Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite

Life cycle assessment of an office: Carbon footprint of an office staff

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 4, 34 - 39, 01.12.2018

Abstract

Environmental problems have become today’s most emphasized issues due to the unconscious use of natural resources and the ongoing increase in consumption resulted in an increased level of environmental pollution. Offices, where most of the daily time is being consumed in today’s modern world, generate the important amount of daily wastes and increase the environmental burden. In this respect, it is important to investigate and to reveal their environmental impacts. In this study, the Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (O-LCA) of an office has been conducted in order to investigate the environmental impacts caused by a typical office and to reveal carbon footprint of an office staff. The water and energy consumption (electricity and natural gas), transportation, and business travel data were obtained based on the real consumptions of the organization, while data required for the calculation of the waste amount (paper, cardboard, plastic etc.) were provided from literature. Afterwards, data obtained for office have been run into SimaPro Analyst 8.0.2 software in order to calculate carbon footprint and to analyze the environmental impacts. As a result of the calculations made, the carbon footprint of the office has been found as 105 kg CO2-eq year-1 and the carbon footprint of an office staff has been determined as 5263.16 kg CO2- eq year-1, accordingly. The obtained results have indicated that the highest share in terms of carbon dioxide emission is caused by electricity consumption, followed by transportation, business travel, office consumables, electronic devices, natural gas consumption, office wastes, water consumption, and electronic wastes, respectively.

References

  • Reference1 : A. Güngör, Y. İkiz, S. Palamutçu, G. Gören, G. Ağırbaş and O. Polat, “Çevreye duyarlı bakış açısı ile tekstil ürünlerinin yaşam döngülerinin analizi” (in Turkish), Tübitak Project Result Report, Project No: 104M376, Denizli, Turkey, 2007.
  • Reference2 : S. Junilla, A. Horvath and A. Guggemos, “Life cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(1), 10-17, USA, 2006.
  • Reference3 : D. Clark, “CO2 emissions due to office waste”, Information Paper-6, What Colour is Your Building, England, 2013.
  • Reference4 : Turkish Standard Enstitute (TSE), “ISO 14044 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment –Requirements and guideline”, 2007.
  • Reference5 : United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Society of Environmental Technology and Chemistry (SETAC) and Life Cycle Initiative, “Guidance on organizational life cycle assessment”, 2015.
  • Reference6 : National Environment Agency. “Waste and Recycling Statistics for 2016,” Available: http://www.nea.gov.sg/energy-waste/waste-management/waste-statistics-and-overall-recycling (accessed 18.09.2017).
  • Reference7 : European Aluminium, Aluminium beverage can recycling at 73%, Press release, Brussels, Nov. 2017. Available: https://www.european-aluminium.eu/media/1988/european-aluminium-press-release-2014-can-recycling-result-7nov2017_final.pdf (accessed 18.09.2017).
Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 4, 34 - 39, 01.12.2018

Abstract

References

  • Reference1 : A. Güngör, Y. İkiz, S. Palamutçu, G. Gören, G. Ağırbaş and O. Polat, “Çevreye duyarlı bakış açısı ile tekstil ürünlerinin yaşam döngülerinin analizi” (in Turkish), Tübitak Project Result Report, Project No: 104M376, Denizli, Turkey, 2007.
  • Reference2 : S. Junilla, A. Horvath and A. Guggemos, “Life cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(1), 10-17, USA, 2006.
  • Reference3 : D. Clark, “CO2 emissions due to office waste”, Information Paper-6, What Colour is Your Building, England, 2013.
  • Reference4 : Turkish Standard Enstitute (TSE), “ISO 14044 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment –Requirements and guideline”, 2007.
  • Reference5 : United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Society of Environmental Technology and Chemistry (SETAC) and Life Cycle Initiative, “Guidance on organizational life cycle assessment”, 2015.
  • Reference6 : National Environment Agency. “Waste and Recycling Statistics for 2016,” Available: http://www.nea.gov.sg/energy-waste/waste-management/waste-statistics-and-overall-recycling (accessed 18.09.2017).
  • Reference7 : European Aluminium, Aluminium beverage can recycling at 73%, Press release, Brussels, Nov. 2017. Available: https://www.european-aluminium.eu/media/1988/european-aluminium-press-release-2014-can-recycling-result-7nov2017_final.pdf (accessed 18.09.2017).
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Environmental Engineering
Journal Section Conference Paper
Authors

Nilay Cambaz

E. Gamze Taskin This is me

Ali Ruzgar This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2018
Submission Date May 30, 2018
Acceptance Date September 20, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 1 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Cambaz, N., Taskin, E. G., & Ruzgar, A. (2018). Life cycle assessment of an office: Carbon footprint of an office staff. Environmental Research and Technology, 1(4), 34-39.
AMA Cambaz N, Taskin EG, Ruzgar A. Life cycle assessment of an office: Carbon footprint of an office staff. ERT. December 2018;1(4):34-39.
Chicago Cambaz, Nilay, E. Gamze Taskin, and Ali Ruzgar. “Life Cycle Assessment of an Office: Carbon Footprint of an Office Staff”. Environmental Research and Technology 1, no. 4 (December 2018): 34-39.
EndNote Cambaz N, Taskin EG, Ruzgar A (December 1, 2018) Life cycle assessment of an office: Carbon footprint of an office staff. Environmental Research and Technology 1 4 34–39.
IEEE N. Cambaz, E. G. Taskin, and A. Ruzgar, “Life cycle assessment of an office: Carbon footprint of an office staff”, ERT, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 34–39, 2018.
ISNAD Cambaz, Nilay et al. “Life Cycle Assessment of an Office: Carbon Footprint of an Office Staff”. Environmental Research and Technology 1/4 (December 2018), 34-39.
JAMA Cambaz N, Taskin EG, Ruzgar A. Life cycle assessment of an office: Carbon footprint of an office staff. ERT. 2018;1:34–39.
MLA Cambaz, Nilay et al. “Life Cycle Assessment of an Office: Carbon Footprint of an Office Staff”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 1, no. 4, 2018, pp. 34-39.
Vancouver Cambaz N, Taskin EG, Ruzgar A. Life cycle assessment of an office: Carbon footprint of an office staff. ERT. 2018;1(4):34-9.