Impression Techniques and Materials Used in Implant Supported Prosthetic Restorations: A Review

Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 124 - 132, 30.12.2019

Elcin Keskin Özyer , Erkut Kahramanoğlu Yılmaz Umut Aslan , Yasemin Özkan

https://doi.org/10.35333/ERD.2019.101

Abstract

In prosthodontics; acquiring the negative of the region to be rehabilitated in the most accurate way, directly affects the success of the restoration. The faults in choosing the impression material, tray selection and technique; may cause inequality in force distribution, prosthetic and abutment screw loosening and occlusal irregularities. For a successful restoration, the intraoral positions of the implants and their interrelationships must be exactly transferred to the main model and the precision of implant impression must be ensured.

            Compared to denture- supported prostheses and implant- based protheses, dental implants do not have periodontium and the ability to make orthodontic movements, restricts the ability to tolerate errors. Therefore more technical precision is needed in the measurement of implant supported prosthetic restorations.

            In this review; the impression techniques used in implant supported prosthetic restorations were described and in a wide range the innovations in taking impression were evaluated.

Keywords

Impression technique, impression material, implant supported prosthetic restorations

İmplant Destekli Protetik Restorasyonlarda Kullanılan Ölçü Yöntemleri ve Materyalleri: Derleme

Abstract

        Protetik diş tedavilerinde rehabilite edilecek bölgenin negatifini en doğru şekilde elde etmek, yapılacak olan restorasyonun başarısını doğrudan etkilemektedir. Kullanılan ölçü maddesi, kaşık seçimi ve ölçü tekniğinde yapılan hatalar; kuvvet dağılımında eşitsizlik, protez ve abutment vidası gevşemesi ve okluzal düzensizlikler gibi protetik komplikasyonlara neden olmaktadır. Başarılı bir restorasyon için implantların pozisyonlarının ve birbiriyle ilişkilerinin ana modele birebir transfer edilmesi ve ölçüde hassasiyetin sağlanması gerekmektedir.

        Diş destekli protezlerle implant üstü protezler karşılaştırıldığında, dental implantların periodonsiyum içermemesi ve ortodontik hareket yapma yeteneğinin bulunmaması ölçüde meydana gelecek uyum hatalarının tolere edilmesini kısıtlamaktadır. Bu nedenle implant üstü protetik restorasyonların ölçü işleminde çok daha fazla teknik hassasiyete ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

            Bu derleme geçmişten günümüze kullanılan ölçü maddelerinden bahsederek, implant üstü protetik restorasyonlarda kullanılan ölçü tekniklerini ve ölçü alımındaki yenilikleri geniş bir yelpazede incelemek amacı ile yazılmıştır.

Keywords

Ölçü teknikleri, ölçü materyalleri, implant destekli protezler

References

• Akalin ZF, Ozkan Y, Ekerim A. Efects of Implant Angulation, Impression Material, and Variation in Arch Curvature Width on Implant Transfer Model Accuracy. Int J Oral Maxıllofac Implants. 2013; 28:149–157.
• Aslan YU. Farklı ölçü maddelerinin boyutsal stabilite ve doğruluk, yüzey detayı, değme açısı ve ıslanabilirlik açısından değerlendirilmesi. M.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, 2012, İstanbul (Danışman: Prof. Dr. Yasemin Kulak Özkan).
• Baskai KG. Evaluation of Digital Implant Impressions using an Intra-oral Computerized Scanner (iTero) versus Conventional Implant Impressions: A 3-Dimensional Analysis of Accuracy. Science Faculty of Dentistry University, Thesis for the degree of Masters, 2014, Toronto. (Direct: Hasan ALKUMRU).
• Branemark PI. Introduction to osseointegration, in Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985; 11-76.
• Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N. Evaluation of accuracy of completearch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28:1512-1520.
• Cabral LM, Guedes CG, Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants. Implant Dent. 2007; 16:187-94.
• Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7: 468.
• Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in paralel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(5):761-8.
• Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, Delong R, Hodges JS. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97:349-356.
• Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative Dental Materals, 11th Edition. Toronto: Mosby Co.: 2002; 53-65.
• Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam Protezler. 3. Baskı. İstanbul: Quintessence: 1998; 147-160.
• Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004; 12:9- 14.
• De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:329-36.
• Del’Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Compagnoni MA, Molo Fde A Jr. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25:715-21.
• Donovan TE, Winston C. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin N Am. 2004; 48:445-470.
• Eliasson A, Ortorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012; 14:30–8.
• Endo T, Finger WJ. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37(1):47-51.
• Enkling N, Bayer S, Jöhren P, Mericske-Stern R. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14:144-151.
• Faria JC, Silva-Concílio LR, Neves AC, Miranda ME, Teixeira ML. Evaluation of the accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for multiple implants. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25:163-7.
• Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M. Influence of impression material and time on the 3 dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quint Int. 2007; 38:67-73.
• Jo SH, Kim KI, Seo JM, Song KY, Park JM, Ahn SG Ahn. Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions:an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010; 2:128-33.
• Júlio CBF, Laís RSC, Ana CCN, Milton EM, Marcelo LT. Evaluation of the accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for multiple implants. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25:8-2.
• Kahramanoğlu E, Kulak-Özkan Y. The effect of different restorative and abutment materials on marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit cantilever implant-supported fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(8):608-17.
• Kempler J. The Effect of Impression Technique, Connection Type and Implant Angulation on Impression Accuracy. Faculty of Graduate School of the University of Maryland, Master Thesis, 2011, Maryland (Direct: Assistant Professor Dr. Radi Masri).
• Kimoto K, Tanaka K, Toyoda M, Ochiai KT. Indirect latex glove contamination and its inhibitory effect on vinyl polysiloxane polymerization. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:433–8.
• Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99:107-113.
• Lee H, So S, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100:285-291.
• Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(6):715-9.
• Lee SJ, Cho SB. Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3:177-185.
• Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24:111-115.
• Lee SJ, Macarthur RX 4th, Gallucci GO. An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110:420-423.
• Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109:187-191.
• Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27:629-638.
• Misch CE. Presents the rationale for implant treatment with interesting statistics and demographic trends. In: Dental Implant Prosthetics, Morton LP, 0-323-01955-2, Mosby Co,: 2005; 13-15.
• Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:192-8.
• Naert I, Quirynen M, Theuniers G, Van Steenberghe D. Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65:671-80.
• Nassar U, Oko A, Adeeb S, El-Rich M, Flores-Mir C. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109:172-178.
• O’Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, 2002; 145-168.
• Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz SM, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracym of newly introduced elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14:265-268.
• Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:676-681.
• Patel N. Integrating three- dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141:20-24.
• Philips RW, Anusavice KJ. Philips Science of Dental Materials, 11th Ed. Philedelphia: Saunders Co.: 2007; 93-102.
• Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A, Chowdhary R. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2013; (16)3: 279-284.
• Rubel B, Impression materials: A comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N Am. 2007; 51:629- 642.
• Rupp F, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21(1) 69-71.
• Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010; 12:63-76.
• Şahin S, Çehreli MC, Yalçin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant supported prostheses–a review. J Dent. 2002; 30:271–82.
• Tokar E, Polat S, Uludağ B. Evaluation of effect of impression techniques to satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with implant-retained overdentures: a pilot study. 2017;27(2):100-106.
• Wee AG. Comparision of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:323-31.
• Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23:39-47.