AS ONE OF THE MAIN REFERENCE OBJECTS OF POST-MODERN INTERNATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES: ENERGY

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 29 - 48, 30.10.2024

Ali Ayata , Halil Karataş

Abstract

Energy is one of the issues that have remained at the forefront throughout history as one of the basic needs of great importance for humanity. For this reason, the energy phenomenon is one of the most important phenomena that must be secured in the international system. In this study, the energy phenomenon will be discussed in terms of security and the security of the phenomenon in question will be underlined, and the importance of energy in the international system will also be emphasized. Energy will be tried to be included in expanded security studies, to which a great contribution has been made especially by the Copenhagen School, by considering both its 4 A’s (Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability and Affordability) and its supply, demand and transition dimensions. As a result of all these efforts, it is aimed to introduce the 'energy security' sector into the literature, where energy is discussed alone in the security dimension, independent of other energy sectors.

Keywords

Energy, Security, Securitization, Supply, Demand, Transition

References

• Acharya, Amitav (1994). Third World and Security Studies. Papernpresented at the conference Strategies in Conflict: Critical Approaches to Security Studies, Centre for International and Strategic Studies, York University, Toronto, 12-14 May 1994.
• Baldwin, David A. (1997). “The Concept of Security”. Review of International Studies, 23(1): 5–26.
• Ballin, Ernst H., Huub Dijstelbloem and Peter de Goede (2020). “The Extension of the Concept of Security”. In E. H. Ballin, H. Dijstelbloem and P. de Goede (Eds.). Security in an Interconnected World: 13-39. Springer (Research for Policy book series).
• Birdisli, Fikret (2020). “Uluslararası Güvenliğin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Post-Modern Güvenlik Dönemi”. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi, special isssue: 235-260.
• Buzan, Barry and Ole Wæver (1998). Liberalism and Security: The contradictions of the liberal Leviathan. Copenhagen Peace Research Institute.
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner.
• Chisiridis, Konstantinos, Kostas Mouratidis and Theodore Panagiotidis (1998). The north-south divide, the euro and the world. IOS Working Papers, No. 377, LeibnizInstitut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (IOS), Regensburg.
• Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion and Keith Morrison (2005). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
• Collins, Alan (2016). Contemporary Security Studies (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Dedeoglu, Beril (2008). Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Strateji. Yeni Yüzyıl Yayınları.
• Dorian, James P. (2006). “Central Asia: A Major Emerging Energy Player in the 21st Century”. Energy Policy, 34(5): 544-555.
• Farrell, Theo (2002). “Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program”. International Studies Review, 4(1): 49–72.
• Gocer Sahin, Sakine, Derya Cakici Eser and Selahattin Gelbal (2018). The interaction effect of the correlation between dimensions and item discrimination on parameter estimation. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(3): 239-257. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.402992
• Grigoriev, Leonid, Martial Foucault and Bastien Irondelle (2011). “Russia, Gazprom and the CAC: Interests and Relations”. In A. Dellecker, T. Gomart (Eds.), Russian Energy Security and Foreign Policy (pp. 147-169), Routledge.
• Hatipoğlu, Emre (2019). “Enerji Güvenliği”. Güvenlik Yazıları Serisi, No. 44. Herz, John H. (1950). “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma”. World Politics, 2(2): 157-180.
• Hobbes, Thomas (1946). Leviathan. In M. Oakeshott (Ed.). Basil Blackwell.
• IEA (2023). Energy security. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/about/energysecurity. Accessed: 17.06.2023.
• Jolly, Richard and Deepayan Basu Ray (2006). The Human Security Framework and National Human Development Reports-NHDR Occasional Paper 5. UN.
• Karatas, Halil (2022). “Enerji Güvenliğinin Arz Talep Ve Geçiş Güvenliği Bağlamında İncelenmesi”. SDE Akademi Dergisi, 2(5): 40-69.
• Kartal, Gokhan (2022). “Are the Effects of Energy Security on Economic Growth Symmetric Orasymmetric in Turkey? An Application of non-Linear ARDL”. Ege Academic Review, 22(4): 487-502. doi:https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.952967
• Kumar, Sunik and Niti N. Chatnani (2018). “Achieving Energy Security through Cross Border Investments: China’s Energy Infrastructure Investments across Russia & Central Asia and Lessons for India”. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(4): 1-13.
• Maslow, Abraham H. (1943). “A Theory of Human Motivation”. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
• Mekhdiev, Elnur T. (2018). “Regional Integration in Central Asia in the Energy Sector”. Теории и проблемы политических исследований, 7(1A): 99-108.
• Mérand, Frédérıc, Martial Foucault and Bastien Irondelle (Eds.). (2011). European Security Since the Fall of the Berlin Wall. University of Toronto Press.
• Mis, Nebi (2014). “Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi ve Siyasal Olanın Güvenlikleştirilmesi”. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 6(2): 345-381.
• Oliveira, Victor (2020). The Copenhagen School and the Securitization Theory. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@victoroliver/the-copenhagen-school-andthe-securitization-theory-2d0588a8c6f5. Acessed: 04.05.2023.
• Osisanya, Segun (2020). National Security versus Global Security. UN.
• Peyrouse, Sébastien, Jos Boonstra and Marlène Laruelle (2012). “Security and development approaches to Central Asia: The EU compared to China and Russia”. EUCAM Working Paper, 11(1): 1-23.
• Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan, Jinsok Sung, Ainur Talipova and Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary (2022). “Analyzing Energy Trade Policy in Central Asia Using the Intercountry Trade Force Approach”. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73: 441-454.
• Ringmar, Erik (2019). History of International Relations: A Non-European Perspective. Open Book Publishers.
• Selahaddin Bakan and Sonay Sahin (2018). “Uluslararası Güvenlik Yaklaşımlarının Tarihsel Dönüşümü ve Yeni Tehditler”. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 4(2): 135-152.
• Smil, Vaclav (2004). “World History and Energy”. Encyclopedia of Energy, 6: 549-561.
• UNDP (1994). Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. New York.
• Walt, Stephen M. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2): 211–239.
• Wells, Samuel F. (1981). “The Origins of Massive Retaliation”. Political Science Quarterly, 96(1): 31-52.
• Williams, Michael C. (2003). “Words, Images, Enemies, Securitization and International Politics”. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 511-531.
• Williams, Paul D. (Ed.). (2008). Security Studies: An Introduction. Routledge. Yenikeyeff, Shamil M. (2011). “Energy Interests of the ‘Great Powers’ in Central Asia: Cooperation or Conflict?”. The International Spectator, 46(3): 61-78.
• Yorulmaz, Murat (2014). Değişen Uluslararası Güvenlik Algılamaları Bağlamında Türkiye-Yunanistan İlişkilerinde “Değişmeyenˮ Güvenlik Paradoksu. Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1): 103-135.
• Zakhidov, Romen A. (2008). “Central Asian Countries Energy System and Role of Renewable Energy Sources”. Applied Solar Energy, 44: 218-223.