MALTA YARGILAMALARI

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 50, 125 - 150, 01.06.2015

Uluç Gürkan

Öz

1915 olaylarını soykırım olarak nitelendiren ulusal veye uluslararasıbir mahkeme kararı bulunmuyor. Tam aksine, soykırım iddialarını çürütenbir uluslararası mahkeme kararı vardır. Birinci Dünya Savaşı sonuitibariyle, 144 Osmanlı görevlisi İngilizlerce “Ermenilere yönelik toplumkatliamlar” yapmak suçlamasıyla tutuklanmış ve Malta’da Britanya’nın enyüksek hukuki otoritesi olan Londra’daki İngiliz Kraliyet Başsavcılığı’ncabir soruşturma yürütülmüştür. İngiliz hükümetinin Malta’daki Türktutukluları yargımaka ve mahkum ettirebilmek için verdiği tüm uğraşlararagmen, İngiliz Kraliyet Başsavcılığı’nın yürüttüğü soruşturma “bir İngilizmahkemesi önünde bu tür suçlamaların kanıtlanması mümkün değildir”gerekçesiyle hiçbir suçlama yapılmadan sonuçlanmıştır. Ermeni soykırımıiddialarını hukuki ve tarihi açıdan tamamıyle çürüten bulguları ile Maltayargılamaları tarihimizde çok önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Ancak bu yaunuttuğumuz ya da bize unutturulmuş bir olaydır

Anahtar Kelimeler

BM 1948 Soykırım Sözleşmesi, Osmanlı Yargılamaları, Malta Yargılamaları, İngiliz Kraliyet Başsavcılığı, Sevr Anlaşması

(THE MALTA TRIBUNALS)

Öz

There is no national or international court ruling characterizingthe 1915 events as genocide. On the contrary, there is an international courtruling in hand which refutes the genocide claims. By the end of the FirstWorld War, 144 Ottoman officials were arrested by the British on thegrounds that they had “perpetrated mass killings against Armenians,” anda legal investigation was initiated on Malta conducted by Britain’s highestlegal prosecution authority, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) inLondon. Despite the British government’s every effort to try and sentencethe Turkish detainees on Malta, the CPS inquiry resulted in no chargesbeing filed, on the grounds that “it was unlikely that such charges could beproven in a British court of law.” The Malta Tribunals, with their judicialand historical findings that refute the Armenian genocide claims as a whole,constitute an important chapter in our history. Yet it is a chapter that wehave forgotten and were made to forget

Anahtar Kelimeler

UN 1948 Genocide Convention, Ottoman Tribunals Malta Tribunals, Crown Prosecution Service, Sevres Treaty

Kaynakça

• “Letter dated 29 June 2001 from the Permanent Representative of Turkey to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General” United Nations General Assembly Security Council http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/55/a551008.pdf
• FO 371.4174.129560: CPS report dated 07.08.1919 enclosed in a letter from British FM to British Chief Prosecutor. No. 1270 of 10.07.1919
• FO 371/4172:Cypher telegram from the Foreign Ministry to Admiral Calthorpe, British Hıgh Commissioner at Constantionople, very urgent No. 33, London, 05.02.1919
• FO 371/6502/E.5845: FM’s letter to His Majesty’s Procurator-General’s Department, 31.05.1921
• FO 371/6504/E.10023: From Harrington to Rumbold, 08.24. 1921
• FO 371/6504/E.10662: Telegram from Curzon to Rumbold. Tel. No. 539 0f 27.09.1921 – FO 371/6504/E.8519:- Letter from Craigie, British Charge d’Affaires at Washington to Lord Curzon, No. 722 of 13.07.1921
• FO 371/6504/E.8745: From Dept. of H.M. Procurator General to Under Secretary of State, Foreign Office, 29.07.1921
• FO 371/6504/E.8745: Telegram from FM to Rumbold. Tel. No 851 of 08.10. 1921
• FO 371/6505/E.10870: Telegram from Rumbold to Curzon.Tel. 639 of 29.09.1921 –
• FO 371/6505/E.11011: Telegram from Rumbold to Curzon. Tel. No 645 of 04.10.1921 –
• FO 371/6505: From Plummer to War Ministry, No.4133(A) of 29.10.1921
• Full text in Turkish: “Soykırım Suçunun Önlenmesine ve Cezalandırılmasına Dair Sözleşme” (Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide) http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/insanhaklari/pdf01/33-36.pdf
• Official website of the UK Parliament, House of Lords debates, Publications and Records, 14 Apr 1999: Column 823 http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldhansrd/vo990414/ text/90414-09.htm
• “Was there an Armenian Genocide: Geoffrey Robertson’s QC Opinion” Policy Memorandum, Foreign & Commonwealth Office to Minister Full text: http://groong.usc.edu/Geoffrey-Robertson-QC-Genocide.pdf
• ECtHR Perinçek-Switzerland decision (Official French and unofficial Turkish): http://www.avim.org.tr/analiz/tr/ AIHM-PERINCEK-ISVICRE-KARARI—RESMI-FRANSIZCA-VE-RESMI-OLMAYAN-TURKCE-METIN/3066 İkincil Kaynaklar Ericson, Edward J. Ottomans and Armenians, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
• Gürkan, Uluç. Ermeni Sorunu’nun Anlamak, İstanbul: Destek Yayınları, 2012- 2.baskı (Understanding the Armenian Question)
• Gürkan, Uluç. Malta Yargılaması, İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları, 2014. (The Malta Tribunals)
• Hamparian, Aram “Confronting a Pre-Genocial Turkey”, Armenian Weekly, 02.09. 2012 - http://www.armenianweekly.com/2012/02/09/hamparianconfronting-a-pre-genocidal-turkey
• Sarınay,Yusuf. “Ermeni Tehciri ve Yargılamalar: 1915-1916”, Türk-Ermeni İlişkilerinin Gelişimi ve 1915 Olayları Uluslararası Sempozyumu Bildirileri, Ankara, 11.23-25. 2005. (Armenian deportation and proceedings: 1915-1916,” Declarations of International Symposium on the Course of Turco-Armenian relations and 1915 events)
• Schabas, William A. “Crimes Against Humanity as a Paradigm for International Atrocity Crimes,” Middle East Critique, Vol. 20, No. 3, 20.11.2011.
• Şimşir, Bilal. Malta Sürgünleri, Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1985-2. Edition. ( Malta Deportees)
• Tacar, Pulat Doğu Perinçek-İsviçre Davası İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları, 2002. (Doğu Perinçek-Switzerland Case)