Research Article

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Volume: 7 Number: 3 July 30, 2025
  • Kanat Zeydin *

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Abstract

This article investigates the progress of arbitration and mediation in Kazakhstan, aiming to enhance the efficiency of the judicial system and ensure citizens’ access to justice. The study utilizes statistical data analysis to provide quantitative indicators and compares alternative dispute resolution practices in Kazakhstan with those in other countries. It examines the legislative framework governing mediation and arbitration to identify its shortcomings. Findings indicate that alternative methods are more time and cost-effective, with a 30% increase in cases resolved through mediation in 2022, highlighting their effectiveness over traditional litigation. Key recommendations include establishing standards for mediation, developing training programs for mediators, and increasing public awareness of alternative dispute resolution options. These initiatives are essential for improving legal culture and protecting human rights in Kazakhstan, ultimately fostering a more effective and accessible dispute resolution system that enhances citizens’ trust in the judiciary and raises legal awareness in society.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This study did not require approval from an ethics committee as it did not involve human participants, animals, or sensitive personal data. All data used in this research were obtained from publicly available sources.

References

  1. Abdrasulov, E., Shalabaev, S., & Mugauova, A. (2015). Interpretation of the constitution and of law-transforming principles within activity of courts and the agency of constitutional control in the Republic of Kazakhstan. European Research Studies Journal, 18, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/481
  2. Amanzholov, N. (2021). The effectiveness of participatory procedures in civil procedure [Master’s thesis, KAZGUU University named after M.S. Narikbayev]. Nur-Sultan.
  3. Ayupova, Z., & Kussainov, D. (2016). Role and place of mediation in the legal tradition of the people of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 6, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.32014/2018.2518-1467.30
  4. Bichia, M. (2023). Advantages of mediation in civil disputes. Law and World, 9(27), 63–104. https://doi.org/10.36475/9.3.6
  5. Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters. (2008). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/52/oj/eng
  6. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). (2024). Arbitration & mediation overview. https://www.finra.org/arbitration-mediation
  7. Gaur, R. (2024). Tech-driven justice: Unraveling the dynamics of online dispute resolution. LiveLaw. https://www.livelaw.in/lawschool/articles/future-of-justice-technology-alternative-dispute-resolution-260027
  8. Ige, Y. (2024). Understanding the nature and process of alternative dispute resolution and collective conciliation: Lessons from United Kingdom, Canada, South Africa and Japan. International Business Research, 10, 103–103. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v10n11p103

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Political Economy Theory

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Kanat Zeydin * This is me
0009-0006-4672-7194
Kazakhstan

Publication Date

July 30, 2025

Submission Date

April 21, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 17, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 7 Number: 3

APA
Zeydin, K. (2025). ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE. Eurasian Research Journal, 7(3), 322-339. https://izlik.org/JA99TP83BU
AMA
1.Zeydin K. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE. ERJ. 2025;7(3):322-339. https://izlik.org/JA99TP83BU
Chicago
Zeydin, Kanat. 2025. “ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE”. Eurasian Research Journal 7 (3): 322-39. https://izlik.org/JA99TP83BU.
EndNote
Zeydin K (July 1, 2025) ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE. Eurasian Research Journal 7 3 322–339.
IEEE
[1]K. Zeydin, “ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE”, ERJ, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 322–339, July 2025, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA99TP83BU
ISNAD
Zeydin, Kanat. “ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE”. Eurasian Research Journal 7/3 (July 1, 2025): 322-339. https://izlik.org/JA99TP83BU.
JAMA
1.Zeydin K. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE. ERJ. 2025;7:322–339.
MLA
Zeydin, Kanat. “ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE”. Eurasian Research Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, July 2025, pp. 322-39, https://izlik.org/JA99TP83BU.
Vancouver
1.Kanat Zeydin. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN KAZAKHSTAN: TOWARD JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO JUSTICE. ERJ [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 1;7(3):322-39. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA99TP83BU

Tel: +7 (727) 308 06 05
Fax: +7 (727) 338 43 33
E-mail: erj@eurasian-research.org