ULUSLARARASI BARIŞ VE GÜVENLİK HUKUKUNDA SORUMLULUK ANLAYIŞI VE KLASİK SORUMLULUK REJİMİ

Abstract

Bu makalenin yayınlanma tarihi itibariyle öz bölümü bulunmamaktır.

Keywords

• uluslararası barış
• uluslararası güvenlik hukuku
• klasik sorumluluk rejimi

THE UNDERSTANDING OF RESPONSIBILITY AND THE CLASSICAL RESPONSIBILITY REGIME IN INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY LAW

Abstract

As of the publication date, this article does not have an abstract section.

Keywords

• International peace
• international security law
• and the classical responsibility regime

References

1. M.E. ÇAĞIRAN, Les sanctions non-militaires de l’article 41 de la Charte de l’O.N.U., Galatasaray Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2000.
2. B. SIMMA, “SelfContained Regimes”, Netherland Yearbook of International Law, vol. XVI, 1985.
3. P.M. DUPUY, “Le fait générateur de la responsabilité internationale des Etats”, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international (La Haye) (R.C.A.D.I.), 1984-V, vol. 188.
4. Oppenheim's International Law, Ninth Edition, Longman, Harlow, 1992, s. 499 vd.; N.Q. DINH, P. DAILLIER, A. PELLET, Droit international public, 4 e édition, L.G.D.J., Paris, 1992.
5. Annuaire de la Commission du droit international (A.C.D.I.), 1976/1.
6. P. TAVERNIER, La responsabilité dans le système international, Colloque du Mans, Pedone, 1991.
7. J. COMBACAU, Le pouvoir de sanction de l’O.N.U. Etude théorique de la coercition non militaire, Pedone, 1974.
8. H. THIERRY, J. COMBACAU, S. SUR, Ch. VALLEE, Droit international public, Montchrestien, 1986.

9. O. SCHACHTER, “The Quasi-Judicial Role of the Security Council and the General Assemly”, American Journal of International Law (A.J.I.L.), 1964,
10. M. FOUCAULT, Surveiller et punir- Naissance de la prison, Gallimard, 1975.