Bulk Fill Kompozit Rezinlerin İki Farklı Tabaka Kalınlığında ve Işık Gücünde Polimerize Edilmesinin Kompozitin Basma Dayanımına Etkisi

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 38 - 44, 19.06.2021

Sevde Gül Batmaz Ayşe Dündar Çağatay Barutçugil Berkan Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.29228/erd.6

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı tabaka kalınlığında ve iki farklı ışık gücünde polimerize edilen üç farklı bulk fill kompozit rezinin basma dayanımının değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, üç farklı bulk fill kompozit rezin (SonicFill 2, Kerr Dental, Orange, CA, ABD- Filtek Bulkfill 3M, ESPE, St. Paul, MN, ABD- EverX Posterior, GC, Leuven, Belçika) kullanılmıştır. Her grupta 10 numune olacak şekilde 5 mm çapında, 4 ve 6 mm kalınlıklarında ve her bir kalınlık tek tabaka olarak iki farklı ışık güç modunda (1000 mW/cm2, 3 sn - 3200 mW/cm2, 20 sn) ayrı ayrı polimeriz edilerek 120 numune hazırlandı. Toplamda 12 grup oluşturuldu. Teflon kalıplardan çıkarılan örneklerin kalınlıklarının standardizasyonunu sağlamak için örnekler dijital kumpas (Mitutoyo Digimatic) kullanılarak ölçüldü. Hazırlanan örneklerin alt ve üst yüzeyleri birbirine paralel hale getirilmek için Sof-Lex (3M ESPE Dental Products, St Paul, MN, USA) cila diskleri kullanılarak kalından inceye doğru sırası ile her bir örnek kuru ve tek yönlü olarak mikromotor ile 15000 rpm düşük devirde cilalandı. Ardından örneklere Universal test cihazı (Zwick/Roell Z250, Almanya) kullanılarak, basma dayanımı testi 1 cm/dk çapraz kafa hızında yapıldı.
Bulgular: Sonic Fill ve Filtek Bulk Fill kompozit rezinlerde ışık şiddetinin basma dayanımına istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi gözlenmemiştir (p>0,05). Sadece EverX Posterior kompozit rezinin 6 mm kalınlığındaki örneklerinde ışık şiddeti arttırıldığında basma dayanımı değerleri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde azalmıştır (p<0,05). Tabaka kalınlığının artması EverX Posterior kompozit rezin dışında basma dayanımını istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde etkilememiştir (p<0,05). Tüm gruplar arasında en yüksek değeri ekstra güç modunda polimerize edilen 4 mm kalınlığında hazırlanan EverX Posterior kompozit rezin örnekleri, en düşük değeri ise ekstra güç modunda polimerize edilen 6 mm kalınlığında hazırlanan Sonic Fill kompozit rezin örnekleri göstermiştir.
Sonuç: Standart güç modunda polimerize edilen örneklerde tabaka kalınlığı basma dayanımını değerlerini etkilemezken, ekstra güç modunda tabaka kalınlığı basma dayanımı değerlerini etkilemektedir.

Keywords

basma dayanımı, bulk fill kompozitler, tabaka kalınlığı

Supporting Institution

Akdeniz Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Project Number

TSA-2020-5191

Thanks

Bu araştırma Akdeniz Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi tarafından TSA-2020-5191 proje numarası ile desteklenmiştir. Araştırma Projeleri Birimi’mize desteklerinden dolayı teşekkür ederiz.

The Effect of Polymerizing Bulk Fill Composite Resins at Different Layer Thicknesses and Two Different Light Power on the Compressive Strength of the Composite

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the compressive strength values of three different bulk fill composite resins polymerized at two different layer thicknesses and two different light power.
Material and methods: In this study, three different bulk fill composite resins (SonicFill 2, Kerr Dental, Orange, CA, USA- Filtek Bulkfill 3M, ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA- EverX Posterior, GC, Leuven, Belgium) were used. A total of 10 samples in each group, 5 mm in diameter, 4 and 6 mm thick, and each thickness was polymerized separately in two different light power (1000 mW/cm2, 3 sec - 3200 mW/cm2, 20 sec) modes as a single layer and 120 samples were prepared. A total of 12 groups were created.The samples were measured using digital calipers (Mitutoyo Digimatic) in order to standardize the thickness of the samples extracted from Teflon molds. Sof-Lex polishing discs (3M ESPE Dental Products, St Paul, MN, USA) were used to bring the bottom and top surfaces of the prepared samples to each other, and each sample was polished in a dry and unidirectional order with a micromotor at low speed of 15000 rpm. Subsequently, the compressive strength test was performed on the samples using a Universal test device (Zwick / Roell Z250, Germany) at 1 cm / min crosshead speed.
Results: There was no statistically significant effect of light intensity on compressive strength in Sonic Fill and Filtek Bulk Fill composite resins (p> 0.05). When the light intensity was increased only in 6 mm thick samples of EverX Posterior composite resin, the compressive strength values decreased statistically significantly (p> 0.05). The increase in layer thickness did not significantly affect the compression strength, except for EverX Posterior composite resin (p <0.05). Among all groups, the 4 mm-thick EverX Posterior composite resin samples polymerized in the extra power mode had the highest value, while the lowest value was the 6 mm-thick Sonic Fill composite resin samples polymerized in the extra power mode.
Conclusion: While the layer thickness does not affect the compressive strength values in the samples polymerized in the standard power mode, the layer thickness in the extra power mode affects the compressive strength values.

Keywords

Compressive strength, bulk fill composite resins, layer thickness

Project Number

TSA-2020-5191

References

• Referans1 Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Özarslan MM, Dündar A, Yilmaz B. Color of bulk‐fill composite resin restorative materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2018;30(2):E3-E8.
• Referans2 Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. dental materials. 2011;27(4):348-55.
• Referans3 Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. British Dental Journal. 2017;222(5):337-44.
• Referans4 Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Topçu FT, Demir F. Diş hekimliğinde bulk fill kompozit rezinler. Selcuk Dental Journal.6(2):229-38.
• Referans5 Vandewalker JP, Casey JA, Lincoln TA, Vandewalle KS. Properties of dual-cure, bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials. General dentistry. 2016;64(2):68.
• Referans6 Alkhudhairy F, Vohra F. Compressive strength and the effect of duration after photo-activation among dual-cure bulk fill composite core materials. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;32(5):1199.
• Referans7 Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. Journal of dental research. 2008;87(8):710-9.
• Referans8 Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW. Flexural strength and modulus of a novel ceramic restorative cement intended for posterior restorations as determined by a three-point bending test. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2003;61(2):87-92.
• Referans9 Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donovan TE, White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1999;82(3):272-6.
• Referans10 Anusavice K. Mechanical properties of dental materials. Phillip's science of dental materials. 1996;457:493.
• Referans11 Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
• Referans12 Rueggeberg F, Caughman WF, Curtis J. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Operative dentistry. 1994;19(1):26-32.
• Referans13 Tyler J, Poole D. Uptake of fluoride by human surface enamel from ammonium bifluoride and consequent reduction in the penetration in vitro by caries-like lesions. Archives of Oral Biology. 1984;29(12):971-4.
• Referans14 Galvão M, Caldas SGFR, Calabrez-Filho S, Campos EAd, Bagnato VS, Rastelli ANdS, et al. Compressive strength of dental composites photo-activated with different light tips. Laser Physics. 2013;23(4):045604.
• Referans15 Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence international. 1993;24(9).
• Referans16 Passos SP, Freitas AP, Jumaily S, Santos MJM, Rizkalla AS, Santos Jr GC. Comparison of mechanical properties of five commercial dental core build-up materials. Compendium. 2013;34(1).
• Referans17 Ishikiriama SK, Valeretto TM, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL. The influence of" C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2012;20(6):603-6.
• Referans18 Nascimento AS, Lima DB, FOOK MVL, ALBUQUERQUE MSd, LIMA EAd, Sabino MA, et al. Physicomechanical characterization and biological evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin. Brazilian Oral Research. 2018;32.
• Referans19 Lee H-M, Kim S-C, Kang K-H, Chang N-Y. Comparison of the bonding strengths of second-and third-generation light-emitting diode light-curing units. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2016;46(6):364-71.
• Referans20 Price RB, Fahey J, Felix CM. Knoop microhardness mapping used to compare the efficacy of LED, QTH and PAC curing lights. Operative Dentistry. 2010;35(1):58-68.
• Referans21 Spranley TJ, Winkler M, Dagate J, Oncale D, Strother E. Curing light burns. General dentistry. 2012;60(4):e210-4.
• Referans22 Jain L, Mehta D, Meena N, Gupta R. Influence of light energy density, composite type, composite thickness, and postcuring phase on degree of conversion of bulk-fill composites. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2018;9(Suppl 1):S147.
• Referans23 Koupis NS, Vercruysse CW, Marks LA, Martens LC, Verbeeck RM. Curing depth of (polyacid-modified) composite resins determined by scraping and a penetrometer. Dental materials. 2004;20(10):908-14.
• Referans24 Soh M, Yap A, Siow K. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different curing modes of LED lights. Operative dentistry. 2003;28(4):371-7.
• Referans25 Tolosa MCCG, Paulillo LAMS, Giannini M, Santos AJSd, Dias CTdS. Influence of composite restorative materials and light-curing units on diametrical tensile strength. Brazilian Oral Research. 2005;19(2):123-6.
• Referans26 Kim K-H, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2002;87(6):642-9.
• Referans27 Li Y, Swartz M, Phillips R, Moore B, Roberts T. Materials science effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. Journal of Dental Research. 1985;64(12):1396-403.
• Referans28 Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1998;80(3):311-8.
• Referans29 Xu HH, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC. Effects of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. Dental Materials. 2003;19(5):359-67.
• Referans30 van Dijken JW, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities. Journal of dentistry. 2006;34(10):763-9.
• Referans31 Monaco C, Bortolotto Ibarra T, Arena A, Krejci I. Restoring nonvital premolars with composite resin onlays: effect of different fiber-reinforced composite layers on marginal adaptation and fracture load. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2015;17(6):567-74.
• Referans32 Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshihara K, Minagi S. Flexural properties of polyethylene, glass and carbon fiber-reinforced resin composites for prosthetic frameworks. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2015;73(8):581-7.
• Referans33 Xu H. Whisker-reinforced heat-cured dental resin composites: effects of filler level and heat-cure temperature and time. Journal of dental research. 2000;79(6):1392-7.
• Referans34 Didem A, Yalcin G. Comparative mechanical properties of bulk-fill resins. Open journal of composite materials. 2014;2014.
• Referans35 Wang L, D'Alpino PHP, Lopes LG, Pereira JC. Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2003;11(3):162-7.
• Referans36 Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Static and fatigue compression test for particulate filler composite resin with fiber-reinforced composite substructure. dental materials. 2007;23(1):17-23.