Research Article

CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

Volume: 4 Number: 3 July 31, 2022
  • Faruk Hadzıc *

CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

Abstract

The paper analyzes the normative-formative framework that denotes the connection between memory and identity as a crucial origin of conflicts. In addition to concerns about memory politics, historical revisionism, ethnonational identity collectivism, the paper dissolves the connection between phenomena highlighting outcomes of the peace process, transitional justice, and its ethical/moral connotations. The study argues that Western Balkan's sociopolitical stability depends on declining conflicting and contradictory memory order within radical sociopolitical processes. The revisionist contention memorializes conflicts and wars as the fundamental concept of ​​ethnicity/religion/nation. It overlaps with the neoliberal and neoconservative reduction of all competitive relations, in which only the stronger have the right to existence. Discarding dominant ethnopolitical narratives is essential for conflict transformation and transitional justice for all ethnoreligious communities. The Balkan historical events and conflicting memory (WW2/Yugoslav wars) caused sociopolitical dominion shaping the collective behavior of ethnic groups. The damaging ethnic/religious practice of genocide denial and honoring war crimes within people's social lives can become a matrix for future conflicts.  Placing memory politics with radical populism is a critical condition of collective identity politics in the former Yugoslavia. Scientific rationality can provide a solid path through the anomalies in the form of political ideologies.

Keywords

References

  1. Aleksov, Bojan (2009). We the people, Austria, USA, Hungary: Central European Univerity Press.
  2. Arendt, Hannah (1994). “Organized guilt and universal responsibility”. In Jerome Kohn (Ed.), Essays in Understanding: 1930-1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace. Bajtal, Esad (2010). “Psihosocijalni kontekst političkih elita u BiH (Psycho-social context of political elites in B&H)”. Almanah - Časopis za proučavanje, prezentaciju i zaštitu kulturno-istorijske baštine Bošnjaka/Muslimana, No. 48-49: 227-240.
  3. Bajtal, Esad (2010). “Psihosocijalni kontekst političkih elita u BiH (Psycho-social context of political elites in B&H)”. Almanah - Časopis za proučavanje, prezentaciju i zaštitu kulturno-istorijske baštine Bošnjaka/Muslimana, No. 48-49: 227-240.
  4. BBC News (2022). Fears of new conflict as Bosnia-Herzegovina faces growing Serb nationalism. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slnnVLGKeIM. January 10, 2022.
  5. Beglerovic, Nada (2020). Milorad Dodik’s Use of Contentious Rhetoric in (De) constructing Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Identity: A Discourse-Historical Analysis. Masaryk University Press.
  6. Bieber, Florian (2021). The Rise of Authoritarianism in the Western Balkans, New Perspectives on South-East Europe. New York: Springer International Publishing.
  7. Bojic, Drago (2019). Dehumanizirana sjećanja u kulturi zaborava (Dehumanized memories in a culture of forgetting). Retrieved from https://www.tacno.net/banja-luka/dehumanizirana-sjecanja-u-kulturi-zaborava/. Acessed: 12.03.2022.
  8. Brockmeier, Jens (2002). “Remembering and forgetting: Narrative as cultural memory”. Culture and Psychology, Vol. 8(1): 15-43.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Political Science

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Faruk Hadzıc * This is me
Bosnia and Herzegovina

Publication Date

July 31, 2022

Submission Date

March 25, 2022

Acceptance Date

July 26, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 4 Number: 3

APA
Hadzıc, F. (2022). CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA. Eurasian Research Journal, 4(3), 39-63. https://izlik.org/JA75NL26BP
AMA
1.Hadzıc F. CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA. ERJ. 2022;4(3):39-63. https://izlik.org/JA75NL26BP
Chicago
Hadzıc, Faruk. 2022. “CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA”. Eurasian Research Journal 4 (3): 39-63. https://izlik.org/JA75NL26BP.
EndNote
Hadzıc F (July 1, 2022) CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA. Eurasian Research Journal 4 3 39–63.
IEEE
[1]F. Hadzıc, “CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA”, ERJ, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 39–63, July 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA75NL26BP
ISNAD
Hadzıc, Faruk. “CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA”. Eurasian Research Journal 4/3 (July 1, 2022): 39-63. https://izlik.org/JA75NL26BP.
JAMA
1.Hadzıc F. CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA. ERJ. 2022;4:39–63.
MLA
Hadzıc, Faruk. “CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA”. Eurasian Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, July 2022, pp. 39-63, https://izlik.org/JA75NL26BP.
Vancouver
1.Faruk Hadzıc. CONTRADICTING HISTORICAL REVISIONIST MEMORY POLITICS, ETHNONATIONAL COLLECTIVISM, AND ANTI-TRANSFORMATION OF CONFLICTS IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA. ERJ [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 1;4(3):39-63. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA75NL26BP

Tel: +7 (727) 308 06 05
Fax: +7 (727) 338 43 33
E-mail: erj@eurasian-research.org