Marginal Adaptation in Fixed Prosthetic Restorations

Abstract

Marginal fit plays an important role for a dental restoration.  The degradation of cement in oral cavity can result in loss of marginal seal, retention of plague, development of secondary dental caries and periodontal diseases.Increasing marginal discrepancy results in progressive cement dissolution. The aim of this study was to discuss the factors effecting the marginal adaptation and informing about the methods which have been used to evaluate the marjinal adaptation between tooth structure and restorative materials.

Keywords

• marginal adaptation
• morphological criteria
• prosthetic restoration

Sabit Protetik Restorasyonlarda Marjinal Adaptasyon

Abstract

Restorasyonların marjinal uyumu yetersiz olduğu durumlarda, zaman içerisinde yapıştırıcı simanın çözünmesi ile diş ve restorasyon arasında oluşacak olan boşluğu bakteri ve yiyecek artıkları doldurur. Bu durum plak birikimi ile sonuçlanır. Bu aralık alanda toplanan plak zaman içerisinde çürüklere, periodontal dokularda hasara ve sonuç olarak protezin başarısızlığına neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı marjinal adaptasyonu etkileyen faktörleri tartışmak ve diş yapısı ile restoratif materyal arasındaki marjinal adaptasyonu inceleme yöntemleri hakkında bilgi vermektir.

Keywords

• marjinal adaptasyon
• morfolojik kriteler
• protetik restorasyon

References

1. 1. American Dental Association. ANSI/ADA Specification No.8 for zinc phosphate cement. In: Guide to Dental Materials and Devices. 5th ed, Chicago, 1971
2. 2. Anusavice KJ. Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations. Criteria of Placement and Replacement. Quintessence publishing Co. Inc., Chicago, 1989
3. 3. Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortionof 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93:346-55
4. 4. Bindl A, Windisch S, Mormann WH. Full-ceramic CAD/CAM anterior crowns and copings. Int J Comput Dent 1989; 2:97-111.
5. 5. Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, Della Bona A. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2011;27(11):1119-26.
6. 6. Coli P, Karlsson S. Fit of a new pressuresintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont 2004;1 7:59-64.
7. 7. Conrad HJ, Wook-Jin Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98:389-404.
8. 8. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(6):447-54.e10.

9. 9. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive Metal Free Restorations. Current Concepts for the Esthetic Treatment of Posterior Teeth, Quintessence publishing Co.Inc., Chicago, 1997
10. 10. Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M, Kohorst P. Stresses and distortions within zirconia-fixed dental prostheses due to the veneering process. Acta Biomater 2009; 5(8):3231-9.
11. 11. Emiroglu S, Evren B, Kulak Ozkan Y. Effect of Cements at Different Temperatures on the Clinical Performance and Marginal Adaptation of Inlay‐Onlay Restorations In Vivo. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(4):302-09.
12. 12. Garcia AJ, Santana FB, Szalay ER. Marginal adaptation and microleakage comparison between two zirconia oxide systems. R Odonto Mexicana 2011;15(2):101-6.
13. 13. Gassino G, Monfrin SB, Scanu M, Spina G, Preti G. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: A new in vitro 360 degree external examination procedure. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:218-23.
14. 14. Gavelis JR, Morency JD, Riley ED, Sozio RB. The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seat of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45(2):138-145.
15. 15. Gavelis JR, Morency JD, Riley ED, Sozio RB. The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seat of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2004;138–145.
16. 16. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Alkumru HN. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(3):273-83.
17. 17. Goldin EB, Boyd NW, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Thompson VP. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramicpressed-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93:143-7.
18. 18. Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102: 378-84.
19. 19. Good ML, Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Quantification of all-ceramic crown margin surface profile from try-in to 1-week post-cementation. J Dent 2009;37(1):65-75
20. 20. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:363-376.
21. 21. Göhring TN, Roos M. Inlay‐fixed partial dentures adhesively retained and reinforced by glass fibers: clinical and scanning electron microscopy analysis after five years. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(1):60-69.
22. 22. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(1):40-9.
23. 23. Guess PC, Strub JR, Steinhart N, Wolkewitz M, Stappert CF. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations—midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study. J Dent. 2009;37(8):627-37.
24. 24. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part І: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:10-15.
25. 25. Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater 2013;29(1):59-84.
26. 26. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 25:405-8.
27. 27. Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD. Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:492-8.
28. 28. Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara T. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2007;26(6):820-6.
29. 29. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35(2):116-22.
30. 30. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Appplied Dental Materials. 8th ed, Blackwell Science Ltd., Malden, USA,1998
31. 31. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107-11.
32. 32. Mitchell CA, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(6):575-84.
33. 33. Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and Reliability of Methods to Measure Marginal Adaptation of Crowns and FDPs: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont 2013; 3:97-111.
34. 34. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72(6):585-90.
35. 35. Pilo R, Cardash HS. In vivo retrospective study of cement thickness under crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79(6):621-5.
36. 36. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 2008; 24:1311-15.
37. 37. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(3):250-7.
38. 38. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adip SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the replica technique in the measurement of the fit of procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9(2):25-32.
39. 39. Rosenstiel SF, Martin FL, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed, Mosby, St. Louis, 2006.
40. 40. Roulet J, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack M. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc. 1989;3(1):147-58; discussion 58-9.
41. 41. Roulet JF, Herder S. Bonded ceramic inlays. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., Chicago, 1991
42. 42. Schillinburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed, Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc, 1997; 85-103,142-154.
43. 43. Shearer B, Gough MB, Setchell DJ. Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns. Biomaterials 1996;17(19):1891-5.
44. 44. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;1 0:478-84.
45. 45. Thordrup M, Isıdor F, Hörsned-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays:an in vitro study. J Dent 1994; 22:147-53.
46. 46. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent, 2007;35(1):68-73
47. 47. Van Dijken J, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent. 1994;22(5):265-72.
48. 48. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical Evaluation of Marginal Fit of a New Experimental All-Ceramic System Before and After Cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:587-92.
49. 49. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(5):459-64.
50. 50. Yildiz C, Vanlioğlu BA, Evren B, Uludamar A, Ozkan YK. (2013). Marginal-internal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM crown restorations. Dent Mater J 2013;32(1):42-7.