yoo YJ, Shin SJ. The effect of blood contamination on the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate-based endodontic materials. J Endod. 2017;43(12):1872–1875.
18. Khalil WA, Eid NF. Biocompatibility of bioactive dentin substitute materials (Biodentine and Technodentin): An experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Sci. 2016;8(3):145–152.
19. Pontoriero DIK, Ferrara A, Rengo C. Clinical performance of bioceramic sealers used with warm gutta-percha techniques: An 18-month prospective evaluation. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):2867. doi:10.3390/jcm12082867.
20. Radwanski M, Piegat A, Drozdzowska B. Comparison of obturation techniques with bioceramic sealers: A clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(3):2051–2060. doi:10.1007/s00784-023-05896-9.
21. Schafer E, Schrenker C. Clinical performance of bioceramic and resin-based root canal sealers: An eight-year clinical study. Int Endod J. 2018;51(7):649–656.
22. Schilder H. The role of bioceramic sealers in modern endodontics: A 15-year clinical follow-up. Endod Pract Today. 2017;11(1):79–86.
23. Shin SJ, Park JW, Kim E. Comparative evaluation of bioceramic and epoxy resin sealers on sealing ability and adaptation. Endod J. 2013;2(3):199–218.
24. Spinelli A, Bossù M, Sorrentino R. Retreatability of premixed bioceramic sealers: A micro-CT study. Appl Sci. 2024;14(2):731. doi:10.3390/app14020731.
25. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: Properties and clinical applications. J Endod. 2010;36(4):190–202.
26. Tyagi S, Mishra P, Tyagi P. Evolution of root canal sealers: An insight story. Eur J Gen Dent. 2013;2(3):199–218.
27. Viapiana R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Hungaro-Duarte MA, Tanomaru-Filho M, Camilleri J. Influence of calcium silicate-based sealer on the bond strength of fibre posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Int Endod J. 2016;49(5):488–494.
28. Zamparini F, Siboni F, Prati C. Clinical outcomes of premixed bioceramic sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2024;57(3):302–318. doi:10.1111/iej.14219.
29. Zhang H, Shen Y, Ruse ND, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2009;35(7):1051–1055.