Review
BibTex RIS Cite

The bonding mechanism between zirconia framework and veneer ceramics and affecting factors

Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 63 - 68, 28.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.35333/ERD.2019.15

Abstract

 All-ceramic restorations are preferred in fixed prosthodontics treatments as a result of increasing esthetic expectations. Zirconium-oxide based ceramics offer advanced esthetic and mechanical features, bio-compatibility, decreased plaque accumulation and low thermal conductivity. Zirconia-based restorations are considered to be an alternative treatment method to conventional metal ceramic restorations. However it is known that zirconia based ceramic has increased opacity due to its high crystalline content. Esthetic expectations limited the monolitic usage of zirconia and require veneering with a ceramic which has optimal colour and transluceny. The bond strength between zirconia and veneering ceramic is affected by the factors like surface treatments applied on zirconia cores, the mechanical properties of veneer ceramics and the application methods of ceramics. But the bonding mechanism between zirconia and veneering ceramic is still unknown. This article offers a review of the literature about the factors affecting the bond strength between zirconia cores and veneer ceramics ceramics and their bonding mechanism.


References

  • 1) Aboushelib MN, Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(10), 984-91.
  • 2) Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater. 2006; 22(9), 857-63.
  • 3) Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strenght of different components of core veneered all- ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:9-13.
  • 4) Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37:641- 652.
  • 5) Almeida AA, Longhini D, Domingues NB, Santos C, Adabo GL. Effects of extreme cooling methods on mechanical properties and shear bond strength of bilayered porcelain/3Y-TZP specimens J Dent. 2013; 41: 356-62.
  • 6) Ban S, Sakakibara T, Yoshihara K, Takeuchi M, Kawai T, Murakami H, Kono H. Surface properties of dental zirconia after clinical grinding and polishing. Key Eng Mater. 2013; 24:501–506.
  • 7) Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High- strength CAD/CAM fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings- a new fabrication mode for all ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(1):121-8.
  • 8) Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91(4):356-62.
  • 9) Casucci A, Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Morphological analysis of three zirconium oxide ceramics: Effect of surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2010;26(8):751-60.
  • 10) Casucci A, Osorio E, Osorio R, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M. Influence of different surface treatments on surface zirconia frameworks. J Dent. 2009;37(11):891-7.
  • 11) Chevalier J, Gremillardw L. The Tetragonal-Monoclinic Transformation in Zirconia: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. J Am Ceram Soc. 2009; 92 [9] 1901–1920.
  • 12) Chintapalli RK, Marro FG, Jimenez-Pique E, Anglada M. Phase transformation and subsurface damage in 3Y-TZP after sandblasting. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:566-572.
  • 13) De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 242-51.
  • 14) Denry I, Kelly R. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(3):299- 307.
  • 15) Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dent Mater. J 2008; 27:448-454.
  • 16) Fischer J, Stawarczyk B. Compatibility of machined Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and a veneering ceramic. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1500-5.
  • 17) Fischer J, Zbaren C, Stawarczyk B, et al. The effect of thermal cycling on metalceramic bond strength. J Dent. 2009; 37: 549-553.
  • 18) Göstemeyer G, Jendras M, Dittmer MP, Bach FW, Stiesch M, Kohorst P. Influence of cooling rate on zirconia veneer interfacial adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6: 4532-8.
  • 19) Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent. 2005; 33(1): 9-18.
  • 20) Harding AB, Norling BK, Teixeira EC. The effect of surface treatment of the interfacial surface on fatigue-related microtensile bond strength of milled zirconia to veneering porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21:346-352.
  • 21) Hegenbarth EA. Estetik ve zirkonyum dioksit çelişki mi? Quintessence Int . 2007;1: 53-66.
  • 22) Isgro G, Kleverlaan CJ, Wang H, Feilzer AJ. The Influence of Multiple Firing on Thermal Contraction of Ceramic Materials Used for the Fabrication of Layered All-Ceramic Dental Restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 557-64.
  • 23) Kelly J.R. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 513-530.
  • 24) Kim HJ, Lim HP, Park YJ, Vang MS. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105:315-322.
  • 25) Kwon JE. Lee SH, Lim HN, Kim HS. Bonding characteristics between zirconia core and veneering porcelain. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 42.
  • 26) Liu D, Matinlinna JP, Tsoi JK, Pow EH, Miyazaki T, Shibata Y. A new modified laser pretreatment for porcelain zirconia bonding. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:559-565.
  • 27) Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradationaging of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2010; 26(8):807-820.
  • 28) Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17(1):9-13.
  • 29) Munoz-Saldana J, Balmori-Ramirez H, Jaramillo-Vigueras D, Iga T, Schneider GA. Mechanical properties and low temperature aging of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals pressed by hot isostatic pressing. J Mater Res. 2003; 18: 2415e26.
  • 30) Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Bonding between resin luting cement and glass infiltrated alumina-reinforced ceramics with silane coupling agent. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31(8):785-9.
  • 31) Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Zaima C, Nishida H, Kinuta S, Yatani H. Tensile bond strength between tooth-colored porcelain and sandblasted zirconia framework. J Prosthodont Res. 2009; 53:116-119.
  • 32) Nikzadjamnani S, Zarrati S, Rostamzadeh M. Microtensile Bond Strength Between Zirconia Core and Veneering Porcelain After Different Surface Treatments. J Dent. 2017; 14(6): 303–312.
  • 33) Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(6), 557-62.
  • 34) Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104:247-257.
  • 35) Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. In vitro chipping behaviour of all ceramic crowns with a zirconia framework and feldspathic veneering: comprasion of CAD/CAM produced veneer with manually layered veneer. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40: 519-25.
  • 36) Schmitter M, Schweiger M, Mueller D, Rues S. Effect on in vitro fracture resistance of the technique used to attach lithium disilicate ceramic veneer to zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 122-30.
  • 37) Silva N, Sailer I, Zhang Y, Coelho PG, Guess PC, Zembic A, Kohal RJ. Performance of zirconia for dental healthcare. Materials. 2010; 3: 863-896.
  • 38) Teng J, Wang H, Liao Y, Liang X. Evaluation of a conditioning method to improve core-veneer bond strength of zirconia restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107:380- 387.
  • 39) Tholey MJ, Berthold C, Swain MV, Thiel N. XRD2 micro-diffraction analysis of the interface between Y-TZP and veneering porcelain: role of application methods. Dent Mater. 2010;26(6):545-52.
  • 40) Trindade FZ, Amaral M, Melo RM, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Zirconia-porcelain bonding: effect of multiple firings on microtensile bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15: 467-472.
  • 41) Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Vaccaro F, Traini T, Russo S, Ferrari M. Acid etching surface treatment of feldspathic, alumina and zirconia ceramics: a micromorphological SEM analysis. Int Dent South Africa. 2006; 8:50–56.
  • 42) Zeighami S, Mahgoli H, Farid F, Azari A. The effect of multiple firings on microtensile bond strength of core-veneer zirconia-based all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont. 2013; 22: 49-53.

Zirkonyum Oksit Altyapı ve Veneer Seramik Bağlantı Mekanizması ve Bağlantıyı Etkileyen Faktörler

Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 63 - 68, 28.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.35333/ERD.2019.15

Abstract

Artan estetik beklentiler sonucunda sabit protetik tedavi yapımında tam seramik restorasyonlar kullanılmaktadır. Zirkonyum oksit ile güçlendirilmiş seramikler gelişmiş estetik ve mekanik özelliklere, biyouyumluluğa, düşük plak birikimine ve düşük termal iletkenliğe sahiptirler. Zirkonya altyapılı restorasyonların geleneksel metal altyapılı restorasyonlara alternatif bir tedavi olduğu düşünülmektedir. Ancak yapısındaki yüksek kristalin faz nedeniyle opak bir yapıya sahip olduğu bilinmektedir. Estetik gereksinimler zirkonyanın monolitik kullanımını sınırlandırarak, optimum renk ve translüsensiye sahip bir veneer seramiği ile kaplanmasını gerektirmektedir. Zirkonya alt yapı ve veneer seramiği arasındaki bağlantı; altyapıya uygulanan yüzey işlemleri, veneer seramiğine uygulanma yöntemi ve mekanik özellikleri gibi faktörlerden etkilenmektedir. Bağlantıyı etkileyen faktörler bilinmesine rağmen bağlantı mekanizması bilinmemektedir. Bu derleme; zirkonya ve veneer seramikler arasındaki bağlantı mekanizmasını ve etkileyen faktörler ile ilgili genel bilgi veren bir literatür taramasıdır.

 


References

  • 1) Aboushelib MN, Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(10), 984-91.
  • 2) Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater. 2006; 22(9), 857-63.
  • 3) Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strenght of different components of core veneered all- ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:9-13.
  • 4) Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37:641- 652.
  • 5) Almeida AA, Longhini D, Domingues NB, Santos C, Adabo GL. Effects of extreme cooling methods on mechanical properties and shear bond strength of bilayered porcelain/3Y-TZP specimens J Dent. 2013; 41: 356-62.
  • 6) Ban S, Sakakibara T, Yoshihara K, Takeuchi M, Kawai T, Murakami H, Kono H. Surface properties of dental zirconia after clinical grinding and polishing. Key Eng Mater. 2013; 24:501–506.
  • 7) Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High- strength CAD/CAM fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings- a new fabrication mode for all ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(1):121-8.
  • 8) Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91(4):356-62.
  • 9) Casucci A, Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Morphological analysis of three zirconium oxide ceramics: Effect of surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2010;26(8):751-60.
  • 10) Casucci A, Osorio E, Osorio R, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M. Influence of different surface treatments on surface zirconia frameworks. J Dent. 2009;37(11):891-7.
  • 11) Chevalier J, Gremillardw L. The Tetragonal-Monoclinic Transformation in Zirconia: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. J Am Ceram Soc. 2009; 92 [9] 1901–1920.
  • 12) Chintapalli RK, Marro FG, Jimenez-Pique E, Anglada M. Phase transformation and subsurface damage in 3Y-TZP after sandblasting. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:566-572.
  • 13) De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 242-51.
  • 14) Denry I, Kelly R. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(3):299- 307.
  • 15) Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dent Mater. J 2008; 27:448-454.
  • 16) Fischer J, Stawarczyk B. Compatibility of machined Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and a veneering ceramic. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1500-5.
  • 17) Fischer J, Zbaren C, Stawarczyk B, et al. The effect of thermal cycling on metalceramic bond strength. J Dent. 2009; 37: 549-553.
  • 18) Göstemeyer G, Jendras M, Dittmer MP, Bach FW, Stiesch M, Kohorst P. Influence of cooling rate on zirconia veneer interfacial adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6: 4532-8.
  • 19) Guazzato M, Quach L, Albakry M, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent. 2005; 33(1): 9-18.
  • 20) Harding AB, Norling BK, Teixeira EC. The effect of surface treatment of the interfacial surface on fatigue-related microtensile bond strength of milled zirconia to veneering porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21:346-352.
  • 21) Hegenbarth EA. Estetik ve zirkonyum dioksit çelişki mi? Quintessence Int . 2007;1: 53-66.
  • 22) Isgro G, Kleverlaan CJ, Wang H, Feilzer AJ. The Influence of Multiple Firing on Thermal Contraction of Ceramic Materials Used for the Fabrication of Layered All-Ceramic Dental Restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 557-64.
  • 23) Kelly J.R. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 513-530.
  • 24) Kim HJ, Lim HP, Park YJ, Vang MS. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105:315-322.
  • 25) Kwon JE. Lee SH, Lim HN, Kim HS. Bonding characteristics between zirconia core and veneering porcelain. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 42.
  • 26) Liu D, Matinlinna JP, Tsoi JK, Pow EH, Miyazaki T, Shibata Y. A new modified laser pretreatment for porcelain zirconia bonding. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:559-565.
  • 27) Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradationaging of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2010; 26(8):807-820.
  • 28) Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17(1):9-13.
  • 29) Munoz-Saldana J, Balmori-Ramirez H, Jaramillo-Vigueras D, Iga T, Schneider GA. Mechanical properties and low temperature aging of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals pressed by hot isostatic pressing. J Mater Res. 2003; 18: 2415e26.
  • 30) Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Bonding between resin luting cement and glass infiltrated alumina-reinforced ceramics with silane coupling agent. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31(8):785-9.
  • 31) Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Zaima C, Nishida H, Kinuta S, Yatani H. Tensile bond strength between tooth-colored porcelain and sandblasted zirconia framework. J Prosthodont Res. 2009; 53:116-119.
  • 32) Nikzadjamnani S, Zarrati S, Rostamzadeh M. Microtensile Bond Strength Between Zirconia Core and Veneering Porcelain After Different Surface Treatments. J Dent. 2017; 14(6): 303–312.
  • 33) Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(6), 557-62.
  • 34) Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104:247-257.
  • 35) Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. In vitro chipping behaviour of all ceramic crowns with a zirconia framework and feldspathic veneering: comprasion of CAD/CAM produced veneer with manually layered veneer. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40: 519-25.
  • 36) Schmitter M, Schweiger M, Mueller D, Rues S. Effect on in vitro fracture resistance of the technique used to attach lithium disilicate ceramic veneer to zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: 122-30.
  • 37) Silva N, Sailer I, Zhang Y, Coelho PG, Guess PC, Zembic A, Kohal RJ. Performance of zirconia for dental healthcare. Materials. 2010; 3: 863-896.
  • 38) Teng J, Wang H, Liao Y, Liang X. Evaluation of a conditioning method to improve core-veneer bond strength of zirconia restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107:380- 387.
  • 39) Tholey MJ, Berthold C, Swain MV, Thiel N. XRD2 micro-diffraction analysis of the interface between Y-TZP and veneering porcelain: role of application methods. Dent Mater. 2010;26(6):545-52.
  • 40) Trindade FZ, Amaral M, Melo RM, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Zirconia-porcelain bonding: effect of multiple firings on microtensile bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15: 467-472.
  • 41) Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Vaccaro F, Traini T, Russo S, Ferrari M. Acid etching surface treatment of feldspathic, alumina and zirconia ceramics: a micromorphological SEM analysis. Int Dent South Africa. 2006; 8:50–56.
  • 42) Zeighami S, Mahgoli H, Farid F, Azari A. The effect of multiple firings on microtensile bond strength of core-veneer zirconia-based all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont. 2013; 22: 49-53.
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Reviews
Authors

Merve Yıldırak

Şebnem Begüm Türker

Yasemin Özkan

Publication Date June 28, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yıldırak, M., Türker, Ş. B., & Özkan, Y. (2019). Zirkonyum Oksit Altyapı ve Veneer Seramik Bağlantı Mekanizması ve Bağlantıyı Etkileyen Faktörler. European Journal of Research in Dentistry, 3(1), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.35333/ERD.2019.15