Navigating Feedback in Higher Education: Insights from University Students in Turkiye

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 19 - 40, 31.12.2024

Kübra Karakaya Özyer

Abstract

This study aims to explore university students' experiences and preferences of feedback (types and delivery methods) during their higher education. The research design incorporates a survey combining quantitative and qualitative data to examine university students' feedback experiences and satisfaction. Conducted on 105 students at a state university in Eskişehir, Turkey, the study employs descriptive statistics and a descriptive analysis to analyze the data, ensuring an authentic representation of feedback practices in higher education. Findings reveal varied feedback delivery methods and types experienced by university students, with written and verbal feedback being prevalent. Despite the commonality of written feedback, a significant preference exists for verbal feedback, highlighting its effectiveness in personal, immediate communication. Video feedback, while innovative, is least received, indicating potential technological and faculty expertise barriers. Learning Management Systems (LMS) feedback, despite its prevalence, is not preferred by students, suggesting a need for more personalized feedback methods. Peer and self-feedback are moderately preferred, reflecting the value of diverse feedback types. However, the established presence of peer feedback does not necessarily translate to a strong preference, possibly due to concerns over peer evaluation pressure or credibility. The study also uncovers a strong preference for timely and immediate feedback, underscoring the importance of prompt responses in the educational experience. The study's implications suggest a need for educational strategies to prioritize student-centered approaches, integrating various feedback types to meet students' diverse needs and preferences effectively. The research underscores feedback's critical role in educational outcomes, advocating for ongoing adaptation in feedback strategies to ensure they are conducive to student growth and learning.

Keywords

Higher education, university students, feedback types, Academic Feedback Practices

References

• Abacı, S., & Arı, F. (2020). The use of feedback in instruction. In K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş (Eds.), Foundations of instructional technologies: Theories, research, and trends (pp. 271–277). Pegem Akademi.
• Alamis, M. M. P. (2010). Evaluating students’ reactions and responses to teachers’ written feedback. Philippine ESL Journal, 5(1), 40-57.
• Alharbi, S. H. (2020). Efficacy of different types of written corrective feedback on EFL university students’ writing quality. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(4), 217-226.
• Atmaca, Ç. (2016). Contrasting perceptions of students and teachers: Written corrective feedback. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 166-182.
• Bijami, M., Pandian, A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2016). The relationship between teacher's written feedback and students' writing performance: A sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1), 59-66.
• Birenbaum, M. (2007). Assessment and instruction preferences and their relationship with test anxiety and learning strategies. Higher Education, 53(6), 749-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-4843-4.
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.
• Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2013). What feedback do students want? Politics, 33(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01446.x.
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2.
• Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp. 35-48). Kogan Page.
• Bourgault, A. M., Mundy, C., & Joshua, T. (2013). Comparison of audio vs. written feedback on clinical assignments of nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(1), 43-46.
• Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching (world). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778449
• Budge, K. (2011). A desire for the personal: Student perceptions of electronic feedback. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 342-349.
• Cameron, R. B., & Rideout, C. A. (2020). ‘It’s been a challenge finding new ways to learn’: first-year students’ perceptions of adapting to learning in a university environment. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 668–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783525
• Chokwe, J. M. (2015). Students' and tutors' perceptions of feedback on academic essays in an open and distance learning context. Open Praxis, 7(1), 39-56.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
• Çakır, R., Korkmaz, Ö., Bacanak, A., & Arslan, Ã. M. (2018). An exploration of the relationship between students’ preferences for formative feedback and self-regulated learning skills. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(4), 14-30.
• Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25-36.
• Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500.
• Eitemüller, C., Trauten, F., Striewe, M., et al. (2023). Digitalization of multistep chemistry exercises with automated formative feedback. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10043-2.
• Erişen, Y. (1997). The degree to which instructors perform feedback and correction behaviors. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 9(9), 45–62.
• Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903197883.
• Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X.
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-30.
• Glazzard, J., & Stones, S. (2019). Student perceptions of feedback in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.3.
• Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of student achievement. Allyn & Bacon Publishing. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
• Hepplestone, S., & Chikwa, G. (2014). Understanding how students process and use feedback to support their learning. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 41-53.
• Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 55-67.
• Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185-212.
• Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125.
• Kılıçkaya, F. (2022). Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1-2), 62-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1668811
• Kir, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between the beliefs and practices of instructors about oral corrective feedback in EFL classes: A case study from Turkey, International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 202. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1250587
• Kivi, P. J., Hernández, R. M., Flores, J. L. E., Garay, J. P. P., & Fuster-Guillén, D. (2021). The correlation between cognitive styles and written corrective feedback preferences among Iranian and Turkish EFL learners. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 16(2), 669-685. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i2.5643
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
• Koenka, A. C., & Anderman, E. M. (2019). Personalized feedback as a strategy for improving motivation and performance among middle school students. Middle School Journal, 50(5), 15-22.
• Kusumaningrum, S. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2019). The effect of different types of peer feedback provision on EFL students' writing performance. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 213-224.
• Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System, 25(4), 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00045-6.
• Losada, M. (1999). The complex dynamics of high performance teams. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 30(9-10), 179–192.
• Malecka, B., Boud, D., Tai, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Navigating feedback practices across learning contexts: Implications for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1330-1344.
• McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615.
• McGrath, A. L., Taylor, A., & Pychyl, T. A. (2011). Writing helpful feedback: The influence of feedback type on students’ perceptions and writing performance. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2).
• McMillan, J. H. (2015). Classroom assessment: Principles and practices for effective standards-based instruction. Eğitim Yayınevi.
• Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M. (2017). Feedback on feedback practice: Perceptions of students and academics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 266-288.
• Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37, 375-401.
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.
• Ölmezer-Öztürk, E. (2019). Beliefs and practices of Turkish EFL teachers regarding oral corrective feedback: A small-scale classroom research study. The Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1263360
• Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., Simão, A. V., & Barros, A. (2016). Effectiveness and relevance of feedback in higher education: A study of undergraduate students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 49, 7-14.
• Perera, J., Lee, N., Win, K., Perera, J., & Wijesuriya, L. (2008). Formative feedback to students: The mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations. Medical Teacher, 30(4), 395-399.
• Pokorny, H., & Pickford, P. (2010). Complexity cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 21-30.
• Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601127869 Scott, J., Shields, C., Gardner, J., Hancock, A., & Nutt, A. (2011). Student engagement with feedback. Bioscience Education, 18(1), 1-9.
• Sequeira, A. R., Bruce, M., & Paull, M. (2024). Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: An exploratory mixed methods study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2199955.
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.
• Stone, S. L. (2019). Promoting English fluency through peer feedback and dialogue journals in an ESL college classroom. Cal Poly Humboldt Theses and Projects, 284. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/etd/284.
• Şahin, M. (2015). Examination of pre-service teachers' opinions on the effectiveness of feedback applied in the learning and teaching process. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 15(1), 247–264.
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.
• Ülper, H. (2011). Students' preferences regarding receiving feedback on their draft texts. Mehmet Âkif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(22), 280–300.
• Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.
• Williams, J. R. (2008). The Declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 650-652.
• Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017). ‘It'd be useful, but I wouldn't use it’: Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2026-2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
• Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., & Rees, R. (2021). “Check the grade log out”: Students’ engagement with feedback in learning management systems. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331.
• Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179-200.