Effect of Ultrasonic Agitation on the Microtensile Bond Strength for Cementing Ceramic Inlays

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 7 - 13, 19.06.2021

Ebru Sümer Ekin Yalçın Değer Zeynep Başağaoğlu Demirekin

https://doi.org/10.29228/erd.2

Abstract

Objectives: This in-vitro study was performed to assess the effect of ultrasonic agitation on microtensile bond strength [µTBS] of composite resin cements or self adhesive resin cements used for cementing ceramic inlays.
Materials and Methods: In the study, standardized Class 1 cavities were prepared on 72 human premolar teeth and impression was taken using elastomeric impression material. IPS e-max Press inlay restorations were prepared according to manufacturer’s instruction. HF acid [9.5%] and silane coupling agent was applied to the cementation surfaces of ceramic inlays. Firstly, teeth were randomly divided into four groups for four different resin cements [RelyX ARC, Panavia F 2.0, RelyX U200 and G-Cem] . And then, each resin cement group was divided into two subgroups according to the cementation by finger pressure or ultrasonic agitation. While 64 teeth were used for microtensile bond strength test, 8 teeth [including one in each group] were used for scanning electron microscopy evaluation. At the end of the microtensile test, samples were examined using a stereomicroscope for analysis of fracture type.
Results: The microtensile bond strengths of conventional resin cements [RelyX ARC and Panavia F 2.0] were significantly higher than self adhesive resin cements’ [RelyX U200 and G-Cem] bond strengths [p < 0.05] . In each cements’ subgroups, the two cementation techniques did not effect the microtensile bond strength of each cements [p > 0,05] . The effect of ultrasonic agitation on microtensile bond strength of resin cements was not statistically significant for all groups.
Conclusions: In the present study, the best bonding performances were achieved with the etch-and-rinse and self-etch systems. Ultrasonic agitation did not influence the microtensile bond strength of resin cements.

Keywords

ceramic inlays, ultrasonic agitation, microtensile bond strength, self adhesive resin cement

Supporting Institution

DÜAPK-Dicle University Research Project Council

Project Number

[DUBAP] -12-DH-05.

Seramik İnleylerin Simantasyonunda Ultrasonik Aktivasyonun Mikrogerilim Bağlantı Dayanımlarına Etkisi

Abstract

Project Number

[DUBAP] -12-DH-05.

References

• 1) Abo T, Uno S, Yoshiyama M, Yamada T, Hanada N. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramics. International journal of dentistry 2012;2012.
• 2) Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. dental materials 1998;14(1):51-56.
• 3) Bagis B, Turkarslan S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Uctasli S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of ultrasonic agitation on bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2008;10(6).
• 4) Bagis B, Turkaslan S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of high frequency ultrasonic agitation on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2009;11(5).
• 5) Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. dental materials 2004;20(2):191-97.
• 6) Bitter K, Paris S, Hartwig C, Neumann K, M. Kielbassa A. Shear bond strengths of different substrates bonded to lithium disilicate ceramics. Dental materials journal 2006;25(3):493-502.
• 7) Bott B, Hannig M. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. dental materials 2003;19(4):264-69.
• 8) Brentel AS, Özcan M, Valandro LF, Alarça LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. dental materials 2007;23(11):1323-31.
• 9) Brown B. How safe is diagnostic ultrasonography? Canadian Medical Association Journal 1984;131(4):307.
• 10) Buoncristiani J, Seto BG, Caputo AA. Evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instruments for intraradicular post removal. Journal of endodontics 1994;20(10):486-89.
• 11) Cantoro A, Goracci C, Carvalho CA, Coniglio I, Ferrari M. Bonding potential of self-adhesive luting agents used at different temperatures to lute composite onlays. Journal of dentistry 2009;37(6):454-61.
• 12) Cantoro A, Goracci C, Coniglio I, Magni E, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Influence of ultrasound application on inlays luting with self-adhesive resin cements. Clinical oral investigations 2011;15(5):617-23.
• 13) Ceylan Ö AF. Farklı kor seramiklerin ışık geçirgenliğinin incelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009;18:247-55.
• 14) Chang JC, Nguyen T, Duong JH, Ladd GD. Tensile bond strengths of dual-cured cements between a glass-ceramic and enamel. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1998;79(5):503-07.
• 15) D'arcangelo C, De Angelis F, D'amario M, Zazzeroni S, Ciampoli C, Caputi S. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations. Operative dentistry 2009;34(3):328-36.
• 16) De Angelis F, Minnoni A, Vitalone L, Carluccio F, Vadini M, Paolantonio M, et al. Bond strength evaluation of three self-adhesive luting systems used for cementing composite and porcelain. Operative dentistry 2011;36(6):626-34.
• 17) De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. dental materials 2004;20(10):963-71.
• 18) De Munck Jd, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of dental research 2005;84(2):118-32.
• 19) Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer J-M, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence International 1990;21(10).
• 20) Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramic. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2006;8(5):337-41 (Abstract).
• 21) Felver B, King DC, Lea SC, Price GJ, Walmsley AD. Cavitation occurrence around ultrasonic dental scalers. Ultrasonics sonochemistry 2009;16(5):692-97.
• 22) Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent 2008;10(5):393-98.
• 23) Fuentes MV, Ceballos L, González-López S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites. Clinical oral investigations 2013;17(3):717-24.
• 24) Garcia RN, Renzetti AGZ, Schaible BR, Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Miguel LCM. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to deep dentin. RSBO (Online) 2011;8(4):431-38.
• 25) Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites—a comparative study. dental materials 2006;22(10):934-41.
• 26) Goon WW. Efficient amalgam core elimination and root preservation with ultrasonic instrumentation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1992;68(2):261-64.
• 27) Guarda GB, Gonçalves LS, Correr AB, Moraes RR, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Luting glass ceramic restorations using a self-adhesive resin cement under different dentin conditions. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2010;18(3):244-48.
• 28) Hahn P, Schaller HG, Hafner P, Hellwig E. Effect of different luting procedures on the seating of ceramic inlays. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2000;27(1):1-8.
• 29) Hamouda IM, Samra NR, Badawi MF. Microtensile bond strength of etch and rinse versus self-etch adhesive systems. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2011;4(3):461-66.
• 30) Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. dental materials 2007;23(1):71-80.
• 31) Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schuhmacher C, Schläpfer R, Hämmerle C, Fischer J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. dental materials 2008;24(7):944-50.
• 32) Hubbezoğlu İ HF, Bolayır G. . Yeni nesil self-etching adeziv sistemlerin mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005;8(1):5-11.
• 33) Jensen M, Sheth J, Tolliver D. Etched-porcelain resin-bonded full-veneer crowns: in vitro fracture resistance. Compendium (Newtown, Pa) 1989;10(6):336-8, 40-1, 44-7.
• 34) Judge RB, Wilson P. The effects of oscillating forces upon the flow of dental cements. Journal of oral rehabilitation 1999;26(11):892-99.
• 35) Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one-and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2007;97(4):216-22.
• 36) Koyano E, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Pressuring techniques and cement thickness for cast restorations The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1978;40(5):544-48 (Abstract).
• 37) Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. dental materials 2005;21(3):262-71.
• 38) Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. dental materials 2006;22(1):13-21.
• 39) Laird W, Walmsley A. Ultrasound in dentistry. Part 1—biophysical interactions. Journal of dentistry 1991;19(1):14-17.
• 40) Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A. Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry. Journal of dentistry 2002;30(4):147-51.
• 41) Lea SC, Landini G, Walmsley AD. The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude. Journal of clinical periodontology 2006;33(1):37-41.
• 42) Maden M OE, Ertuğrul İF. Ultrasonik uç ve ekstraktör kullanılarak kırık kök kanal aletinin çıkartılması: Olgu sunumu. Süleyman Demirel Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2011;20:183-87.
• 43) Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen H, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clinical oral investigations 2000;4(4):192-98.
• 44) Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Casucci A, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin. dental materials 2008;24(9):1156-63.
• 45) Melo Filho ABd, Mori M, Jardini MAN, Landim KT, Solis ACdO. Effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on the bond strength of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement to natural teeth. An in vitro study. Brazilian oral research 2008;22(3):270-74.
• 46) Mitchell C, Abbariki M, Orr J. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns. dental materials 2000;16(3):198-206.
• 47) Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. Journal of dental research 2008;87(10):974-79.
• 48) Nagai T, Kawamoto Y, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Adhesive bonding of a lithium disilicate ceramic material with resin‐based luting agents. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2005;32(8):598-605.
• 49) Noack M, Locke LS, Roulet J. Das Randverhalten adhäsiv befestigter und mittels Ultraschall eingesetzter Porzellaninlays in vivo Dtsch Zahnärztl 1993(48):720-23 (Abstract).
• 50) Ozcan M, Mese A. Effect of ultrasonic versus manual cementation on the fracture strength of resin composite laminates. Operative dentistry 2009;34(4):437-42.
• 51) Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2003;89(3):275-81.
• 52) Öztürk A, Aykent F. Dentin bonding ajanlar ve simantasyon. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2001;4(2):128-31.
• 53) Öztürk AN, Inan O, İnan E, Öztürk B. Microtensile bond strength of cad-cam and pressed-ceramic inlays to dentin. Eur J Dent 2007;1(2):91-6.
• 54) Paradella TC. Current adhesive systems in dentistry: what is being said and researched. Odontol clín-cient 2007;6(4):293-98.
• 55) Pereira AH, Tirapelli C, Rodolpho LA. Ultrasonic dental scaler performance assessment with an innovative cavitometer. American Journal of Applied Sciences 2010;7(3):290.
• 56) Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. dental materials 2005;21(9):864-81.
• 57) Peutzfeldt A. Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1994;52(1):51-54.
• 58) Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MCG, Valandro LF, Gutierrez-Aceves G, Bolanos-Carmona MV, Del Castillo-Salmeron R, et al. Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2006;96(6):412-17.
• 59) Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer H-C. Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. dental materials 2007;23(2):211-17.
• 60) Pospiech P. All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing? Clinical oral investigations 2002;6(4):189-97.
• 61) Prochnow EP, Amaral M, Bergoli CD, Silva TB, Saavedra G, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength between indirect composite resin inlays and dentin: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical aging. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:357-63.
• 62) Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10(4):251-8.
• 63) Raposo LH, Armstrong SR, Maia RR, Qian F, Geraldeli S, Soares CJ. Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses. dental materials 2012;28(5):e50-e62.
• 64) Rathke A, Hokenmaier G, Muche R, Haller B. Effectiveness of the bond established between ceramic inlays and dentin using different luting protocols. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2012;14(2).
• 65) Roulet J-F. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. Journal of dentistry 1997;25(6):459-73.
• 66) Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength—evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. dental materials 1994;10(4):236-40.
• 67) Santos M, Mondelli R, Lauris J, Navarro M. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up. Operative Dentistry 2004;29(2):123-30.
• 68) Sarr M, Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Kane AW, Vreven J, et al. Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin. Clinical oral investigations 2010;14(5):569-77.
• 69) Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Schlup-Mityko C, Göhring TN. Interface evaluation after manual and ultrasonic insertion of standardized class I inlays using composite resin materials of different viscosity. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2005;63(4):205-12.
• 70) Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Eick JD. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. dental materials 1998;14(3):194-201.
• 71) Schulte AG, Vöckler A, Reinhardt R. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin. Journal of dentistry 2005;33(5):433-42.
• 72) Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1995;53(5):325-30.
• 73) Sjögren G, Hedlund S-O. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements: An in vitro study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1997;55(6):403-07.
• 74) Souza R, Castilho A, Fernandes V, Bottino M, Valandro L. Durability of microtensile bond to nonetched and etched feldspar ceramic: self-adhesive resin cements vs conventional resin. J Adhes Dent 2011;13(2):155-62.
• 75) Tagtekin D, Özyöney G, Yanikoglu F. Two-year clinical evaluation of IPS Empress II ceramic onlays/inlays. Operative dentistry 2009;34(4):369-78.
• 76) Tonial D GP, Lise AA et al. . Effect of conditioner on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial J 2010;12:73-79.
• 77) Towler M, Bushby A, Billington R, Hill R. A preliminary comparison of the mechanical properties of chemically cured and ultrasonically cured glass ionomer cements, using nano-indentation techniques. Biomaterials 2001;22(11):1401-06.
• 78) Towler M, Crowley C, Hill R. Investigation into the ultrasonic setting of glass ionomer cements Part I Postulated modalities. Journal of materials science letters 2003;22(7):539-41.
• 79) Trenter S, Walmsley A. Ultrasonic dental scaler: associated hazards. Journal of clinical periodontology 2003;30(2):95-101.
• 80) Twomey E, Towler M, Crowley C, Doyle J, Hampshire S. Investigation into the ultrasonic setting of glass ionomer cements Part II Setting times and compressive strengths. Journal of materials science 2004;39(14):4631-32.
• 81) Uludamar A, Akalin B, Ozkan YK. Zirkonyum esaslı tam seramik restorasyonlarda simantasyon öncesi yüzey hazırlıkları. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2011;14(2):140-53.
• 82) Uludamar A, Aygün Ş, Özkan YK. Tam Seramik Restorasyonların Simantasyonu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2011;2011(2).
• 83) Valandro LF, Della Bona A, Bottino MA, Neisser MP. The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2005;93(3):253-59.
• 84) Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. dental materials 2010;26(2):e100-e21.
• 85) Vieira LCC, Araújo É, Monteiro Júnior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. Journal of Prosthodontics 2004;13(1):28-35.
• 86)Villela-Rosa ACM, Gonçalves M, Orsi IA, Miani PK. Shear bond strength of self-etch and total-etch bonding systems at different dentin depths. Brazilian oral research 2011;25(2):143-49.
• 87) Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2009;102(5):306-12.
• 88)Walmsley A, Laird W, Lumley P. Ultrasound in dentistry. Part 2—periodontology and endodontics. Journal of dentistry 1992;20(1):11-17.
• 89) Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. dental materials 2006;22(1):45-56.
• 90) Yeşilyurt C, Bulucu B. Bond strength of total-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7:26-36.
• 91) Yesil ZD. Microtensile bond strength testing of resin cements. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 2009;29(4):352-55.
• 92) Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. Journal of dental research 2004;83(6):454-58.
• 93) Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, et al. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. dental materials 2008;24(7):967-77.